Canopy gap fraction estimation from digital hemispherical images using sky radiance models and a linear conversion method

Thresholding methods for estimating canopy indices from gamma corrected digital hemispherical images are influenced both by the image interpreter and applicability of the automatic interpretation algorithm. The matrix output data of camera sensors (i.e., raw data) can be used to avoid gamma correction. Nevertheless, the impact of an interpreter or a thresholding algorithm is still present. In this paper, we present a new methodology which applies a previously published linear conversion method of raw data to a single below-canopy image to obtain unbiased estimates of canopy gap fraction. The new methodology derives an above-canopy reference image from a below-canopy image using sky radiance information available in gaps. A sky radiance model and interpolation are used to create the above-canopy image which could alternatively be obtained with a second sensor. To evaluate the new method, we conducted test measurements in three mature forest stands. The comparison of image processing output to LAI-2000 Plant Canopy Analyzer data showed high agreement and repeatability. The proposed method can be applied in versatile future versions of hemispherical image analysis programs to create unbiased comparison data for other manual or automatic image processing methods designed for plant canopies.

[1]  Sven Wagner,et al.  Relative radiance measurements and zenith angle dependent segmentation in hemispherical photography , 2001 .

[2]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  Radiometric correction of hemispherical images , 2007 .

[3]  G. Russell,et al.  Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography , 1999 .

[4]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Direct and Indirect Estimation of Leaf Area Index, fAPAR, and Net Primary Production of Terrestrial Ecosystems , 1999 .

[5]  Richard Kittler,et al.  Some qualities of scattering functions defining sky radiance distributions , 1994 .

[6]  Pol Coppin,et al.  Assessment of automatic gap fraction estimation of forests from digital hemispherical photography , 2005 .

[7]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[8]  J. Norman,et al.  Instrument for Indirect Measurement of Canopy Architecture , 1991 .

[9]  R. Hall,et al.  A comparison of digital and film fisheye photography for analysis of forest canopy structure and gap light transmission , 2001 .

[10]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Leaf area index estimation of boreal forest using ENVISAT ASAR , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  The performance of foliage mass and crown radius models in forming the input of a forest reflectance model: A test on forest growth sample plots and Landsat 7 ETM+ images , 2007 .

[12]  Alessandro Cescatti,et al.  Indirect estimates of canopy gap fraction based on the linear conversion of hemispherical photographs Methodology and comparison with standard thresholding techniques , 2007 .

[13]  Sylvain G. Leblanc,et al.  Methodology comparison for canopy structure parameters extraction from digital hemispherical photography in boreal forests , 2005 .

[14]  Surapong Chirarattananon,et al.  Distributions of sky luminance and radiance of North Bangkok under standard distributions , 2007 .

[15]  S. T. Gower,et al.  Measurements of branch area and adjusting leaf area index indirect measurements , 1998 .

[16]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  Improved algorithm for estimating canopy indices from gap fraction data in forest canopies , 2004 .

[17]  Richard H. Grant,et al.  Obscured Overcast Sky Radiance Distributions for Ultraviolet and Photosynthetically Active Radiation , 1997 .

[18]  S. Leblanc,et al.  Derivation and validation of Canada-wide coarse-resolution leaf area index maps using high-resolution satellite imagery and ground measurements , 2002 .

[19]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Reduced simple ratio better than NDVI for estimating LAI in Finnish pine and spruce stands , 2004 .

[20]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Retrieval of leaf area index for a coniferous forest by inverting a forest reflectance model , 2005 .

[21]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Effects of image quality, size and camera type on forest light environment estimates using digital hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[22]  J. Olseth,et al.  Luminous efficacy models and their application for calculation of photosynthetically active radiation , 1994 .

[23]  L. Marklund,et al.  Biomass functions for pine, spruce and birch in Sweden , 1988 .

[24]  Raisa Mäkipää,et al.  Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe , 2005, Silva Fennica Monographs.

[25]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography , 2004 .

[26]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A dataset for the validation of reflectance models , 2009 .

[27]  Peter B. Catrysse,et al.  QE reduction due to pixel vignetting in CMOS image sensors , 2000, Electronic Imaging.

[28]  The brightness distribution of the overcast sky when the ground is snow-covered , 1955 .