Understanding the Effects of Personalization as a Privacy Calculus: Analyzing Self-Disclosure Across Health, News, and Commerce Contexts†

The privacy calculus suggests that online self-disclosure is based on a cost–benefit trade-off. However, although companies progressively collect information to offer tailored services, the effect of both personalization and context-dependency on self-disclosure has remained understudied. Building on the privacy calculus, we hypothesized that benefits, privacy costs, and trust would predict online self-disclosure. Moreover, we analyzed the impact of personalization, investigating whether effects would differ for health, news, and commercial websites. Results from an online experiment using a representative Dutch sample (N = 1,131) supported the privacy calculus, revealing that it was stable across contexts. Personalization decreased trust slightly and benefits marginally. Interestingly, these effects were context-dependent: While personalization affected outcomes in news and commerce contexts, no effects emerged in the health context.

[1]  L. Baruh,et al.  Online Privacy Concerns and Privacy Management: A Meta-Analytical Review , 2017 .

[2]  Rathindra Sarathy,et al.  The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[3]  Hoang Manh Quyet,et al.  Users' intention to disclose location on location-based social network sites (LBSNS) in mobile environment: privacy calculus and Big Five , 2017, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[4]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for SNSs: Analyzing Self-Disclosure and Self-Withdrawal in a Representative U.S. Sample , 2016, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Daniel J. Veit,et al.  Beyond the Personalization–Privacy Paradox: Privacy Valuation, Transparency Features, and Service Personalization , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Advertising's imbroglio , 1999 .

[7]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[8]  Monika Taddicken,et al.  The 'Privacy Paradox' in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure1 , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  R. Laufer,et al.  Privacy as a Concept and a Social Issue: A Multidimensional Developmental Theory , 1977 .

[10]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Miriam J. Metzger.  Privacy, Trust, and Disclosure: Exploring Barriers to Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Yuan Li,et al.  Empirical Studies on Online Information Privacy Concerns: Literature Review and an Integrative Framework , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[14]  Yiwen Gao,et al.  International Journal of Medical Informatics , 2016 .

[15]  Richard Fletcher,et al.  The Impact of Trust in the News Media on Online News Consumption and Participation , 2017 .

[16]  D. Mahr,et al.  Unraveling the personalization paradox: The effect of information collection and trust-building strategies on online advertisement effectiveness , 2015 .

[17]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[18]  Ohbyung Kwon,et al.  A privacy-aware feature selection method for solving the personalization-privacy paradox in mobile wellness healthcare services , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Privacy in Context - Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life , 2009 .

[21]  David G. Taylor,et al.  Privacy concern and online personalization: The moderating effects of information control and compensation , 2009, Electron. Commer. Res..

[22]  S. C. Boerman,et al.  Exploring Motivations for Online Privacy Protection Behavior: Insights From Panel Data , 2018, Communication Research.

[23]  Xinran Lehto,et al.  E-PERSONALIZATION AND ONLINE PRIVACY FEATURES: THE CASE WITH TRAVEL WEBSITES , 2009 .

[24]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Privacy and human behavior in the age of information , 2015, Science.

[25]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[26]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics , 2013 .

[27]  Ying Mai Kung,et al.  A model of tailoring effects: A randomized controlled trial examining the mechanisms of tailoring in a web-based STD screening intervention. , 2016, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[28]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  The Psychological Appeal of Personalized Content in Web Portals: Does Customization Affect Attitudes and Behavior? , 2006 .

[29]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[30]  Michel Walrave,et al.  Predicting Adolescents' Disclosure of Personal Information in Exchange for Commercial Incentives: An Application of an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[31]  Eli Pariser,et al.  The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You , 2011 .

[32]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  The personalization privacy paradox: An exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[33]  Nima Kordzadeh,et al.  Antecedents of privacy calculus components in virtual health communities , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[34]  C. Anderson.  Between creative and quantified audiences: Web metrics and changing patterns of newswork in local US newsrooms , 2011 .

[35]  Mariko Morimoto,et al.  Stay Away From Me , 2012 .

[36]  Maik Eisenbeiss,et al.  The Importance of Trust for Personalized Online Advertising , 2015 .

[37]  Hilde A. M. Voorveld,et al.  Understanding online behavioural advertising: User knowledge, privacy concerns and online coping behaviour in Europe , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  D. Lakens.  Performing High-Powered Studies Efficiently with Sequential Analyses , 2014 .

[39]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[40]  Jari Vesanen.  What is personalization? A conceptual framework , 2007 .

[41]  S. Jourard.  The Transparent Self , 1964 .

[42]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  SOCIAL NETWORKS : WHY WE DISCLOSE , 2012 .

[43]  Sabine Trepte,et al.  Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in‐depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors , 2015 .

[44]  Mikko T. Siponen,et al.  New insights into the problem of software piracy: The effects of neutralization, shame, and moral beliefs , 2012, Inf. Manag..

[45]  Mayuram S. Krishnan,et al.  The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization , 2006, MIS Q..

[46]  Karolien Poels,et al.  Like or dislike? Adolescents’ responses to personalized social network site advertising , 2018 .