Learning and Teaching Science as Inquiry: A Case Study of Elementary School Teachers' Investigations of Light.

This case study documents an example of inquiry learning and teaching during a summer institute for elementary and middle school teachers. A small group constructed an explanatory model for an intriguing optical phenomenon that they were observing. Research questions included: What physics thinking did the learners express? What aspects of scientific inquiry were evident in what the learners said and did? What questions did the learners ask one another as they worked? How did these learners collaborate in constructing understanding? How did the instructor foster their learning? Data sources included video- and audio- tapes of instruction, copies of the participants' writings and drawings, field notes, interviews, and staff reflections. An interpretative narrative of what three group members said and did presents a detailed account of their learning process. Analyses of their utterances provide evidence of physics thinking, scientific inquiry, questioning, collaborative sense making, and insight into ways to foster inquiry learning. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed89:1007–1042, 2005

[1]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .

[2]  L. Viennot,et al.  Reading images in optics: Students' difficulties and teachers' views , 2002 .

[3]  D. Hodson,et al.  Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know , 2001 .

[4]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Transformative Communication as a Cultural Tool for Guiding Inquiry Science. , 2001 .

[5]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science , 2001 .

[6]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[7]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[8]  M. Linn,et al.  Computers, Teachers, Peers: Science Learning Partners , 2000 .

[9]  E. V. Zee,et al.  Analysis of a student-generated inquiry discussion , 2000 .

[10]  Kathleen Hogan.  Thinking Aloud Together: A Test of an Intervention to Foster Students' Collaborative Scientific Reasoning , 1999 .

[11]  Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar,et al.  Developing Scientific Communities in Classrooms: A Sociocognitive Approach , 1999 .

[12]  J. Osborne,et al.  The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .

[13]  D. Ball,et al.  Beyond Being Told Not to Tell , 1999 .

[14]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[15]  Miriam Reiner,et al.  Thought experiments and collaborative learning in physics , 1998 .

[16]  Jim Minstrell,et al.  Using Questioning to Guide Student Thinking , 1997 .

[17]  Karen Meyer,et al.  Consensually Driven Explanation in Science Teaching. , 1997 .

[18]  Emily H. van Zee,et al.  Reflective discourse: developing shared understandings in a physics classroom , 1997 .

[19]  Jay A. Young,et al.  Chemical Safety. Part II: Tips for Dealing with Laboratory Hazards. , 1997 .

[20]  M. Iwasyk.  Kids Questioning Kids: "Experts" Sharing. , 1997 .

[21]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Teacher questioning in an open‐inquiry learning environment: Interactions of context, content, and student responses , 1996 .

[22]  David Hammer,et al.  Student Inquiry in a Physics Class Discussion , 1995 .

[23]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[24]  Karen Gallas,et al.  Talking their way into science : hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula , 1995 .

[25]  N. Brickhouse.  Children's observations, ideas, and the development of classroom theories about light , 1994 .

[26]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[27]  C. Bereiter.  Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse , 1994 .

[28]  Bonnie Shapiro,et al.  What Children Bring to Light: A Constructivist Perspective on Children's Learning in Science. Ways of Knowing in Science Series. , 1994 .

[29]  Fred M. Goldberg,et al.  Prospective elementary teachers' prior knowledge about light , 1993 .

[30]  D. Kuhn.  Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .

[31]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[32]  Gerry Philipsen,et al.  Speaking Culturally: Explorations in Social Communication , 1992 .

[33]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Students' understanding of light and its properties: Teaching to engender conceptual change , 1992 .

[34]  J. Roschelle.  Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[35]  Priscilla W. Laws,et al.  Calculus‐Based Physics Without Lectures , 1991 .

[36]  Andra A. DiSessa.  Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[37]  Lillian C. McDermott,et al.  A perspective on teacher preparation in physics and other sciences: The need for special science courses for teachers , 1990 .

[38]  J. Lemke.  Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[39]  Derek Hodson,et al.  Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum , 1988 .

[40]  E. Feher,et al.  Pinholes and images: Children's conceptions of light and vision. I , 1987 .

[41]  Fred M. Goldberg,et al.  An investigation of student understanding of the real image formed by a converging lens or concave mirror , 1987 .

[42]  R. Driver,et al.  Children's Ideas in Science , 1985 .

[43]  Louis T. Milic,et al.  Interrogativity : a colloquium on the grammar, typology, and pragmatics of questions in seven diverse languages, Cleveland, Ohio, October 5th, 1981-May 3rd, 1982 , 1984 .

[44]  B. Andersson,et al.  How Swedish pupils, aged 12-15 years, understand light and its properties , 1983 .

[45]  D. Hymes.  The Ethnography Of Speaking , 1962 .

[46]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Physics and reality , 1936 .