Situating Technoscience: An Inquiry into Spatialities

This paper explores the spatial characteristics of science and technology. Originally seen as universal, and therefore outside space and place, studies in science, technology, and society (STS) located it first in specific locations—laboratories—and then in narrow networks linking laboratories. This double location implied that science is caught up in and enacts two topological forms—region and network—since objects in networks hold their shape by freezing relations rather than fixing Euclidean coordinates. More recent STS work suggests that science and technology also exist in and help to enact additional spatial forms. Thus some technoscience objects are fluid, holding their form by shifting their relations. And yet others achieve constancy by enacting simultaneous absence and presence, a topological possibility which we call here fire. The paper concludes by arguing that the ‘global’ includes and is enacted in all four of these topological systems.

[1]  Helen Verran Re-imagining land ownership in Australia , 1998 .

[2]  Kirsten Hastrup,et al.  Siting Culture: The Shifting Anthropological Object , 1996 .

[3]  A. Rainone,et al.  Kuhn Thomas S. , 1993 .

[4]  John Law,et al.  On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India , 1984 .

[5]  Michel Serres,et al.  Le passage du Nord-Ouest , 1980 .

[6]  K. Knorr-Cetina The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1985 .

[7]  Michael Lynch,et al.  Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory , 1985 .

[8]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in A Research Laboratory. , 1987 .

[9]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[10]  B. Latour Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[11]  A. Mol,et al.  Regions, Networks and Fluids: Anaemia and Social Topology , 1994, Social studies of science.

[12]  Kathleen Lennon,et al.  Modest_ Witness@Second__Millennium.FemaleMan.© Meets_Oncomouse™: Feminism and Technoscience , 1998 .

[13]  Gillian Rose,et al.  The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change , 1991 .

[14]  S. Woolgar,et al.  The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1982 .

[15]  S. Shapin,et al.  Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life , 1987 .

[16]  Nick Lee,et al.  Otherness and the Actor Network , 1994 .

[17]  R. Swinburne OBJECTIVE KNOWLEDGE: AN EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH , 1973 .

[18]  J. Law,et al.  Complexities: Social Studies of Knowledge Practices , 2002 .

[19]  D. Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity. An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (an excerpt) , 1991, Journal of Economic Sociology.

[20]  T. Ingold The temporality of the landscape , 1993, The Perception of the Environment.

[21]  M. Strathern Cutting the Network , 1996 .

[22]  K. Hetherington In Place of Geometry: The Materiality of Place , 1998 .

[23]  John Law,et al.  Aircraft Stories: Decentering the Object in Technoscience , 2002 .

[24]  K. Popper Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .

[25]  R. Munro,et al.  Ideas of Difference: Social Spaces and the Labour of Division , 1997 .

[26]  N. Thrift Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 1995 .

[27]  J. Urry Time, Complexity and the Global , 2002 .

[28]  Nick Lee,et al.  Social Order and the Blank Figure , 2000 .

[29]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[30]  David Harvey,et al.  The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. , 1991 .

[31]  Mark Warhus,et al.  Maps are Territories: Science is an Atlas , 1994 .

[32]  Marianne de Laet,et al.  The Zimbabwe Bush Pump , 2000 .

[33]  Hilary Rose,et al.  Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. Femaleman. copyright Meets_OncoMouse trademark: Feminism and Technoscience. Donna J. Haraway , 1998 .

[34]  B. Latour On Recalling Ant , 1999 .

[35]  J. Urry,et al.  Economies of signs and space , 1994 .

[36]  John Law,et al.  Allegory and its others , 2003 .

[37]  J. MacLaughlin Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory , 1994 .

[38]  N. Thrift,et al.  Spatial Formations , 1998 .

[39]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[40]  D. Haraway,et al.  Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse , 1997 .

[41]  J. L. Heilbron,et al.  Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life , 1989, Medical History.

[42]  A. Ross,et al.  The Psychoanalysis of Fire , 1964 .

[43]  David Turnbull,et al.  Maps are Territories: Science is an Atlas , 1993 .

[44]  E. Soja Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory , 1989 .

[45]  S. Shapin Laboratory life. The social construction of scientific facts , 1981, Medical History.

[46]  D. Massey Space, Place, and Gender , 1994 .