Electromagnetic interference from radio frequency identification inducing potentially hazardous incidents in critical care medical equipment.

CONTEXT Health care applications of autoidentification technologies, such as radio frequency identification (RFID), have been proposed to improve patient safety and also the tracking and tracing of medical equipment. However, electromagnetic interference (EMI) by RFID on medical devices has never been reported. OBJECTIVE To assess and classify incidents of EMI by RFID on critical care equipment. DESIGN AND SETTING Without a patient being connected, EMI by 2 RFID systems (active 125 kHz and passive 868 MHz) was assessed under controlled conditions during May 2006, in the proximity of 41 medical devices (in 17 categories, 22 different manufacturers) at the Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Assessment took place according to an international test protocol. Incidents of EMI were classified according to a critical care adverse events scale as hazardous, significant, or light. RESULTS In 123 EMI tests (3 per medical device), RFID induced 34 EMI incidents: 22 were classified as hazardous, 2 as significant, and 10 as light. The passive 868-MHz RFID signal induced a higher number of incidents (26 incidents in 41 EMI tests; 63%) compared with the active 125-kHz RFID signal (8 incidents in 41 EMI tests; 20%); difference 44% (95% confidence interval, 27%-53%; P < .001). The passive 868-MHz RFID signal induced EMI in 26 medical devices, including 8 that were also affected by the active 125-kHz RFID signal (26 in 41 devices; 63%). The median distance between the RFID reader and the medical device in all EMI incidents was 30 cm (range, 0.1-600 cm). CONCLUSIONS In a controlled nonclinical setting, RFID induced potentially hazardous incidents in medical devices. Implementation of RFID in the critical care environment should require on-site EMI tests and updates of international standards.

[1]  W. Irnich,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference of Pacemakers by Mobile Phones , 1996, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[2]  S. Pinski,et al.  Interference with an implantable defibrillator by an electronic antitheft-surveillance device. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  K S Tan,et al.  Effects of a wireless local area network (LAN) system, a telemetry system, and electrosurgical devices on medical devices in a hospital environment. , 2000, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[4]  D L Hayes,et al.  Cellular phone interference with external cardiopulmonary monitoring devices. , 2001, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[5]  K. Nelson,et al.  Developing a comprehensive electronic adverse event reporting system in an academic health center. , 2002, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[6]  W. Irnich Electronic Security Systems and Active Implantable Medical Devices , 2002, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[7]  Nathan Lawrentschuk,et al.  Mobile phone interference with medical equipment and its clinical relevance: a systematic review , 2004, The Medical journal of Australia.

[8]  G. Gay,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the use of the M2A patency capsule system before a capsule endoscopy procedure, in patients with known or suspected intestinal stenosis. , 2005, Endoscopy.

[9]  J. Loeb,et al.  The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[10]  Mike Dempsey Weaving through the hopes and hype surrounding RFID. , 2005, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[11]  Mats K. E. B. Wallin,et al.  Modern Wireless Telecommunication Technologies and Their Electromagnetic Compatibility with Life-Supporting Equipment , 2005, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  Jeff Kabachinski,et al.  An introduction to RFID. , 2005, Biomedical instrumentation & technology.

[13]  P. Torkki,et al.  Time Accuracy of a Radio Frequency Identification Patient Tracking System for Recording Operating Room Timestamps , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[14]  Alex Macario,et al.  Initial clinical evaluation of a handheld device for detecting retained surgical gauze sponges using radiofrequency identification technology. , 2006, Archives of surgery.

[15]  Donna Young RFID implementation not moving fast enough, FDA says. , 2006, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[16]  Suhong Li,et al.  Radio Frequency Identification Applications in Hospital Environments , 2006, Hospital topics.

[17]  Jesus J. Caban,et al.  Radio Frequency Identification Systems Technology in the Surgical Setting , 2006, Surgical innovation.

[18]  Takashi Hasegawa,et al.  Efficiency and Safety of New Radiofrequency Identification System in Japanese Hospital , 2007, MedInfo.

[19]  Marcus J Schultz,et al.  Interference by new-generation mobile phones on critical care medical equipment , 2007, Critical care.

[20]  Marie T Egan,et al.  Auto Identification Technology and Its Impact on Patient Safety in the Operating Room of the Future , 2007, Surgical innovation.

[21]  Aviv S Gladman,et al.  Wireless technology in the ICU: boon or ban? , 2007, Critical care.

[22]  S. Dzik,et al.  Radio frequency identification for prevention of bedside errors , 2007, Transfusion.

[23]  Ann Ferriter,et al.  Radiofrequency identification technology in health care: benefits and potential risks. , 2007, JAMA.

[24]  Dan W. Reicher,et al.  Use of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Tags in Bedside Monitoring of Endotracheal Tube Position , 2007, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[25]  D. Oleynikov,et al.  Radio frequency identification (RFID) applied to surgical sponges , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.