Estimating phylogenetic relationships despite discordant gene trees across loci: the species tree of a diverse species group of feather mites (Acari: Proctophyllodidae)

SUMMARY With the increased availability of multilocus sequence data, the lack of concordance of gene trees estimated for independent loci has focused attention on both the biological processes producing the discord and the methodologies used to estimate phylogenetic relationships. What has emerged is a suite of new analytical tools for phylogenetic inference – species tree approaches. In contrast to traditional phylogenetic methods that are stymied by the idiosyncrasies of gene trees, approaches for estimating species trees explicitly take into account the cause of discord among loci and, in the process, provides a direct estimate of phylogenetic history (i.e. the history of species divergence, not divergence of specific loci). We illustrate the utility of species tree estimates with an analysis of a diverse group of feather mites, the pinnatus species group (genus Proctophyllodes). Discord among four sequenced nuclear loci is consistent with theoretical expectations, given the short time separating speciation events (as evident by short internodes relative to terminal branch lengths in the trees). Nevertheless, many of the relationships are well resolved in a Bayesian estimate of the species tree; the analysis also highlights ambiguous aspects of the phylogeny that require additional loci. The broad utility of species tree approaches is discussed, and specifically, their application to groups with high speciation rates – a history of diversification with particular prevalence in host/parasite systems where species interactions can drive rapid diversification.

[1]  A. Peterson,et al.  CALIBRATING DIVERGENCE TIMES ON SPECIES TREES VERSUS GENE TREES: IMPLICATIONS FOR SPECIATION HISTORY OF APHELOCOMA JAYS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  Qixin He,et al.  Sources of error inherent in species-tree estimation: impact of mutational and coalescent effects on accuracy and implications for choosing among different methods. , 2010, Systematic biology.

[3]  D. Otte,et al.  Testing for biogeographic mechanisms promoting divergence in Caribbean crickets (genus Amphiacusta) , 2010 .

[4]  A. Drummond,et al.  Bayesian Inference of Species Trees from Multilocus Data , 2009, Molecular biology and evolution.

[5]  Scott V Edwards,et al.  Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees. , 2009, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[6]  L. Stein,et al.  Species trees from highly incongruent gene trees in rice. , 2009, Systematic biology.

[7]  John E McCormack,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. , 2009, Systematic biology.

[8]  L. Knowles Estimating species trees: methods of phylogenetic analysis when there is incongruence across genes. , 2009, Systematic biology.

[9]  L. Knowles,et al.  What is the danger of the anomaly zone for empirical phylogenetics? , 2009, Systematic biology.

[10]  Patricia A. McLenachan,et al.  A Statistical Approach for Distinguishing Hybridization and Incomplete Lineage Sorting , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Noah A Rosenberg,et al.  Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Bryan C. Carstens,et al.  Does gene flow destroy phylogenetic signal? The performance of three methods for estimating species phylogenies in the presence of gene flow. , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[13]  R. T. Brumfield,et al.  Comparison of species tree methods for reconstructing the phylogeny of bearded manakins (Aves: Pipridae, Manacus) from multilocus sequence data. , 2008, Systematic biology.

[14]  L. Lacey Knowles,et al.  Resolving Species Phylogenies of Recent Evolutionary Radiations1 , 2008 .

[15]  S. V. Mironov,et al.  A New Species of the Genus Proctophyllodes (Analgoidea: Proctophyllodidae) from Cetti's Warbler Cettia cetti (Passeriformes: Sylviidae) with DNA Barcode Data , 2008 .

[16]  P. Klimov,et al.  Origin and higher-level relationships of psoroptidian mites (Acari: Astigmata: Psoroptidia): evidence from three nuclear genes. , 2008, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[17]  C. Moritz,et al.  Multilocus phylogenetics of a rapid radiation in the genus Thomomys (Rodentia: Geomyidae). , 2008, Systematic biology.

[18]  Elchanan Mossel,et al.  Incomplete Lineage Sorting: Consistent Phylogeny Estimation from Multiple Loci , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.

[19]  D. Pearl,et al.  Species trees from gene trees: reconstructing Bayesian posterior distributions of a species phylogeny using estimated gene tree distributions. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[20]  Bryan C Carstens,et al.  Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[21]  D. Pearl,et al.  High-resolution species trees without concatenation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  L. Kubatko,et al.  Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. , 2007, Systematic biology.

[23]  R. Gutell,et al.  Characteristics of the nuclear (18S, 5.8S, 28S and 5S) and mitochondrial (12S and 16S) rRNA genes of Apis mellifera (Insecta: Hymenoptera): structure, organization, and retrotransposable elements , 2006, Insect molecular biology.

[24]  W. Maddison,et al.  Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[25]  Eric Vigoda,et al.  Phylogenetic MCMC Algorithms Are Misleading on Mixtures of Trees , 2005, Science.

[26]  James H. Degnan,et al.  GENE TREE DISTRIBUTIONS UNDER THE COALESCENT PROCESS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  D. Posada,et al.  Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of akaike information criterion and bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. , 2004, Systematic biology.

[28]  James M. Pflug,et al.  Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution , 2001 .

[29]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  Nan Yu,et al.  The Comparative RNA Web (CRW) Site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.

[31]  Bin Ma,et al.  From Gene Trees to Species Trees , 2000, SIAM J. Comput..

[32]  J. Sabina,et al.  Expanded sequence dependence of thermodynamic parameters improves prediction of RNA secondary structure. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  N. Takahata Gene genealogy in three related populations: consistency probability between gene and population trees. , 1989, Genetics.

[34]  Laura Kubatko,et al.  Estimating species trees : practical and theoretical aspects , 2010 .

[35]  Graziano Pesole,et al.  BMC Evolutionary Biology BioMed Central , 2007 .

[36]  M. Guzy,et al.  Health Survey of House Finches (Carpodacus mexicanus) from Wisconsin , 2004, Avian diseases.

[37]  J. Seoane,et al.  Showiness, non-parasitic symbionts, and nutritional condition in a passerine bird , 1999 .

[38]  W. T. Atyeo,et al.  The Feather Mite Genus Proctophyllodes( Sarcoptiformes: Proctopbyllodidae ) , 1966 .