The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements.

Currently, cephalometric superimpositions are the accepted means for the assessment of orthodontic tooth movement. The present investigation evaluated the use of palatal rugae as reference points for the measurement of tooth movement, in a manner comparable with cephalometric superimpositions. The sample consisted of pretreatment and posttreatment maxillary study models and lateral cephalometric radiographs from 33 patients who had received orthodontic treatment that involved the extraction of the maxillary first permanent premolars. The mean age at the start of treatment was 13 years 11 months, and the average time between records was 35 months. The anteroposterior movement of the maxillary first molars and central incisors was evaluated with the use of 2 cephalometric variables and 12 study model variables that were reduced to 6 by the combining of the left and right sides. No statistical differences were found between the mean molar movement that was measured cephalometrically and the mean molar movement that was relative to the medial and lateral ends of the first and second palatal rugae or relative to the medial end of the third palatal ruga. Also, no statistical differences were found between the mean incisor movement that was measured cephalometrically and the mean incisor movement that was relative to the medial and lateral end of the third palatal ruga. These findings suggest that ruga landmarks can be used as reliably as cephalometric superimpositions to assess anteroposterior molar movements.

[1]  Frans P.G.M. van der Linden,et al.  Changes in the position of posterior teeth in relation to ruga points , 1978 .

[2]  L LYSELL,et al.  Plicae palatinae transversae and papilla incisiva in man; a morphologic and genetic study. , 1955, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[3]  J F Cleall,et al.  On-line computer system for the analysis of cephalometric radiographs. , 1976, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  C. Sadowsky,et al.  Efficacy of intraarch mechanics using differential moments for achieving anchorage control in extraction cases. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[5]  G. Kendrick,et al.  The effects of tooth movement on the palatine rugae. , 1967, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  G. Townsend,et al.  Palatal rugae patterns in Australian aborigines and Caucasians. , 1997, Australian dental journal.

[7]  K Kula,et al.  Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  L. Lebret Physiologic Tooth Migration , 1964, Journal of dental research.

[9]  R. M. Little,et al.  An investigation of maxillary superimposition techniques using metallic implants. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  H. Droschl,et al.  Distalization with a Nance appliance and coil springs. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[11]  M A Almeida,et al.  Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  Jørgensen Kd Investigations on the hardness and compressibility of model plaster. , 1954 .

[13]  L. Lebret,et al.  Growth Changes of the Palate , 1962 .