Sharing is (s)caring? Interactions between buses and bicyclists on bus lanes shared with bicyclists

Abstract This paper presents the results of an observation study of interactions between bicyclists and buses on shared bus lanes. The aim of the paper is to analyse bicyclists’ safety on bus lanes shared with bicyclists. Straight sections of two bus lanes shared with bicyclists in Belgium are observed. All interactions between bicyclists and buses over two full weeks are recorded and analysed. Additionally, the lateral position and riding speed of bicyclists that are in interaction with buses are compared with the behaviour of bicyclists that are not in interaction with buses. One of the observed bus lanes is in line with road design guidelines in a number of countries that state that a sufficiently narrow bus lane ( The results show that close interactions between bicyclists and buses are relatively frequent on both types of analysed bus lanes. Close overtaking manoeuvres (a bus overtakes a bicyclist with a lateral distance less than 1 m) as well as close bicycle-following situations (a bus drives behind a bicyclist with a time gap less than 2 s) are quite common on both analysed bus lanes. The analyses could not confirm the hypothesis that a sufficiently narrow bus lane is safer than a wider bus lane. On the contrary, close interactions seem even slightly more common on the narrower bus lane. Slightly more close overtaking manoeuvres take place on the narrower bus lane, but the difference is not statistically significant. Additionally, more bicycle-following situations take place on the narrower bus lane because overtaking is more difficult. The results show that buses often maintain a close time gap in these situations. The overtaking speed of the buses is, however, significantly higher on the wider bus lane compared to the narrower one. Moreover, the presence of a bus has an influence on the behaviour of bicyclists. Bicyclists who get overtaken by a bus ride more closely to the edge of the road than bicyclists who are not in interaction with a bus. While the road design guidelines assume that bicyclists take up a width of one meter from the edge on bus lanes shared with bicyclists, the observations show that bicyclists take up much less space while being overtaken. The presence of a bus does not have a significant influence on the standard deviation of the lateral position of the bicyclist. On the narrower bus lane, some findings suggest that bicyclists who are involved in an interaction with a bus ride faster than bicyclists who are not involved in an interaction with a bus.

[1]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Safety-in-numbers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence , 2017 .

[2]  A. Horst A time-based analysis of road user behaviour in normal and critical encounters , 1990 .

[3]  Jeremy Broughton,et al.  Getting off your bike: cycling accidents in Great Britain in 1990-1999. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Me Zeibots,et al.  Bike rider and bus driver interaction study - Draft report , 2012 .

[5]  Asha Weinstein Agrawal,et al.  Shared-Use Bus Priority Lanes on City Streets: Case Studies in Design and Management , 2012 .

[6]  Gudmundur F. Ulfarsson,et al.  Bicyclist injury severities in bicycle-motor vehicle accidents. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Praprut Songchitruksa,et al.  The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  A comparison of collision-based and conflict-based safety evaluations: the case of right-turn smart channels. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Ming-Chang Jeng,et al.  The use of a quasi-naturalistic riding method to investigate bicyclists' behaviors when motorists pass. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Ian Walker,et al.  The influence of a bicycle commuter's appearance on drivers' overtaking proximities: an on-road test of bicyclist stereotypes, high-visibility clothing and safety aids in the United Kingdom. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Bus lane safety implications: a case study in Hong Kong , 2014 .

[12]  Gerald Brown,et al.  Traffic conflicts for road user safety studies , 1994 .

[13]  Sean Burns,et al.  Is the three-foot bicycle passing law working in Baltimore, Maryland? , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Geert Wets,et al.  Drivers' behavioral responses to combined speed and red light cameras. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures , 2009 .

[16]  John Parkin,et al.  The effect of cycle lanes on the proximity between motor traffic and cycle traffic. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Chih-Wei Pai,et al.  Overtaking, rear-end, and door crashes involving bicycles: an empirical investigation. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  H Burg,et al.  Handbuch der Verkehrsunfallrekonstruktion. Unfallaufnahme - Fahrdynamik - Simulation , 2007 .

[19]  Karim Ismail,et al.  Traffic conflict techniques for road safety analysis: open questions and some insights , 2014 .

[20]  C. Hydén,et al.  Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: theoretical framework and first implementation. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Rik de Groot,et al.  Design manual for bicycle traffic , 2007 .

[22]  Ruediger Lamm,et al.  Highway Design and Traffic Safety Engineering Handbook , 1999 .

[23]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[24]  Geert Wets,et al.  Road Safety Differences between Priority-Controlled Intersections and Right-Hand Priority Intersections , 2013 .

[25]  Mark Wardman,et al.  Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Michael Hunter,et al.  Evaluation of Postencroachment Time as Surrogate for Opposing Left-Turn Crashes , 2013 .

[27]  Brian Caulfield,et al.  Determining bicycle infrastructure preferences – A case study of Dublin , 2012 .

[28]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Safety performance functions using traffic conflicts , 2013 .

[29]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Do accident-involved drivers exhibit riskier everyday driving behavior? , 1982 .

[30]  Ian Walker,et al.  Drivers overtaking bicyclists: objective data on the effects of riding position, helmet use, vehicle type and apparent gender. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Rune Elvik,et al.  Safety-in-numbers: Estimates based on a sample of pedestrian crossings in Norway. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[32]  Frank C. Leeming,et al.  Headway on urban streets: observational data and an intervention to decrease tailgating , 2000 .

[33]  P Eady,et al.  Cycling aspects of Austroads guides , 2011 .

[34]  C. Hydén THE DEVELOPMENT OF A METHOD FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY EVALUATION: THE SWEDISH TRAFFIC CONFLICTS TECHNIQUE , 1987 .

[35]  J Devenport AN EVALUATION OF BUS LANE SAFETY , 1987 .

[36]  Stella C Shackel,et al.  Influence of road markings, lane widths and driver behaviour on proximity and speed of vehicles overtaking cyclists. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[37]  Dominique Lord,et al.  Analysis of Pedestrian Conflicts with Left-Turning Traffic , 1996 .