Robust global sensitivity analysis of a river management model to assess nonlinear and interaction effects

The simulation of routing and distribution of water through a regulated river system with a river management model will quickly result in complex and nonlinear model behaviour. A robust sensitivity analysis increases the transparency of the model and provides both the modeller and the system manager with a better understanding and insight on how the model simulates reality and management operations. In this study, a robust, density-based sensitivity analysis, developed by Plischke et al. (2013), is applied to an eWater Source river management model. This sensitivity analysis methodology is extended to not only account for main effects but also for interaction effects. The combination of sensitivity indices and scatter plots enables the identification of major linear effects as well as subtle minor and nonlinear effects. The case study is an idealized river management model representing typical conditions of the southern Murray–Darling Basin in Australia for which the sensitivity of a variety of model outcomes to variations in the driving forces, inflow to the system, rainfall and potential evapotranspiration, is examined. The model outcomes are most sensitive to the inflow to the system, but the sensitivity analysis identified minor effects of potential evapotranspiration and nonlinear interaction effects between inflow and potential evapotranspiration.

[1]  John Doherty,et al.  Parameter interdependence and uncertainty induced by lumping in a hydrologic model , 2007 .

[2]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[3]  Susan Cuddy,et al.  Risk management frameworks: supporting the next generation of Murray-Darling Basin water sharing plans , 2014 .

[4]  Philippe C. Baveye,et al.  Uncertainties in environmental modelling and consequences for policy making , 2009 .

[5]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[6]  Albert I. J. M. van Dijk,et al.  A review of historic and future hydrological changes in the Murray-Darling Basin , 2012 .

[7]  Grey S. Nearing,et al.  Comment on “A blueprint for process‐based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems” by Alberto Montanari and Demetris Koutsoyiannis , 2014 .

[8]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Global sensitivity measures from given data , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  I. Sobol.  Uniformly distributed sequences with an additional uniform property , 1976 .

[10]  John Doherty,et al.  Two statistics for evaluating parameter identifiability and error reduction , 2009 .

[11]  Improving parameter estimation in transient groundwater models through temporal differencing , 2011 .

[12]  M. Morrison,et al.  Economic Valuation of Environmental Benefits in the Murray-Darling Basin , 2010 .

[13]  Ming Ye,et al.  Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy , 2012 .

[14]  Luc Devroye,et al.  Nonparametric Density Estimation , 1985 .

[15]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  A new uncertainty importance measure , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Integrated assessment modelling for water resource allocation and management: A generalised conceptual framework , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[17]  Kerrie M. Tomkins,et al.  Uncertainty in streamflow rating curves: methods, controls and consequences , 2014 .

[18]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Understanding the sources of uncertainty to reduce the risks of undesirable outcomes in large-scale freshwater ecosystem restoration projects: An example from the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia , 2013 .

[19]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Numerical and visual evaluation of hydrological and environmental models using the Monte Carlo analysis toolbox , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[20]  L. Devroye,et al.  Nonparametric density estimation : the L[1] view , 1987 .

[21]  V. Janssen.  Indirect Tracking of Drop Bears Using GNSS Technology , 2012 .

[22]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  A blueprint for process‐based modeling of uncertain hydrological systems , 2012 .

[23]  Jai Vaze,et al.  An automated multi-step calibration procedure for a river system model , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[24]  Jin Teng,et al.  An integrated modelling framework for regulated river systems , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  S. Tarantola,et al.  Moment Independent Importance Measures: New Results and Analytical Test Cases , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Robert A. Cribbie,et al.  Exploring the Utility , 2014 .

[27]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 1995, Oper. Res..

[28]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  A generalised conceptual framework for integrated assessment modelling of water allocation issues , 2004 .

[29]  Ang Yang,et al.  A Daily River System Model for the Murray-Darling Basin: Development, Testing and Implementation , 2012 .

[30]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and testing of a distributed hydrological model using error‐based weighting and one objective function , 2009 .

[31]  G. Fu,et al.  Sobol′’s sensitivity analysis for a distributed hydrological model of Yichun River Basin, China , 2013 .

[32]  Luk Peeters,et al.  Conceptual evaluation of continental land-surface model behaviour , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[33]  Susan Cuddy,et al.  Approaches to distributed execution of hydrologic models: methods for ensemble Monte Carlo risk modelling with and without workflows , 2013 .

[34]  Exploring the utility of multi-response calibration in river system modelling , 2011 .

[35]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[36]  L. Devroye,et al.  Nonparametric Density Estimation: The L 1 View. , 1985 .

[37]  L. Crase,et al.  The impact of water quality and water level on the recreation values of Lake Hume , 2008 .

[38]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[39]  Willy Bauwens,et al.  Sobol' sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[40]  F. L. Dimet,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation for distributed hydrological modeling: potential of variational methods , 2009 .

[41]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Effective Groundwater Model Calibration , 2007 .

[42]  Vladimir U. Smakhtin,et al.  Hydrological Modeling of Large river Basins: How Much is Enough? , 2014, Water Resources Management.