Joint Interpretation of Marine Self‐Potential and Transient Electromagnetic Survey for Seafloor Massive Sulfide (SMS) Deposits: Application at TAG Hydrothermal Mound, Mid‐Atlantic Ridge

The self‐potential (SP) method is expected to play an important role in the exploration of seafloor massive sulfide (SMS) resources. Since the redox potential changes with depth below the seafloor, SMS deposits are the source of an electrical (source) current density, generating in turn a recordable electrical field. This electrical field can be remotely measured at and above the seafloor. By integrating this electrical field, we obtained a so‐called SP profile or map. The electrical conductivity distribution of SMS deposits is an important ingredient in the inversion of these SP data in order to distinguish between causative primary sources (i.e., associated with the SMS deposits themselves) and secondary current sources associated with conductivity contrasts below the seafloor. Such ingredient is therefore necessary to properly localize SMS deposits and eliminating ghosts associated with high conductivity contrasts. The conductivity structure of the seafloor is however unknown in most SP surveys. This study presents the first joint interpretation of transient electromagnetic and SP surveys. The field data were acquired at the Trans‐Atlantic Geotraverse (TAG) hydrothermal mound. The conductivity structure of TAG mound was obtained by inverting transient electromagnetic data. This electrical conductivity distribution is then used to invert the SP data. The obtained (primary) source current distribution delineates the geometry of the SMS deposits. The deposits are located in the center of the mound as well as at its edges, in a way that is consistent with water column data. Combining the two geophysical methods improves our ability to better decipher the fine geometry of SMS deposits below the seafloor.

[1]  A. Revil,et al.  3D self-potential tomography of seafloor massive sulfide deposits using an autonomous underwater vehicle , 2022, GEOPHYSICS.

[2]  S. Petersen,et al.  Deep‐Sea Electric and Magnetic Surveys Over Active and Inactive Basalt‐Hosted Hydrothermal Sites of the TAG Segment (26°, MAR): An Optimal Combination for Seafloor Massive Sulfide Exploration , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[3]  S. Petersen,et al.  Magnetic and Gravity Surface Geometry Inverse Modeling of the TAG Active Mound , 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[4]  J. Shen,et al.  Self‐Potential Tomography of a Deep‐Sea Polymetallic Sulfide Deposit on Southwest Indian Ridge , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.

[5]  T. Hyakudome,et al.  Marine DC resistivity and self-potential survey in the hydrothermal deposit areas using multiple AUVs and ASV , 2020, Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences.

[6]  M. Hannington,et al.  Structural Control, Evolution, and Accumulation Rates of Massive Sulfides in the TAG Hydrothermal Field , 2020, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.

[7]  T. Kasaya,et al.  Internal Structure of a Seafloor Massive Sulfide Deposit by Electrical Resistivity Tomography, Okinawa Trough , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[8]  André Revil,et al.  Induced polarization response of porous media with metallic particles — Part 9: Influence of permafrost , 2019, Geophysics.

[9]  S. Petersen,et al.  Marine Mineral Exploration With Controlled Source Electromagnetics at the TAG Hydrothermal Field, 26°N Mid‐Atlantic Ridge , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[10]  U. Schwarz-Schampera,et al.  Mapping seafloor massive sulfides with the Golden Eye frequency-domain EM profiler , 2018, First Break.

[11]  B. Murton,et al.  Marine dipole–dipole controlled source electromagnetic and coincident-loop transient electromagnetic experiments to detect seafloor massive sulphides: effects of three-dimensional bathymetry , 2018, Geophysical Journal International.

[12]  T. Kasaya,et al.  Self-potential mapping using an autonomous underwater vehicle for the Sunrise deposit, Izu-Ogasawara arc, southern Japan , 2018, Earth, Planets and Space.

[13]  D. Fournier,et al.  Distribution of Vapor and Condensate in a Hydrothermal System: Insights From Self‐Potential Inversion at Mount Tongariro, New Zealand , 2018, Geophysical Research Letters.

[14]  S. Constable,et al.  Measuring marine self-potential using an autonomous underwater vehicle , 2018, Geophysical Journal International.

[15]  André Revil,et al.  The Self-Potential Method: Theory and Applications in Environmental Geosciences , 2018 .

[16]  A. Revil,et al.  Self-potential: A Non-intrusive Ground Water Flow Sensor , 2017 .

[17]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  Pixels and their neighbors: Finite volume , 2016 .

[18]  D. Mao,et al.  Induced polarization response of porous media with metallic particles — Part 3: A new approach to time-domain induced polarization tomography , 2016 .

[19]  D. Mao,et al.  Induced polarization response of porous media with metallic particles — Part 4: Detection of metallic and nonmetallic targets in time-domain-induced polarization tomography , 2016 .

[20]  André Revil,et al.  Specific storage and hydraulic conductivity tomography through the joint inversion of hydraulic heads and self-potential data , 2016 .

[21]  Lindsey J. Heagy,et al.  SimPEG: An open source framework for simulation and gradient based parameter estimation in geophysical applications , 2015, Comput. Geosci..

[22]  Eldad Haber,et al.  Computational Methods in Geophysical Electromagnetics , 2014, Mathematics in Industry.

[23]  André Revil,et al.  Thermoelectric self-potential and resistivity data localize the burning front of underground coal fires , 2013 .

[24]  M. Mooney,et al.  Self-potential signals generated by the corrosion of buried metallic objects with application to contaminant plumes , 2013 .

[25]  A. Christiansen,et al.  Processing and inversion of commercial helicopter time-domain electromagnetic data for environmental assessments and geologic and hydrologic mapping , 2013 .

[26]  W. Wilcock,et al.  Geophysical Constraints on the Subseafloor Environment Near Mid-Ocean Ridges , 2013 .

[27]  Esben Auken,et al.  Test-site calibration and validation of airborne and ground-based TEM systems , 2013 .

[28]  G. Wu,et al.  Transient ElectroMagnetic and Electric Self-Potential survey in the TAG hydrothermal field in MAR , 2012 .

[29]  Allan Haas,et al.  Pattern of shallow ground water flow at Mount Princeton Hot Springs, Colorado, using geoelectrical methods , 2010 .

[30]  Bernd Kulessa,et al.  Understanding biogeobatteries: Where geophysics meets microbiology , 2010 .

[31]  A. Revil,et al.  Importance of structural history in the summit area of Stromboli during the 2002–2003 eruptive crisis inferred from temperature, soil CO2, self-potential, and electrical resistivity tomography , 2009 .

[32]  E. Rizzo,et al.  Inner structure of La Fossa di Vulcano (Vulcano Island, southern Tyrrhenian Sea, Italy) revealed by high-resolution electric resistivity tomography coupled with self-potential, temperature, and CO2 diffuse degassing measurements , 2008 .

[33]  Burke J. Minsley,et al.  Three-dimensional source inversion of self-potential data , 2007 .

[34]  T. Ishido.  Electrokinetic mechanism for the “W”‐shaped self‐potential profile on volcanoes , 2004 .

[35]  Maurice A. Tivey,et al.  A near‐bottom magnetic survey of the Mid‐Atlantic Ridge axis at 26°N: Implications for the tectonic evolution of the TAG segment , 2003 .

[36]  K. Yasukawa,et al.  Numerical modeling of a hydrothermal system around Waita volcano, Kyushu, Japan, based on resistivity and self-potential survey results , 2003 .

[37]  A. Revil,et al.  Tomography of self‐potential anomalies of electrochemical nature , 2001 .

[38]  E. Haber,et al.  On optimization techniques for solving nonlinear inverse problems , 2000 .

[39]  S. Humphris,et al.  Strontium and oxygen isotopic constraints on fluid mixing, alteration and mineralization in the TAG hydrothermal deposit , 1998 .

[40]  Domenico Patella,et al.  Self‐potential global tomography including topographic effects , 1997 .

[41]  D. Patella.  Introduction to ground surface self‐potential tomography , 1997 .

[42]  S. Humphris,et al.  Structural asymmetry of the TAG Rift Valley: Evidence from a near‐bottom survey for episodic spreading , 1996 .

[43]  R. N. Edwards,et al.  A time domain electromagnetic survey of the TAG Hydrothermal Mound , 1996 .

[44]  C. V. Raman,et al.  Active and relict sea-floor hydrothermal mineralization at the TAG hydrothermal field, Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1993 .

[45]  Dianne P. O'Leary,et al.  The Use of the L-Curve in the Regularization of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems , 1993, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[46]  J. Karson,et al.  Block-tilting, transfer faults, and structural control of magmatic and hydrothermal processesin the TAG area, Mid-Atlantic Ridge 26°N , 1990 .

[47]  P. Rona,et al.  Black smokers, massive sulphides and vent biota at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge , 1986, Nature.

[48]  R. Corwin,et al.  The self-potential method in geothermal exploration , 1979 .

[49]  L. Heagy.  Electromagnetic methods for imaging subsurface injections , 2018 .

[50]  M. Hannington,et al.  Technology developments in the exploration and evaluation of deep-sea mineral resources , 2017 .

[51]  M. Hannington,et al.  Modern sea-floor massive sulfides and base metal resources: Toward an estimate of global sea-floor massive sulfide potential , 2010 .

[52]  C. Mendonça.  Forward and inverse self-potential modeling in mineral exploration , 2008 .

[53]  Douglas W. Oldenburg,et al.  INVERSION FOR APPLIED GEOPHYSICS: A TUTORIAL , 2003 .

[54]  John A. Howie,et al.  A Numerical Modelling Procedure For The Study Of The Streaming Potential Phenomenon In Embankment Dams , 2003 .

[55]  J. Watterson,et al.  Modelling of bed contours and cross-sections adjacent to planar normal faults , 1989 .

[56]  W. R. Sill,et al.  Self-potential modeling from primary flows , 1983 .

[57]  H. Morrison,et al.  Self-potential studies at the Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field , 1980 .

[58]  R. W. Fox,et al.  XXV. On the electro-magnetic properties of metalliferous veins in the mines of Cornwall , 1830, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.