Pixel to Patch Sampling Structure and Local Neighboring Intensity Relationship Patterns for Texture Classification

In this letter, we explore local image descriptors for texture classification. We mainly propose two novel contributions: an effective sampling structure based on Pixel To Patch (PTP) to mimic the retinal sampling pattern; and a novel Local Neighboring Intensity Relationship Pattern (LNIRP) descriptor to extract texture feature by exploring neighboring gray-scale properties. The LNIRP descriptor is extended by using the PTP sampling structure which aims to capture not only micro-patterns but also macro-patterns, while reducing feature dimensionality and improving computational efficiency. The proposed descriptor has advantages of computational simplicity, no texton dictionary learning step and training-free. Moreover, the LNIRP descriptor is complementary to the Local Binary Pattern (LBP) descriptor. Extensive experiments were conducted on Outex database to evaluate the proposed descriptor and sampling structure. The proposed descriptor can achieve superior classification performance compared to most of the state-of-the-art methods, including what we believe to be the best results reported for Outex, while offering a smallest feature dimension.

[1]  Liming Chen,et al.  Image region description using orthogonal combination of local binary patterns enhanced with color information , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[2]  Zhenhua Guo,et al.  A Completed Modeling of Local Binary Pattern Operator for Texture Classification , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Timothy A. Machado,et al.  Functional connectivity in the retina at the resolution of photoreceptors , 2010, Nature.

[4]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  B J Melloni,et al.  How the retina works. , 1971, American Family Physician.

[6]  Fakhry M. Khellah,et al.  Texture Classification Using Dominant Neighborhood Structure , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Zhenhua Guo,et al.  Rotation invariant texture classification using LBP variance (LBPV) with global matching , 2010, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  FREAK: Fast Retina Keypoint , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  DAISY: An Efficient Dense Descriptor Applied to Wide-Baseline Stereo , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Paul W. Fieguth,et al.  Extended local binary patterns for texture classification , 2012, Image Vis. Comput..

[11]  Xiaoyang Tan,et al.  Enhanced Local Texture Feature Sets for Face Recognition Under Difficult Lighting Conditions , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  A Statistical Approach to Material Classification Using Image Patch Exemplars , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Discriminative features for texture description , 2012, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  L. Thibos,et al.  Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. , 2002, Journal of refractive surgery.

[15]  Shengcai Liao,et al.  Learning Multi-scale Block Local Binary Patterns for Face Recognition , 2007, ICB.

[16]  Marko Heikkilä,et al.  Description of interest regions with local binary patterns , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Markov Random Field Texture Models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  Shu Liao,et al.  Dominant Local Binary Patterns for Texture Classification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.