Defect interpolation in digital radiography: how object-oriented transform coding helps

Today's solid state flat panel radiography detectors provide images which contain artifacts caused by lines, columns and clusters of inactive pixels. If not too large, such defects can be filled by interpolation algorithms which usually work in the spatial domain. This paper describes an alternative spectral domain approach to defect interpolation. The acquired radiograph is modeled as the undistorted image multiplied by a known binary defect window. The window effect is then removed by deconvolving the window spectrum from the spectrum of the observed, distorted radiograph. The basic ingredient of our interpolation algorithm is an earlier approach to block transform coding of arbitrarily shaped image segments, that extrapolates the segment internal intensities over a block into which the segment is embedded. For defect interpolation, the arbitrarily shaped segment is formed by a local image region with defects, thus turning extrapolation into defect interpolation. Our algorithm reconstructs both oriented structures and noise- like information in a natural-looking manner, even for large defects. Moreover, our concept can also be applied to non- binary defect windows, e.g. for gain correction.

[1]  J. Cadzow,et al.  An extrapolation procedure for band-limited signals , 1979 .

[2]  T Aach,et al.  Digital radiography enhancement by nonlinear multiscale processing. , 2000, Medical physics.

[3]  Til Aach,et al.  Noise-resistant weak-structure enhancement for digital radiography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[4]  Laurent Simon,et al.  Evaluation of a fluoroscopy mode for a CCD-based radiographic sensor , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[5]  A. Papoulis,et al.  Detection of hidden periodicities by adaptive extrapolation , 1979 .

[6]  Til Aach,et al.  Digital image acquisition and processing in medical x-ray imaging , 1999, J. Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Rudolf Mester,et al.  Region Based Image Representation With Variable Reconstruction Quality , 1988, Other Conferences.

[8]  Hong Liu,et al.  Comparison of adaptive linear interpolation and conventional linear interpolation for digital radiography systems , 2000, J. Electronic Imaging.

[9]  Wilfried Philips A comparison of four hybrid block/object image coders , 1996, Signal Process..

[10]  Norbert Conrads,et al.  Dynamic x-ray imaging system based on an amorphous silicon thin-film array , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Til Aach,et al.  Coding of segmented images using shape-independent basis functions , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[12]  Gerhard Spekowius,et al.  Simulation of the imaging performance of x-ray image intensifier/TV camera chains , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[13]  Uwe Dr.-Ing. Franke Selective deconvolution: A new approach to extrapolation and spectral analysis of discrete signals , 1987, ICASSP '87. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[14]  A. Papoulis A new algorithm in spectral analysis and band-limited extrapolation. , 1975 .

[15]  Homer H. Chen,et al.  A block transform coder for arbitrarily shaped image segments , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Flat Panel Detectors for Digital Radiography , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew G. Davies,et al.  Simulation of the image quality of an a-Si flat x-ray detector system in low-dose fluoroscopic applications , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[18]  Til Aach,et al.  An Efficient Approach to Extrapolation and Spectral Analysis of Discrete Signals , 1990, ASST.