Applying Empirical Methods in Clinical Practice: Introducing the Model for Assessing Treatment Effect

Background:One challenge in rehabilitation is determining whether improvement in the patient is a treatment-specific effect or due to extraneous factors (eg, the passage of time, spontaneous recovery). Design:Descriptive, model building, and 2 cases illustrating the model. Method:The Model for Assessing Treatment Effect (MATE) incorporates the conceptual frameworks of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF), along with single-case experimental methodology. Results:The MATE contains 7 levels organized in a hierarchy, representing (i) increasing specificity of evaluation procedures and (ii) control of extraneous variables during therapy. Two illustrative cases of patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing inpatient rehabilitation for, inter alia, cognitive-communication impairments are described to illustrate common clinical practice (level 2 of MATE) and a superior method using a multiple-baseline design across behaviors, enabling rigorous evaluation of treatment effect (level 6 of MATE). Conclusions:The MATE offers a systematic, evidence-based approach for implementing ICF-informed goals into clinical practice. It also provides a benchmark against which a clinical service can be evaluated in terms of the rigor of its therapy program.

[1]  D. Wade.  Applying the WHO ICF framework to the rehabilitation of patients with cognitive deficits , 2005 .

[2]  R. Tate,et al.  Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) to Clinical Practice and Research in Acquired Brain Impairment , 2008 .

[3]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Robert H. Horner,et al.  Single-Case Designs Technical Documentation. , 2010 .

[5]  M. Wolery,et al.  The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education , 2005 .

[6]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings , 2010 .

[7]  L. Worrall,et al.  Developing a Traumatic Brain Injury Index for Social and Vocational Communication Outcomes (SAVCO) , 2008 .

[8]  R. Bastiaanse,et al.  The training of verb production in Broca's aphasia: A multiple‐baseline across‐behaviours study , 2006 .

[9]  Leanne Togher,et al.  Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale , 2008, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[10]  T. Powell.  The Brain Injury Workbook: Exercises for Cognitive Rehabilitation , 2009 .

[11]  A. Lustig,et al.  A written communication strategy for a speaker with aphasia and apraxia of speech: Treatment outcomes and social validity , 2002 .

[12]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Determining optimal therapy--randomized trials in individual patients. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (January 2001) , 2014 .

[14]  S. Raman.  N of 1 randomized controlled trials. , 1988, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[15]  D. Barlow,et al.  Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change , 1976 .

[16]  P. Snow,et al.  Measuring perception of communicative ability: the development and evaluation of the La Trobe communication questionnaire , 2000 .

[17]  A. Boonen,et al.  The international classification for functioning, disability and health , 2007, Clinical Rheumatology.

[18]  T. B. Üstün,et al.  The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a new tool for understanding disability and health , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[19]  Tara L. Jeffs,et al.  Functional Communication in Individuals with Chronic Severe Aphasia Using Augmentative Communication , 2008, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[20]  Randall R. Robey,et al.  Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature , 2006, Neuropsychology Review.

[21]  T. Hopper,et al.  Conversational coaching: Treatment outcomes and future directions , 2002 .

[22]  Nick Alderman,et al.  Improvement of self-monitoring skills, reduction of behaviour disturbance and the dysexecutive syndrome: Comparison of response cost and a new programme of self-monitoring training , 1995 .

[23]  N. Alderman,et al.  The effectiveness of DRL in the management and treatment of severe behaviour disorders following brain injury. , 1997, Brain injury.

[24]  A. Cieza,et al.  The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): a unifying model for the conceptual description of the rehabilitation strategy. , 2007, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[25]  L. Hickson,et al.  The use of the ICF in speech-language pathology research: Towards a research agenda , 2008 .

[26]  W. Larrabee,et al.  Users' Guide to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice , 2002 .