Co-Processing Agricultural Residues and Wet Organic Waste Can Produce Lower-Cost Carbon-Negative Fuels and Bioplastics

Scalable, low-cost biofuel and biochemical production can accelerate progress on the path to a more circular carbon economy and reduced dependence on crude oil. Rather than producing a single fuel product, lignocellulosic biorefineries have the potential to serve as hubs for the production of fuels, production of petrochemical replacements, and treatment of high-moisture organic waste. A detailed techno-economic analysis and life-cycle greenhouse gas assessment are developed to explore the cost and emission impacts of integrated corn stover-to-ethanol biorefineries that incorporate both codigestion of organic wastes and different strategies for utilizing biogas, including onsite energy generation, upgrading to bio-compressed natural gas (bioCNG), conversion to poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) bioplastic, and conversion to single-cell protein (SCP). We find that codigesting manure or a combination of manure and food waste alongside process wastewater can reduce the biorefinery’s total costs per metric ton of CO2 equivalent mitigated by half or more. Upgrading biogas to bioCNG is the most cost-effective climate mitigation strategy, while upgrading biogas to PHB or SCP is competitive with combusting biogas onsite.

[1]  J. Keasling,et al.  Sustainable manufacturing with synthetic biology , 2022, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  R. Langer,et al.  Bioplastics for a circular economy , 2022, Nature Reviews Materials.

[3]  L. Lynd,et al.  Toward low-cost biological and hybrid biological/catalytic conversion of cellulosic biomass to fuels , 2022, Energy & Environmental Science.

[4]  S. Jordaan,et al.  Designing an Innovation System to Support Profitable Electro- and Bio-catalytic Carbon Upgrade , 2022, Energy & Environmental Science.

[5]  Evan D. Sherwin,et al.  Displacing fishmeal with protein derived from stranded methane , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[6]  C. Scown,et al.  Tree-based automated machine learning to predict biogas production for anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste , 2021, bioRxiv.

[7]  T. Kirchstetter,et al.  The implications of facility design and enabling policies on the economics of dry anaerobic digestion. , 2021, Waste management.

[8]  Analysis of MSW Landfill Tipping Fees — 2020 , 2021 .

[9]  Marija Mojicevic,et al.  Production of Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and Factors Impacting Its Chemical and Mechanical Characteristics , 2020, Polymers.

[10]  Nawa Raj Baral,et al.  Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  N. Brown,et al.  Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Human Health Tradeoffs of Organic Waste Management Strategies. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  T. Reina,et al.  Membrane-based technologies for biogas upgrading: a review , 2020, Environmental Chemistry Letters.

[13]  C. V. Rao,et al.  Recent developments in pretreatment technologies on lignocellulosic biomass: Effect of key parameters, technological improvements, and challenges. , 2020, Bioresource technology.

[14]  J. Wilcox,et al.  Getting to Neutral: Options for Negative Carbon Emissions in California , 2019 .

[15]  S. Mani,et al.  Economic and environmental impacts of an integrated-state anaerobic digestion system to produce compressed natural gas from organic wastes and energy crops , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[16]  J. Colón,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure and cheese whey (Cow, Goat & Sheep) at small to medium dairy farms. , 2019, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Nawa Raj Baral,et al.  Techno-economic analysis and life-cycle greenhouse gas mitigation cost of five routes to bio-jet fuel blendstocks , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[18]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Supply and value chain analysis of mixed biomass feedstock supply system for lignocellulosic sugar production , 2019, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining.

[19]  A. Coleman,et al.  Wet waste-to-energy resources in the United States , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[20]  A. Horvath,et al.  Drop-in biofuels offer strategies for meeting California’s 2030 climate mandate , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[21]  J. J. Walsh,et al.  Repeated application of anaerobic digestate, undigested cattle slurry and inorganic fertilizer N: Impacts on pasture yield and quality , 2018 .

[22]  J. Joshi,et al.  Manure management coupled with bioenergy production: An environmental and economic assessment of large dairies in New Mexico , 2018, Energy Economics.

[23]  W. Verstraete,et al.  Decoupling Livestock from Land Use through Industrial Feed Production Pathways. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  Eric C. D. Tan,et al.  Life‐cycle analysis of integrated biorefineries with co‐production of biofuels and bio‐based chemicals: co‐product handling methods and implications , 2018, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining.

[25]  Ajay V. Shah,et al.  Techno‐economic comparison of biogas cleaning for grid injection, compressed natural gas, and biogas‐to‐methanol conversion technologies , 2018 .

[26]  K. Mach,et al.  Near-term deployment of carbon capture and sequestration from biorefineries in the United States , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Gabriel E. Lade,et al.  Designing Climate Policy: Lessons from the Renewable Fuel Standard and the Blend Wall , 2018 .

[28]  B. Neto,et al.  Life cycle assessment of aquafeed ingredients , 2018, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  Andrew J Cal,et al.  Methane to bioproducts: the future of the bioeconomy? , 2017, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[30]  G. Najafpour,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of animal manures and lignocellulosic residues as a potent approach for sustainable biogas production , 2017 .

[31]  B. Simmons,et al.  Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas and Water Intensity of Cellulosic Biofuel Production Using Cholinium Lysinate Ionic Liquid Pretreatment , 2017 .

[32]  B. Simmons,et al.  Survey of Lignin-Structure Changes and Depolymerization during Ionic Liquid Pretreatment , 2017 .

[33]  N. Shah,et al.  Multi-product biorefineries from lignocelluloses: a pathway to revitalisation of the sugar industry? , 2017, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[34]  Alastair Robinson,et al.  Bioenergy Potential from Food Waste in California. , 2017, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  P. Lant,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) production from methane—The case for thermophilic bioprocessing , 2016 .

[36]  J. Maasakkers,et al.  Gridded National Inventory of U.S. Methane Emissions. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  2016 Billion-Ton Report: Advancing Domestic Resources for a Thriving Bioeconomy , 2016 .

[38]  M. A. Oke,et al.  Mixed Feedstock Approach to Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production—Prospects and Limitations , 2016, BioEnergy Research.

[39]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[40]  Erik Kuhn,et al.  DMR (deacetylation and mechanical refining) processing of corn stover achieves high monomeric sugar concentrations (230 g L−1) during enzymatic hydrolysis and high ethanol concentrations (>10% v/v) during fermentation without hydrolysate purification or concentration , 2016 .

[41]  Amy Schwab,et al.  Bioenergy Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan. March 2016 , 2016 .

[42]  Thomas A Trabold,et al.  Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Analysis of an Anaerobic Codigestion Facility Processing Dairy Manure and Industrial Food Waste. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Denis Rodrigue,et al.  Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading , 2015 .

[44]  Documentation for Greenhouse Gas Emission and Energy Factors Used in the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) , 2015 .

[45]  A. Steinbüchel,et al.  PHA recovery from biomass. , 2013, Biomacromolecules.

[46]  Elena Ficara,et al.  A comparison of different pre-treatments to increase methane production from two agricultural substrates , 2013 .

[47]  Craig S Criddle,et al.  Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment for a cradle-to-cradle cycle: biogas-to-bioplastic (and back). , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[48]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[49]  Ryan Davis,et al.  Process Design and Economics for Biochemical Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol: Dilute-Acid Pretreatment and Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Corn Stover , 2011 .

[50]  Jay P. Graham,et al.  Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: the need for sanitary reform. , 2010, Journal of water and health.

[51]  Bruce E Dale,et al.  Multifaceted characterization of cell wall decomposition products formed during ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid based pretreatments. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[52]  M. Øverland,et al.  Evaluation of methane-utilising bacteria products as feed ingredients for monogastric animals , 2010, Archives of animal nutrition.

[53]  M. Jechorek,et al.  Potassium deficiency results in accumulation of ultra‐high molecular weight poly‐β‐hydroxybutyrate in a methane‐utilizing mixed culture , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[54]  G. Mirschel,et al.  Process Design for the Microbial Synthesis of Poly‐β‐hydroxybutyrate (PHB) from Natural Gas , 2007 .

[55]  J. S. Pai,et al.  Production and recovery of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate from Methylobacterium sp V49 , 2002 .

[56]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Economic Input–Output Models for Environmental Life-Cycle Assessment , 1998 .