Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. M. Dorcus. Effect of suggestion and tobacco on pulse rate and blood pressure. , 1925 .
[2] G. A. Miller,et al. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .
[3] J. Gibson,et al. Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment? , 1955, Psychological review.
[4] G. A. Miller,et al. Erratum: An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 339 (1955)] , 1955 .
[5] A M Liberman,et al. Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.
[6] C. Baltaxe,et al. Principles of phonology , 1969 .
[7] Robert G. Crowder,et al. The sound of vowels and consonants in immediate memory , 1971 .
[8] H. Goto,et al. Auditory perception by normal Japanese adults of the sounds "L" and "R". , 1971, Neuropsychologia.
[9] R. G. Crowder,et al. Representation of speech sounds in precategorical acoustic storage. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.
[10] A. Liberman,et al. An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English , 1975 .
[11] Peter D. Eimas,et al. Auditory and phonetic coding of the cues for speech: Discrimination of the [r-l] distinction by young infants , 1975 .
[12] M. Ruhlen. A guide to the languages of the world , 1977 .
[13] J. Werker,et al. Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.
[14] Catherine T. Best,et al. Perceptual equivalence of acoustic cues in speech and nonspeech perception , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.
[15] M. Mochizuki. The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech , 1981 .
[16] Catherine T. Best,et al. Categorical perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese bilinguals , 1981, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[17] D B Pisoni,et al. Some effects of laboratory training on identification and discrimination of voicing contrasts in stop consonants. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[18] K. Mackain. Assessing the role of experience on infants' speech discrimination , 1982, Journal of Child Language.
[19] W. Nelson Francis,et al. FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH USAGE: LEXICON AND GRAMMAR , 1983 .
[20] D. Whalen. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches slow phonetic judgments , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[21] Ian Maddieson,et al. Patterns of sounds , 1986 .
[22] W. Strange,et al. Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[23] J. Werker,et al. Perceptual flexibility: maintenance or recovery of the ability to discriminate non-native speech sounds. , 1984, Canadian journal of psychology.
[24] J. Werker,et al. Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] J S Logan,et al. Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] Louis Goldstein,et al. Towards an articulatory phonology , 1986, Phonology.
[27] C. Fowler. An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct realist perspective , 1986 .
[28] Janet F. Werker,et al. Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. , 1988 .
[29] P. Kuhl. Auditory perception and the evolution of speech , 1988 .
[30] C. Best,et al. Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] J E Flege,et al. Chinese subjects' perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast: performance before and after training. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] R. S. McGowan,et al. The emergence of phonetic segments: evidence from the spectral structure of fricative-vowel syllables spoken by children and adults. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[33] P. Kuhl,et al. Categorization of Speech by Infants: Support for Speech-Sound Prototypes. , 1989 .
[34] A M Liberman,et al. A specialization for speech perception. , 1989, Science.
[35] C. Fowler. Real Objects of Speech Perception: A Commentary on Diehl and Kluender , 1989 .
[36] Louis Goldstein,et al. Articulatory gestures as phonological units , 1989, Phonology.
[37] R. Diehl,et al. On the Objects of Speech Perception , 1989 .
[38] Franklin S. Cooper,et al. The Haskins Laboratories’ pulse code modulation (PCM) system , 1990 .
[39] Carol A. Fowler,et al. Young infants’ perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[40] Louis Goldstein,et al. Representation and reality: physical systems and phonological structure , 1990 .
[41] Louis Goldstein,et al. Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures , 1990 .
[42] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[43] P. Kuhl. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[44] D. Whalen. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[45] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] L. Polka. Cross-language speech perception in adults: phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[47] Y. Tohkura,et al. The effects of experimental variables on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese listeners , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[48] C. Browman,et al. Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.
[49] J. L. Miller,et al. Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] W. Strange,et al. Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants , 1992 .
[51] L Polka,et al. Characterizing the influence of native language experience on adult speech perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[52] K. Stevens,et al. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.
[53] S. Lively,et al. An examination of the perceptual magnet effect , 1993 .
[54] Catherine T. Best,et al. Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .
[55] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[56] C. Best. The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: A perceptual assimilation model. , 1994 .
[57] Stefaan Decoene. Detection theory - a users guide - macmillan,na, creelman,cd , 1994 .
[58] Joanne L. Miller. On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report , 1994, Cognition.
[59] D. Pisoni,et al. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[60] J. Werker,et al. Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[61] Keith R. Kluender,et al. Speech perception as a tractable problem in cognitive science. , 1994 .
[62] R. Fox. Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1994 .
[63] N. Takagi. Signal detection modeling of Japanese listeners' /r/-/l/ labeling behavior in one-interval identification task. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[64] J. Sussman,et al. Further tests of the "perceptual magnet effect" in the perception of [i]: identification and change/no-change discrimination. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[65] S. Crain,et al. Cognitive Profiles of Reading-Disabled Children: Comparison of Language Skills in Phonology, Morphology, and Syntax , 1995 .
[66] Phonological and phonotactic influences on perception of two non‐native vowel contrasts , 1995 .
[67] Catherine T. Best,et al. Divergent developmental patterns for infants' perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts , 1995 .
[68] Catherine T. Best,et al. Learning to perceive the sound pattern of english , 1995 .
[69] Effects of bilingualism on non‐native phonetic contrasts. , 1996 .
[70] O. Bohn,et al. A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[71] Pierre A. Hallé,et al. The format of representation of recognized words in infants' early receptive lexicon , 1996 .
[72] P. Ladefoged,et al. The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .
[73] P. Kuhl,et al. Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[74] Catherine T. Best,et al. Assimilation of non‐native vowel contrasts to the American English vowel system. , 1996 .
[75] J. Werker,et al. Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks , 1997, Nature.
[76] C. Pallier,et al. A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception , 1997, Cognition.
[77] U. Frauenfelder,et al. Processing of illegal consonant clusters : A case of perceptual assimilation ? , 1998 .
[78] A. Lotto,et al. Depolarizing the perceptual magnet effect. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[79] Hollis S. Scarborough,et al. Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ , 1998 .
[80] Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al. The processing of illegal consonant clusters: A case of perceptual assimilation? , 1998 .
[81] Catherine T. Best,et al. Left-Hemisphere Advantage for Click Consonants is Determined by Linguistic Significance and Experience , 1999 .
[82] J E Flege,et al. Adults’ perception of native and nonnative vowels: Implications for the perceptual magnet effect , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.
[83] Pierre A. Hallé,et al. Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants , 1999 .
[84] J. Flege,et al. An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[85] J. Segui,et al. Where Is the /b/ in “absurde” [apsyrd]? It Is in French Listeners' Minds , 2000 .