Timber production possibilities of the Norwegian forest area and measures for a sustainable forestry

Abstract This paper presents long-range forest management analyses with the objective of mapping consequences for the timber production potential when forest management treatments are changed in an environmentally oriented direction. Sample plots from the National Forest Inventory, covering the entire productive forest area in Norway, were aggregated into 10000 treatment units. Management strategies maximising the net present value of the forest-land, with certain environmentally oriented constraints, were analysed. The following environmentally oriented constraints were considered: (i) areas of current old forest set aside, either proportionally or cost-efficiently, for permanent preservation, (ii) minimum target levels for area covered by old forest through time, (iii) retention of trees at final felling, and (iv) restricted management for border zone areas. With a real rate of discount of 2.5%, and all the constraints imposed simultaneously, the annual harvest potential was reduced by 30% for the first 10-year period, while the net present value was reduced by 21.5%. The results further demonstrated significant efficiency gains of letting the preservation of old forest be allocated cost-efficiently, compared with a strategy of setting aside an equal portion on all eligible areas.

[1]  Alan T. Murray Spatial restrictions in harvest scheduling , 1999 .

[2]  T. Lämås,et al.  Different management regimes in a boreal forest landscape : ecological and economic effects , 2000 .

[3]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  An interactive multiobjective approach to harvest decisions in forest planning. , 1998 .

[4]  H. Braastad Tilvekstmodellprogram for bjørk , 1977 .

[5]  M. Ohlson,et al.  Long-term spruce forest continuity – a challenge for a sustainable Scandinavian forestry , 1999 .

[6]  Conceptual Issues of Ecosystem Management , 1999 .

[7]  J. W. Thomas Forest Service Perspective on Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[8]  Reed F. Noss,et al.  Assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity: A suggested framework and indicators , 1999 .

[9]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  Future directions for biodiversity conservation in managed forests: indicator species, impact studies and monitoring programs , 1999 .

[10]  Tron Eid,et al.  AVVIRK-2000: A Large-scale Forestry Scenario Model for Long-term Investment, Income and Harvest Analyses , 2000 .

[11]  Markku Siitonen Experiences in the use of forest management planning models. , 1993 .

[12]  Ola Sallnäs,et al.  Harvest scheduling under adjacency constraints — a case study from the Swedish sub‐alpine region , 1993 .

[13]  J. K. Gilless,et al.  Economic and fragmentation effects of clearcut restrictions , 1998 .

[14]  Andres Weintraub,et al.  Aggregation Procedures in Forest Management Planning Using Cluster Analysis , 1997, Forest Science.

[15]  Juha Lappi,et al.  JLP: A linear programming package for management planning. , 1992 .

[16]  Finn Helles,et al.  A dual approach to policy analysis in multiple-use forest management planning , 1997 .

[17]  Robert T. Lackey,et al.  Radically contested assertions in ecosystem management. , 1999 .

[18]  Mattias Carlsson,et al.  A method for integrated planning of timber production and biodiversity: a case study , 1999 .

[19]  John Sessions,et al.  Forest planning in an Oregon case study: Defining the problem and attempting to meet goals with a spatial-analysis technique , 1996, Environmental management.

[20]  Tuula Nuutinen,et al.  Site‐specific constraints in integrated forest planning , 1996 .

[21]  Chris Elliott,et al.  Certification of forest products : issues and perspectives , 1996 .

[22]  H. L. Scheurman,et al.  Techniques for Prescribing Optimal Timber Harvest and Investment Under Different Objectives—Discussion and Synthesis , 1977 .

[23]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Economic analysis of timber management practices promoting preservation of biological diversity , 1997 .

[24]  F. Helles,et al.  Spatial optimization by simulated annealing and linear programming , 1997 .

[25]  Finn Helles,et al.  A four-stage approach to evaluate management alternatives in multiple-use forestry , 1999 .

[26]  T. Eid,et al.  Economic consequences of sustainable forest management regimes at non-industrial forest owner level in Norway , 2001 .

[27]  C. Revelle,et al.  Dynamic Selection of Harvests with Adjacency Restrictions: The SHARe Model , 1997 .

[28]  Oscar García,et al.  Linear programming and related approaches in forest planning. , 1990 .