Influence of Communication on Client Satisfaction in Information System Projects - An Expectation-Confirmation Approach

The problem of adequately measuring success of information system (IS) projects has not been sufficiently solved. Whereas the traditional approach of assessing IS project success in terms of adherence to budget, schedule and requirements is said to be insufficient, there is lack of agreement on a multidimensional approach using further or different criteria. As success is seen as matter of perspective, project stakeholders’ subjective perceptions of project success are supposed to be important criteria. Thereby, especially the satisfaction of the client organisation is relevant as it is crucial for the contractor’s reputation and assignments of follow-up projects. However, IS developing companies and success reports predominantly assess IS project success using only the objective adherence-to-planning criteria. We believe that client satisfaction in IS projects highly depends on the confirmation of client’s expectations concerning project (process and product) performance. We thus apply the Expectation-Confirmation Theory (ECT) to the context of IS projects aiming to explain the satisfaction of the client organisation. As managing expectations may influence satisfaction, we extend the ECT by client-vendor communication. We assume that client-vendor communication manages expectations, that is, it moderates the relationship between expectation and confirmation. We present and argue for our hypothesized model and according measures for a quantitative analysis. As our study is one of few focussing on the client perspective, we propose an innovative approach to further improve the understanding of IS project success.

[1]  Michael Sherwood-Smith,et al.  Maximise information systems value by continuous participative evaluation , 1999 .

[2]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Managerial Work: Analysis from Observation , 1971 .

[3]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[4]  Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson,et al.  Determining the Contribution of IS Projects: An Approach to Measure Performance , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Project success: a multidimensional, strategic concept , 1997, Innovation in Technology Management. The Key to Global Leadership. PICMET '97.

[7]  Walter Fernandez,et al.  Success in IT projects: A matter of definition? , 2008 .

[8]  B. N. Baker,et al.  Factors Affecting Project Success , 2008 .

[9]  Gary Klein,et al.  The Impact of Information System Personnel Skill Discrepancies on Stakeholder Satisfaction , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[10]  Barbara F Brice Understanding customer expectations of community pharmacy services , 2000 .

[11]  Urvashi Rathod,et al.  Defining ‘success’ for software projects: An exploratory revelation , 2006 .

[12]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Expectation confirmation: An examination of three competing models , 2008 .

[13]  R. Ryan Nelson,et al.  Project Retrospectives: Evaluating Project Success, Failure, and Everything in Between , 2005, MIS Q. Executive.

[14]  John D. Pettit,et al.  An Examination of Organizational Communication as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Job Performance and Job Satisfaction , 1997 .

[15]  Mohammad Alamgir Hossain,et al.  Expectation–Confirmation Theory in Information System Research: A Review and Analysis , 2012 .

[16]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Effect of Partnership Quality on IS Outsourcing Success: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Validation , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Lavagnon A. Ika Project Success as a Topic in Project Management Journals , 2009 .

[18]  Andrew Martin,et al.  A model of information systems development project performance , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[19]  Stacie Petter,et al.  Managing User Expectations on Software Projects: Lessons from the Trenches , 2008 .

[20]  Kam Jugdev,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[21]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[22]  David Gefen,et al.  What do software practitioners really think about project success: an exploratory study , 2005, J. Syst. Softw..

[23]  Mark Keil,et al.  How Software Project Risk Affects Project Performance: An Investigation of the Dimensions of Risk and an Exploratory Model , 2004, Decis. Sci..

[24]  Michael Cuellar,et al.  Assessing Project Success: Moving Beyond the Triple Constraint , 2010 .

[25]  James L. Garnett,et al.  Penetrating the Performance Predicament: Communication as a Mediator or Moderator of Organizational Culture’s Impact on Public Organizational Performance , 2008 .

[26]  Dirk Basten,et al.  Measurement of information system project success in organizations - what researchers can learn from practice , 2011, ECIS.

[27]  Dov Dvir,et al.  In search of project classification: a non-universal approach to project success factors , 1998 .

[28]  R. Walton,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. , 1966 .

[29]  Jeffrey K. Pinto The Elements of Project Success , 2007 .

[30]  John Wateridge,et al.  How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? , 1998 .

[31]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation , 2007, MIS Q..

[32]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Software engineering / Ian Sommerville. , 2011 .