Modeling Surface and Subsurface Pesticide Transport Under Three Field Conditions Using PRZM-3 and GLEAMS

Contaminant transport models should be evaluated over a wide range of conditions to determine their limitations. The models PRZM and GLEAMS have been evaluated many times, but few studies are available in which predicted movement in runoff and percolate were simultaneously evaluated against field data. Studies of this type are essential because pesticide leaching and runoff are mutually dependent processes. For this reason, PRZM-3 and GLEAMS were evaluated for their ability to predict metribuzin concentrations in runoff, sediment, subsurface soil, and pan lysimeters under three field conditions (yard waste compost amended, no-till, and conventional-till) on a Lowell silt loam soil. Sensitive input parameters were either site specific (climatic, soil, and chemical) or calibrated (K-factor, C-factor, curve number). In general, both models under-predicted metribuzin concentration in runoff water, runoff sediment, subplow layer soil (15-75 cm), and pan lysimeter water (75 cm). Contrary to field data, both models predicted that a large percentage (> 50%) of metribuzin would move below the “mixing zone” (top 1 cm) during the first rainfall event after application. Relatively little metribuzin was predicted to move beyond the plow layer (top 15 cm) into the pan lysimeters or subsurface soil throughout the simulation period, possibly due to the lack of a macropore component in the models. High metribuzin concentrations in sediment (field data) indicated that relatively little metribuzin moved below the “mixing zone”, possibly because of hysteresis but much of the metribuzin that did move was quickly transported into the pan lysimeters, probably due to macropore flow. GLEAMS more accurately predicted pesticide concentration in sediment and PRZM predicted subsurface soil concentration somewhat more accurately than GLEAMS. Little difference in accuracy was detected between models on metribuzin concentration in runoff or metribuzin concentration in percolate. Although both models generally under-predicted metribuzin concentration in runoff, runoff transport (mass of metribuzin in runoff) for the study period was over-predicted by both models which emphasizes the importance of accurately predicting herbicide concentration and runoff volume soon after application when the surface pesticide concentrations are highest.

[1]  P. A. Banks,et al.  Alachlor and Metribuzin Movement and Dissipation in a Soil Profile as Influenced by Soil Surface Condition , 1990, Weed Science.

[2]  A. B. Bottcher,et al.  FIELD TESTING AND COMPARISON OF THE PRZM AND GLEAMS MODELS , 1991 .

[3]  Fred K. Fong,et al.  Tests of the pesticide root zone model and the aggregate model for transport and transformation of aldicarb, metolachlor, and bromide , 1992 .

[4]  Gary E. Blau,et al.  The Role of Sensitivity Analysis in Groundwater Risk Modeling for Pesticides , 1992, Weed Technology.

[5]  P. A. Banks,et al.  Comparison of Przm and Gleams computer model predictions with field data for alachlor, metribuzin and norflurazon leaching , 1992 .

[6]  Matthew Lorber,et al.  The Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM): A procedure for evaluating pesticide leaching threats to groundwater , 1985 .

[7]  G. R. Foster,et al.  Sediment Composition for Nonpoint Source Pollution Analyses , 1985 .

[8]  G. K. Felton SOIL HYDRAULIC PROPERTIES OF RECLAIMED PRIME FARMLAND , 1992 .

[9]  S. Zacharias,et al.  Evaluation of GLEAMS and PRZM for Predicting Pesticide Leaching under Field Conditions , 1994 .

[10]  S. Karickhoff,et al.  SORPTION OF HYDROPHOBIC POLLUTANTS ON NATURAL SEDIMENTS , 1979 .

[11]  Stephen C. Hern,et al.  Evaluation of Sesoil, Przm and Pestan in a laboratory column leaching experiment , 1986 .

[12]  J. Conn,et al.  Sorption of Metribuzin and Metolachlor in Alaskan Subarctic Agricultural Soils , 1992, Weed Science.

[13]  S. Karickhoff,et al.  Organic Pollutant Sorption in Aquatic Systems , 1984 .

[14]  W. R. Roy,et al.  Project summary: batch - type procedures for estimating soil adsorption of chemicals. , 1992 .

[15]  Markus Flury,et al.  Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils - a review , 1996 .

[16]  Olivier Banton,et al.  Evaluation of groundwater vulnerability to pesticides: A comparison between the pesticide drastic index and the PRZM leaching quantities , 1989 .

[17]  R. Malone,et al.  Extraction of Metribuzin from Soil Using Supercritical CO2 (SFE) , 1997, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[18]  J. Mullins,et al.  PRZM-2, a model for predicting pesticide fate in the crop root and unsaturated soil zones: User's manual for release 2. 0 , 1993 .

[19]  Tommy C. Daniel,et al.  Comparison of the pesticide root zone model simulated and measured pesticide mobility under two tillage systems. , 1990 .

[20]  Martin A. Locke,et al.  Metribuzin degradation in soil. I, Effects of soybean residue amendment, metribuzin level, and soil depth , 1991 .

[21]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  GLEAMS: Groundwater Loading Effects of Agricultural Management Systems , 1987 .

[22]  Ward N. Smith,et al.  EVALUATION OF PRZM AND LEACHMP ON INTACT SOIL COLUMNS , 1991 .

[23]  R. Malone,et al.  Runoff Losses of Surface-Applied Metribuzin as Influenced by Yard Waste Compost Amendments, No-Tillage, and Conventional-Tillage , 1996, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[24]  R. E. Phillips,et al.  Macroporosity of a Well‐Drained Soil under No‐Till and Conventional Tillage , 1991 .

[25]  Fred W. Roeth,et al.  Effects of tillage, application time and rate on metribuzin dissipation , 1991 .

[26]  Kurt D. Pennell,et al.  Evaluation of Five Simulation Models for Predicting Aldicarb and Bromide Behavior Under Field Conditions , 1990 .

[27]  M. Alexander,et al.  Factors affecting the microbial degradation of phenanthrene in soil , 1991, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[28]  Warren A. Dick,et al.  Initial storm effects on macrospore transport of surface-applied chemical in no-till soil , 1990 .

[29]  S. K. Xue,et al.  Modeling Adsorption-Desorption Kinetics of Alachlor in a Typic Fragiudalf , 1995 .

[30]  G. F. Warren,et al.  Adsorption and Desorption of Herbicides by Soil , 1964 .

[31]  E. J. Monke,et al.  Pesticide and Nutrient Movement into Subsurface Tile Drains on a Silt Loam Soil in Indiana , 1991 .

[32]  W. C. Koskinen,et al.  Characterization of Hysteresis in the Desorption of 2,4,5-T from Soils 1 , 1979 .

[33]  M. L. Jackson,et al.  Selective Erosion of Soil Fertility Constituents , 1952 .

[34]  W. P. Miller,et al.  A micro‐pipette method for soil mechanical analysis , 1987 .

[35]  Edward E. Gbur,et al.  Degradation and Field Persistence of Imazethapyr , 1990, Weed Science.

[36]  Joe T. Ritchie,et al.  Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover , 1972 .

[37]  David S. Brown,et al.  Conducting Field Studies for Testing Pesticide Leaching Models , 1990 .

[38]  R. G. Williams,et al.  Runoff of sulfometuron-methyl and cyanazine from small plots : effects of formulation and grass cover , 1990 .

[39]  R. A. Leonard,et al.  Fenamiphos transport, transformation, and degradation in a highly weathered soil , 1998 .

[40]  A. G. Hornsby,et al.  Pesticide properties in the environment , 1995 .

[41]  J. Boesten,et al.  MODELING ADSORPTION/DESORPTION KINETICS OF PESTICIDES IN A SOIL SUSPENSION , 1988 .