Zooming in to see the bigger picture: Microfluidic and nanofabrication tools to study bacteria

Background Nanotechnology and bacteriology at first sight may seem like two disparate worlds, but a rapidly moving field of research has formed at the interface of these disciplines in the past decade. Bacteria experience spatial structure at many scales: Individual bacteria interact with nanoscale surface features, whereas bacterial communities are shaped by landscape structure down to the microscale. Nanofabrication and microfluidics are ideally suited to define and control the environment at those scales, allowing us to zoom in on the peculiarities of individual cells and to broaden our understanding of the processes that shape multi-species communities. Recently developed nanotools provide unprecedented control over the bacterial microenvironment and have been key to the discovery of new phenomena in bacteriology. Studying bacteria using nanofabrication and microfluidics. (A) Escherichia coli bacteria use their flagella to exploit submicrometer crevices for surface attachment [Reprinted with permission from (5) (reference list of full paper online)]. (B) Biofilm streamers form in a meandering flow channel (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, red; extracellular polymeric substances, green) [Reprinted with permission from (93)]. (C) E. coli undergo a shape transition when squeezing into a nanofabricated channel as shallow as half their width [Reprinted with permission from (26)]. Scale bars, (A) 2 µm; (B) 200 µm; and (C) 5 µm. Advances Nanofabrication and microfluidics have expanded our view on a myriad of bacterial phenomena. Microfluidics provides ways to study individual bacteria in dynamic and well-defined environments and has been used to address long-standing questions concerning bacterial aging and antibiotic persistence. Biological insights have been gained by exploring bacterial growth and movement in nanofabricated constrictions and revealed that bacteria can penetrate constrictions as narrow as only half their width. Furthermore, nanofabrication has been used to discriminate between competing hypotheses regarding the mechanisms that underlie intercellular electron transport. Confinement of single bacteria in tiny volumes has provided an individualistic perspective on collective phenotypes and demonstrated that density-dependent behaviors can even be exhibited by individuals. Bacteria growing in nanofabricated chambers adopt predefined shapes and have been used to study the geometry dependence of intracellular processes. Microfluidics and nanofabrication have been combined to create synthetic ecosystems in which the spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics of bacterial communities can be explored. Various approaches to mimic the intricate spatial structure of natural bacterial habitats now contribute to our understanding of competition and cooperation within bacterial populations. Microfluidic platforms have boosted research on unculturable environmental species by eliminating the need for pre-analysis culturing. On-chip whole-genome amplification of environmental isolates has recently provided a first genotypic glimpse on this “dark matter of biology.” Outlook Looking ahead, it is clear that the doors that nanofabrication and microfluidics have opened will continue to make important contributions to basic bacteriology research. A comprehensive investigation of the uncultured majority with microfluidic technologies, for instance, may uncover the vast potential of currently unknown species. Practical applications such as microbial fuel cells or antibacterial surfaces will benefit from the understanding of bacterial behavior at the nanoscale. Microfluidic devices are now beginning to be commonly used in microbiology labs because of a demand for precise measurements in complex environments that can be controlled at the microscale. This trend will undoubtedly continue as scientists delve deeper into the complex lives of bacteria. Experimental platforms for probing bacteria Bacteria respond to a host of changing cues provided by their environment. Hol and Dekker review how microfluidic and nanofabricated devices can provide a platform to deliver different stimuli in a variety of environments. Bacterial quorum sensing and electron transport are among the problems that can be studied in this way. Science, this issue 10.1126/science.1251821 The spatial structure of natural habitats strongly affects bacterial life, ranging from nanoscale structural features that individual cells exploit for surface attachment, to micro- and millimeter-scale chemical gradients that drive population-level processes. Nanofabrication and microfluidics are ideally suited to manipulate the environment at those scales and have emerged as powerful tools with which to study bacteria. Here, we review the new scientific insights gained by using a diverse set of nanofabrication and microfluidic techniques to study individual bacteria and multispecies communities. This toolbox is beginning to elucidate disparate bacterial phenomena—including aging, electron transport, and quorum sensing—and enables the dissection of environmental communities through single-cell genomics. A more intimate integration of microfluidics, nanofabrication, and microbiology will enable further exploration of bacterial life at the smallest scales.

[1]  Felix J. H. Hol,et al.  Nutrient-responsive regulation determines biodiversity in a colicin-mediated bacterial community , 2014, BMC Biology.

[2]  Felix J. H. Hol,et al.  Nanoscale probing the kinetics of oriented bacterial cell growth using atomic force microscopy. , 2014, Small.

[3]  X. Raynaud,et al.  Spatial Ecology of Bacteria at the Microscale in Soil , 2014, PloS one.

[4]  Friedrich C Simmel,et al.  Communication and computation by bacteria compartmentalized within microemulsion droplets. , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  Y. Caspi Deformation of Filamentous Escherichia coli Cells in a Microfluidic Device: A New Technique to Study Cell Mechanics , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  H. Stone,et al.  Solutions to the Public Goods Dilemma in Bacterial Biofilms , 2013, Current Biology.

[7]  David R. Nelson,et al.  Bending forces plastically deform growing bacterial cell walls , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Felix J. H. Hol,et al.  The effects of chemical interactions and culture history on the colonization of structured habitats by competing bacterial populations , 2014, BMC Microbiology.

[9]  K. Ramamurthi,et al.  Studying Biomolecule Localization by Engineering Bacterial Cell Wall Curvature , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Thomas M. Norman,et al.  Memory and Modularity in Cell-Fate Decision Making , 2013, Nature.

[11]  Xiaocheng Jiang,et al.  Probing single- to multi-cell level charge transport in Geobacter sulfurreducens DL-1 , 2013, Nature Communications.

[12]  G. Kowalchuk,et al.  Micro-scale determinants of bacterial diversity in soil. , 2013, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[13]  Felix J. H. Hol,et al.  Spatial Structure Facilitates Cooperation in a Social Dilemma: Empirical Evidence from a Bacterial Community , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  R. Di Leonardo,et al.  Targeted delivery of colloids by swimming bacteria , 2013, Nature Communications.

[15]  J. Shear,et al.  3D printing of microscopic bacterial communities , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  T. Mora,et al.  Cell–cell contacts confine public goods diffusion inside Pseudomonas aeruginosa clonal microcolonies , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Ilsoo Kim,et al.  Bacterial recognition of silicon nanowire arrays. , 2013, Nano letters.

[18]  Shankar Mukherji,et al.  Robust Circadian Oscillations in Growing Cyanobacteria Require Transcriptional Feedback , 2013, Science.

[19]  Elena P Ivanova,et al.  Antibacterial surfaces: the quest for a new generation of biomaterials. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[20]  M. Parsek,et al.  Going local: technologies for exploring bacterial microenvironments , 2013, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[21]  Nynke H Dekker,et al.  Electron beam fabrication of a microfluidic device for studying submicron-scale bacteria , 2013, Journal of Nanobiotechnology.

[22]  Ronn S. Friedlander,et al.  Bacterial flagella explore microscale hummocks and hollows to increase adhesion , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  H. Stone,et al.  Biofilm streamers cause catastrophic disruption of flow with consequences for environmental and medical systems , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Kevin D Dorfman,et al.  Microfluidic chemostat for measuring single cell dynamics in bacteria. , 2013, Lab on a chip.

[25]  P. Blainey The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea. , 2013, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[26]  Stanislas Leibler,et al.  Dynamic Persistence of Antibiotic-Stressed Mycobacteria , 2013, Science.

[27]  G. Deutscher Superconductivity: The imaginary is real. , 2013, Nature nanotechnology.

[28]  A. Gardner,et al.  Quorum Sensing and the Confusion about Diffusion , 2022 .

[29]  F. Besenbacher,et al.  Filamentous bacteria transport electrons over centimetre distances , 2012, Nature.

[30]  R. Stocker Marine Microbes See a Sea of Gradients , 2012, Science.

[31]  Korneel Rabaey,et al.  Conversion of Wastes into Bioelectricity and Chemicals by Using Microbial Electrochemical Technologies , 2012, Science.

[32]  Derek R Lovley,et al.  Microbial nanowires: a new paradigm for biological electron transfer and bioelectronics. , 2012, ChemSusChem.

[33]  E. Stewart Growing Unculturable Bacteria , 2012, Journal of bacteriology.

[34]  D. Ingber,et al.  Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[35]  Niels W. Hanson,et al.  A programmable droplet-based microfluidic device applied to multiparameter analysis of single microbes and microbial communities , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  P. Cluzel,et al.  The single-cell chemostat: an agarose-based, microfluidic device for high-throughput, single-cell studies of bacteria and bacterial communities. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[37]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Robustness and accuracy of cell division in Escherichia coli in diverse cell shapes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Feng Wang,et al.  Differential attraction and repulsion of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on molecularly smooth titanium films , 2011, Scientific reports.

[39]  Vimal Sharma,et al.  Quantitative Characterization of the Influence of the Nanoscale Morphology of Nanostructured Surfaces on Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation , 2011, PloS one.

[40]  Chih-kuan Tung,et al.  Acceleration of Emergence of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance in Connected Microenvironments , 2011, Science.

[41]  B. Perthame,et al.  Directional persistence of chemotactic bacteria in a traveling concentration wave , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Noha H. Youssef,et al.  Partial Genome Assembly for a Candidate Division OP11 Single Cell from an Anoxic Spring (Zodletone Spring, Oklahoma) , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[43]  Byoung-Chan Kim,et al.  Tunable metallic-like conductivity in microbial nanowire networks. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[44]  P. Dorrestein,et al.  Imaging mass spectrometry in microbiology , 2011, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[45]  Rob Phillips,et al.  Probing Individual Environmental Bacteria for Viruses by Using Microfluidic Digital PCR , 2011, Science.

[46]  D. Weibel,et al.  Physicochemical regulation of biofilm formation , 2011, MRS bulletin.

[47]  D. Weibel,et al.  Cardiolipin microdomains localize to negatively curved regions of Escherichia coli membranes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  D. Weibel,et al.  Quorum sensing between Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms accelerates cell growth. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  Laura Guglielmini,et al.  Secondary flow as a mechanism for the formation of biofilm streamers. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[50]  Paul C. Blainey,et al.  Genome of a Low-Salinity Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaeon Determined by Single-Cell and Metagenomic Analysis , 2011, PloS one.

[51]  Elena P Ivanova,et al.  Bacterial retention on superhydrophobic titanium surfaces fabricated by femtosecond laser ablation. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[52]  R. Di Leonardo,et al.  Swimming with an image. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[53]  J. Shear,et al.  Sociomicrobiology in engineered landscapes. , 2011, Nature chemical biology.

[54]  Ashley G. Smart Two experiments, two takes on electric bacteria , 2010 .

[55]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Microfluidics for bacterial chemotaxis. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[56]  A. Ellington,et al.  Probing Prokaryotic Social Behaviors with Bacterial “Lobster Traps” , 2010, mBio.

[57]  T. D. Yuzvinsky,et al.  Electrical transport along bacterial nanowires from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Xiaocheng Jiang,et al.  Probing electron transfer mechanisms in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 using a nanoelectrode platform and single-cell imaging , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Bacterial chemotaxis in linear and nonlinear steady microfluidic gradients. , 2010, Nano letters.

[60]  Laura Guglielmini,et al.  Laminar flow around corners triggers the formation of biofilm streamers , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[61]  Joanna Aizenberg,et al.  Bacteria pattern spontaneously on periodic nanostructure arrays. , 2010, Nano letters.

[62]  Andrew Wright,et al.  Robust Growth of Escherichia coli , 2010, Current Biology.

[63]  A. Bélanger,et al.  Use of Ichip for High-Throughput In Situ Cultivation of “Uncultivable” Microbial Species , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[64]  L. Tsimring,et al.  A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks , 2009, Nature.

[65]  R Di Leonardo,et al.  Bacterial ratchet motors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  C Jeffrey Brinker,et al.  Confinement-induced quorum sensing of individual Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. , 2010, Nature chemical biology.

[67]  I. Aranson,et al.  Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Bacterial growth and motility in sub-micron constrictions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  R. Ismagilov,et al.  Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[70]  R. Austin,et al.  Computation of mutual fitness by competing bacteria , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  Marcos,et al.  Resource Patch Formation and Exploitation throughout the Marine Microbial Food Web , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[72]  J. Choi,et al.  Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[73]  R. Austin,et al.  Funnel ratchets in biology at low Reynolds number: choanotaxis , 2008 .

[74]  George M Whitesides,et al.  Using ratchets and sorters to fractionate motile cells of Escherichia coli by length. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[75]  Eric Lauga,et al.  Hydrodynamic attraction of swimming microorganisms by surfaces. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[76]  Nathalie Q Balaban,et al.  Single-cell protein induction dynamics reveals a period of vulnerability to antibiotics in persister bacteria , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[77]  Roman Stocker,et al.  Rapid chemotactic response enables marine bacteria to exploit ephemeral microscale nutrient patches , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[78]  François Taddei,et al.  Asymmetric segregation of protein aggregates is associated with cellular aging and rejuvenation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  Robert Austin,et al.  A Wall of Funnels Concentrates Swimming Bacteria , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[80]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  Nanoliter Reactors Improve Multiple Displacement Amplification of Genomes from Single Cells , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[81]  S. Quake,et al.  Dissecting biological “dark matter” with single-cell genetic analysis of rare and uncultivated TM7 microbes from the human mouth , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[82]  Burkhard A. Hense,et al.  Does efficiency sensing unify diffusion and quorum sensing? , 2007, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[83]  Stephen R. Quake,et al.  Microfluidic Digital PCR Enables Multigene Analysis of Individual Environmental Bacteria , 2006, Science.

[84]  R. Austin,et al.  Bacterial metapopulations in nanofabricated landscapes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[85]  D. Lovley Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[86]  Yuichi Hiratsuka,et al.  A microrotary motor powered by bacteria , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[87]  D. Relman,et al.  Assembly of the human intestinal microbiota. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[88]  K. Young The Selective Value of Bacterial Shape , 2006, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[89]  Alice Dohnalkova,et al.  Electrically conductive bacterial nanowires produced by Shewanella oneidensis strain MR-1 and other microorganisms. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[90]  Eric C. Carnes,et al.  Cell-Directed Assembly of Lipid-Silica Nanostructures Providing Extended Cell Viability , 2006, Science.

[91]  Derek R. Lovley,et al.  Bug juice: harvesting electricity with microorganisms , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[92]  Bonnie L. Bassler,et al.  Bacterially Speaking , 2006, Cell.

[93]  Alex Groisman,et al.  A microfluidic chemostat for experiments with bacterial and yeast cells , 2005, Nature Methods.

[94]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Microoxen: microorganisms to move microscale loads. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Controlling the shape of filamentous cells of Escherichia coli. , 2005, Nano letters.

[96]  Piotr Garstecki,et al.  Escherichia coli swim on the right-hand side , 2005, Nature.

[97]  T. Mehta,et al.  Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires , 2005, Nature.

[98]  Joanna Verran,et al.  Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions. , 2005, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[99]  François Taddei,et al.  Aging and Death in an Organism That Reproduces by Morphologically Symmetric Division , 2005, PLoS Biology.

[100]  S. Leibler,et al.  Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch , 2004, Science.

[101]  S. Giovannoni,et al.  The uncultured microbial majority. , 2003, Annual review of microbiology.

[102]  N. Darnton,et al.  Influence of topology on bacterial social interaction , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[103]  R. Austin,et al.  Motion to Form a Quorum , 2003, Science.

[104]  Martin Ackermann,et al.  Senescence in a Bacterium with Asymmetric Division , 2003, Science.

[105]  H. Mao,et al.  A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  K. Zengler,et al.  Cultivating the uncultured , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[107]  R. Redfield Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? , 2002, Trends in microbiology.

[108]  Michael Wagner,et al.  Reversible and Irreversible Adhesion of Motile Escherichia coli Cells Analyzed by Total Internal Reflection Aqueous Fluorescence Microscopy , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[109]  K. Lewis,et al.  Isolating "Uncultivable" Microorganisms in Pure Culture in a Simulated Natural Environment , 2002, Science.

[110]  D. R. Bond,et al.  Electrode-Reducing Microorganisms That Harvest Energy from Marine Sediments , 2002, Science.

[111]  Yunfeng Lu,et al.  Aerosol-assisted self-assembly of mesostructured spherical nanoparticles , 1999, Nature.

[112]  R. Kolter,et al.  Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[113]  J. Bigger TREATMENT OF STAPHYLOCOCCAL INFECTIONS WITH PENICILLIN BY INTERMITTENT STERILISATION , 1944 .