Prediction under Uncertainty on a Mature Field

Reservoir engineering studies involve a large number of parameters with great uncertainties. To ensure correct future production, a comparison of possible scenarios in managing related uncertainties is needed. Comparisons can be performed with more information than only a single mean case for each scenario. The Bayesian formalism is well tailored to address the key problem of making predictions under uncertainty, especially in mature fields. It enables to define the reservoir uncertainty taking into account static and dynamic data. This posterior uncertainty can then be propagated to compute probabilistic production forecasts for each scenario, while honoring static and dynamic knowledge of the reservoir. But obtaining posterior uncertainty, as well as propagating it on production forecasts, entails a prohibitive number of reservoir simulations.In this paper, we propose an application of several advanced statistical techniques to perform prediction under uncertainty on a mature field using a reasonable number of simulations. The considered mature field is the PUNQS reservoir model which has been previously used in several comparison studies on uncertainty quantification and history-matching. A workflow based on three steps has been applied. First, a screening and a sensitivity analysis were performed to find the most influential parameters. Then, a probabilistic inversion method was used to reduce uncertainty on the parameters by estimating their posterior uncertainty. Finally, probabilistic predictions are computed by propagating the reduced uncertainty of parameters. In the first step of the workflow, two different sensitivity techniques are discussed and compared. One, more qualitative, based on the Morris method and another, more quantitative, based on Sobol’ indices. In the second step, a probabilistic history-matching procedure is applied to reduce the uncertainty. It is based on both a non parametric response surface approach which uses Gaussian process modeling and an adaptive design strategy. In the final step of the workflow, parametric response surfaces are used to approximate the reservoir production forecasts and obtain their probabilistic distribution by propagating the remaining posterior uncertainty of input parameters.

[1]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[2]  Albert Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problem theory - and methods for model parameter estimation , 2004 .

[3]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .

[4]  A. R. Syversveen,et al.  Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: a comparative study , 2001, Petroleum Geoscience.

[5]  Amandine Marrel Mise en oeuvre et utilisation du métamodèle processus gaussien pour l'analyse de sensibilité de modèles numériques : application à un code de transport hydrogéologique , 2008 .

[6]  T. J. Mitchell,et al.  Exploratory designs for computational experiments , 1995 .

[7]  Runze Li,et al.  Design and Modeling for Computer Experiments , 2005 .

[8]  R JonesDonald,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998 .

[9]  B. Efron,et al.  The Jackknife Estimate of Variance , 1981 .

[10]  William J. Welch,et al.  Computer experiments and global optimization , 1997 .

[11]  Isabelle Zabalza-Mezghani,et al.  Toward a Reliable Quantification of Uncertainty on Production Forecasts: Adaptive Experimental Designs , 2007 .

[12]  Henry P. Wynn,et al.  Screening, predicting, and computer experiments , 1992 .

[13]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  A. Saltelli,et al.  Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models , 1996 .

[15]  Daniel Busby,et al.  Hierarchical adaptive experimental design for Gaussian process emulators , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[16]  Mathieu Feraille,et al.  A030 UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR MATURE FIELD COMBINING THE BAYESIAN INVERSION FORMALISM AND EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN APPROACH , 2004 .

[17]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions , 1998, J. Glob. Optim..

[19]  Emmanuel Manceau,et al.  Uncertainty management: From geological scenarios to production scheme optimization , 2004 .

[20]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[21]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer by Andrea Saltelli, Marco Ratto, Terry Andres, Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, Debora Gatelli, Michaela Saisana, Stefano Tarantola , 2008 .

[22]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[23]  Jeremy E. Oakley,et al.  Bayesian Inference for the Uncertainty Distribution , 2000 .

[24]  A. Jourdan,et al.  ANALYSE STATISTIQUE ET ECHANTILLONNAGE D’EXPERIENCES SIMULEES , 2003 .

[25]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[26]  Daniel Busby,et al.  Uncertainty management on a reservoir workflow , 2009 .

[27]  Olivier Roustant,et al.  Calculations of Sobol indices for the Gaussian process metamodel , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  Bertrand Iooss Revue sur l’analyse de sensibilité globale de modèles numériques , 2011 .

[29]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 2003, Springer Series in Statistics.

[30]  D Busby,et al.  Adaptive design of experiments for calibration of complex simulators – An application to uncertainty quantification of a mature oil field , 2008 .

[31]  Céline Scheidt Analyse statistique d'expériences simulées : Modélisation adaptative de réponses non régulières par krigeage et plans d'expériences, Application à la quantification des incertitudes en ingénierie des réservoirs pétroliers , 2006 .

[32]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .