Sick sinus syndrome.

Sinus-node dysfunction is common in the elderly and, in most cases, does not cause any symptoms. Despite the high number of laboratory investigations, most diagnoses of sinus-node dysfunction are made by 12-lead electrocardiography, which shows severe sinus bradycardia, sinus arrest, or sinoatrial block. Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, exercise testing, and electrophysiologic investigations (including pharmacologic interventions to cause complete autonomic blockade) are sometimes useful in detecting transient or latent sinus-node abnormalities. The term sick sinus syndrome should be reserved for patients with symptomatic sinus-node dysfunction. Sick sinus syndrome has a protean presentation with variable degrees of clinical severity. Symptoms are often intermittent, changeable, and unpredictable. Because these symptoms can be observed in several other diseases, none are specific to sick sinus syndrome. Owing to the nonspecific nature of its symptoms, sick sinus syndrome can be diagnosed only when clear electrocardiographic signs corroborate symptoms. In the absence of a demonstrable link between signs and symptoms, a diagnosis can be presumed only when signs of severe sinus dysfunction are present and when every other possible cause of symptoms has been excluded carefully. Sinus-node dysfunction frequently is associated with diseases of the autonomic nervous system, and autonomic reflexes play a major role in the genesis of syncope. Survival does not seem to be affected by sick sinus syndrome. Atrioventricular block, chronic atrial fibrillation, and systemic embolism are major pathologic conditions that affect the outcome of the syndrome. Treatment should be aimed at controlling morbidity and relieving symptoms. Cardiac pacing is the most powerful therapy; physiologic pacing (atrial or dual-chamber) has been shown definitively to be superior to ventricular pacing.

[1]  A. George,et al.  Congenital sick sinus syndrome caused by recessive mutations in the cardiac sodium channel gene (SCN5A). , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[2]  L. Hatle,et al.  Prospective study on the occurrence and management of chronic sinoatrial disease, with follow-up. , 1974, British heart journal.

[3]  B. Lown Electrical reversion of cardiac arrhythmias. , 1967, British heart journal.

[4]  T. Bashour Classificaion of sinus node dysfunction , 1985 .

[5]  H. Volkmann,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity , 1990, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[6]  R. Gillum,et al.  The epidemiology of resting heart rate in a national sample of men and women: associations with hypertension, coronary heart disease, blood pressure, and other cardiovascular risk factors. , 1988, American heart journal.

[7]  J. Bigger,et al.  Premature Atrial Stimulation as a Key to the Understanding of Sinoatrial Conduction in Man: Presentation of Data and Critical Review of the Literature , 1973, Circulation.

[8]  G. Divine,et al.  Incremental diagnostic yield of loop electrocardiographic recorders in unexplained syncope. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  R. Desanctis,et al.  Clinical Spectrum of the Sick Sinus Syndrome , 1972, Circulation.

[10]  Williams Ln Semi-security and psychiatric hospitals. , 1974 .

[11]  A. D. Jose,et al.  The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man. , 1970, Cardiovascular research.

[12]  A. Fitzpatrick,et al.  TILTING TOWARDS A DIAGNOSIS IN RECURRENT UNEXPLAINED SYNCOPE , 1989, The Lancet.

[13]  E. Gang,et al.  Appropriate Diagnostic Studies for Sinus Node Dysfunction , 1985, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  P. Bjerregaard,et al.  Minimal heart rates and longest pauses in healthy adult subjects on two occasions eight years apart. , 1989, European heart journal.

[15]  L. Jordaens,et al.  Report of a study group on ablate and pace therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Barcelona Discussion Group. Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. , 1999, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[16]  L. Thuesen,et al.  Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome , 1994, The Lancet.

[17]  P. Samet,et al.  Electrophysiologic evaluation of elderly patients with sinus bradycardia: a long-term follow-up study. , 2020, Annals of internal medicine.

[18]  M Gent,et al.  Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes , 2000 .

[19]  N. Janz,et al.  Symptomatic Bradyarrhythmias in the Adult: Natural History Following Ventricular Pacemaker Implantation , 1982, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[20]  S. Yeh,et al.  Sinus automaticity and sinoatrial conduction in severe symptomatic sick sinus syndrome. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  P. Probst,et al.  Electrophysiologic Findings in Carotid Sinus Massage , 1983, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[22]  L. Crown,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of sick sinus syndrome. , 2003, American family physician.

[23]  J. Balachander,et al.  Sinus node function after autonomic blockade in normals and in sick sinus syndrome. , 1984, International journal of cardiology.

[24]  R. Kenny,et al.  The Natural History of Sick Sinus Syndrome , 1986, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[25]  J. Linhart,et al.  A New Method for Measurement of Sinoatrial Conduction Time , 1978, Circulation.

[26]  R. Cappato,et al.  Bedside evaluation of sinus bradycardia: usefulness of atropine test in discriminating organic from autonomic involvement of sinus automaticity. , 1987, American heart journal.

[27]  J. Kantelip,et al.  Findings on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in subjects older than 80 years. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[28]  M. Brignole,et al.  Neurally mediated syncope detected by carotid sinus massage and head-up tilt test in sick sinus syndrome. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  M. Brignole,et al.  An abnormal neural reflex plays a role in causing syncope in sinus bradycardia. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  C. M. Chen,et al.  The sick sinus syndrome: natural history of dysfunction of the sinoatrial node. , 1977, Chest.

[31]  P. Samet,et al.  Significance of the Sinus‐Node Recovery Time , 1972, Circulation.

[32]  P. Denes,et al.  Carotid sinus hypersensitivity in patients with unexplained syncope: clinical, electrophysiologic, and long-term follow-up observations. , 1988, American heart journal.

[33]  J. Gowers,et al.  Survival in sinoatrial disorder (sick-sinus syndrome). , 1980, British medical journal.

[34]  R. Rifkin,et al.  Operational definition of normal sinus heart rate. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[35]  R. Cappato,et al.  Role of sinus node artery disease in sick sinus syndrome in inferior wall acute myocardial infarction. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[36]  S. Rahimtoola,et al.  Characterisation of heart rate response to exercise in the sick sinus syndrome. , 1978, British heart journal.

[37]  R. Yee,et al.  Electrophysiologic mechanisms: sinus node dysfunction. , 1987, Circulation.

[38]  J Brandt,et al.  Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. , 1988, American heart journal.

[39]  A. Leatham Carotid sinus syncope. , 1982, British heart journal.

[40]  M. I. Ferrer The sick sinus syndrome. , 1980, Hospital practice.

[41]  L. Thuesen,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome , 1997, The Lancet.

[42]  N. S. Agruss,et al.  Significance of Chronic Sinus Bradycardia in Elderly People , 1972, Circulation.

[43]  G. Flaker,et al.  Arrhythmias associated with sinus node dysfunction. Pathogenesis, recognition, and management. , 1983, JAMA.

[44]  F. Jaeger,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Syncope in Paced Patients with Sick Sinus Syndrome , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[45]  M. Brignole,et al.  Pacing for Carotid Sinus Syndrome and Sick Sinus Syndrome , 1990, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[46]  J. Stone,et al.  Dual chamber sequential pacing management of sinus node dysfunction: advantages over single-chamber pacing. , 1982, American heart journal.

[47]  W. Kapoor Diagnostic evaluation of syncope. , 1991, The American journal of medicine.

[48]  C. Gornick,et al.  Indications for electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and assessment of sinus node dysfunction. , 1987, Circulation.

[49]  R. Kenny,et al.  Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome. , 1988, British heart journal.

[50]  G. Klein,et al.  The diagnostic sensitivity of electrophysiologic testing in patients with syncope caused by transient bradycardia. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[51]  M. Brignole,et al.  The natural course of untreated sick sinus syndrome and identification of the variables predictive of unfavorable outcome. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[52]  A. Camm,et al.  Ventricular Pacing for Sick Sinus Syndrome‐A Risky Business? , 1990, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[53]  G. Flaker,et al.  Comparative survival following permanent ventricular and dual-chamber pacing for patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. , 1987, American heart journal.

[54]  I. Ito,et al.  Assessment by autonomic blockade of age-related changes of the sinus node function and autonomic regulation in sick sinus syndrome. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[55]  M. Brignole,et al.  The use of atrial pacing to induce atrial fibrillation and flutter. , 1986, International journal of cardiology.

[56]  A. Masoni,et al.  Electrophysiology of Normal Sinus Node With and Without Autonomic Blockade , 1982, Circulation.

[57]  Ferrer Mi The Sick Sinus Syndrome in Atrial Disease , 1968 .

[58]  L. Thuesen,et al.  Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. , 1998, Circulation.

[59]  M. Scheinman,et al.  Graded exercise testing in patients with sinus node dysfunction. , 1977, The American journal of medicine.

[60]  A. Masoni,et al.  Latent abnormalities of sinus node function in patients with organic heart disease and normal sinus node on clinical basis. , 1984, Journal of electrocardiology.

[61]  L. Goldman,et al.  Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. , 1998, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[62]  J. Blanc,et al.  [Sinus disease and sino-carotidian hypersensitivity: an electrophysiological study (author's transl)]. , 1979, Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie.

[63]  R. Cappato,et al.  Effects of permanent pacemaker and oral theophylline in sick sinus syndrome the THEOPACE study: a randomized controlled trial. , 1997, Circulation.

[64]  J. Talano,et al.  Current concepts in sick sinus syndrome. II. ECG manifestation and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. , 1985, Archives of internal medicine.

[65]  J. A. Gomes,et al.  The Sinus Node Electrogram in Patients With and Without Sick Sinus Syndrome: Techniques and Correlation Between Directly Measured and Indirectl Estimated Sinoatrial Conduction Time , 1982, Circulation.