Student-Centred Teaching Methods: Can They Optimise Students' Approaches to Learning in Professional Higher Education?.

Abstract This paper investigates dynamics in approaches to learning within different learning environments. Two quasi-experimental studies were conducted with first-year student teachers (NStudy 1 = 496, NStudy 2 = 1098) studying a child development course. Data collection was carried out using a pre-test/post-test design by means of the Approaches to Learning and Studying Inventory. Study 1 compared a lecture-based learning environment with a student-centred learning environment. Results were opposite to the premise that student-centred instruction deepened student learning. Instead, the latter pushed students towards a surface approach. Study 2 investigated whether mixed learning environments consisting of lectures and case-based learning could enhance students’ approaches to learning, compared to learning environments in which either lectures or case-based learning were used. Results showed that the deep and strategic approach decreased in the lecture-based, the case-based and the alternated learning environment, in which lectures and case-based learning were used by turns, while they remained the same in the gradually implemented case-based learning environment. With respect to the surface approach, the strongest decrease was found in the latter learning environment. In conclusion, this paper shows the added value of gradually implementing case-based learning. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to enhance the deep approach, monitoring studying, organised studying and effort management.

[1]  P. Petegem,et al.  Alternative data-analysis techniques in research on student learning: illustrations of a person-oriented and developmental perspectives , 2009 .

[2]  Sarah Gielen,et al.  Evaluating the Consequential Validity of New Modes of Assessment: The Influence of Assessment on Learning, Including Pre-, Post-, and True Assessment Effects , 2003 .

[3]  F. Marton,et al.  Approaches to learning , 2003 .

[4]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective , 2000 .

[5]  Sofie M. M. Loyens,et al.  INSTRUCTION BASED ON INQUIRY , 2010 .

[6]  S. Lea,et al.  Higher Education Students' Attitudes to Student-centred Learning: Beyond 'educational bulimia'? , 2003 .

[7]  P. Tynjälä.  Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university , 1999 .

[8]  Keithia Wilson *,et al.  Assessing the impact of learning environments on students' approaches to learning: comparing conventional and action learning designs , 2005 .

[9]  F. Marton,et al.  The Experience of Learning , 1984 .

[10]  J. Biggs,et al.  The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. , 2001, The British journal of educational psychology.

[11]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[12]  R. Mayer.  Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[13]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[14]  F. Dochy,et al.  Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness , 2010 .

[15]  K. Trigwell,et al.  Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning , 1999 .

[16]  Ference Marton,et al.  On non‐verbatim learning: II. The erosion effect of a task‐induced learning algorithm , 1976 .

[17]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments , 1990 .

[18]  Sofie M. M. Loyens,et al.  The impact of students' conceptions of constructivist assumptions on academic achievement and drop‐out , 2007 .

[19]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[20]  L. Cohen,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 1980 .

[21]  Velda McCune,et al.  The Conceptual Bases of Study Strategy Inventories , 2004 .

[22]  Filip Dochy,et al.  Students’ likes and dislikes regarding student-activating and lecture-based educational settings: Consequences for students’ perceptions of the learning environment, student learning and performance , 2008 .

[23]  A. Renkl.  Why constructivists should not talk about constructivist learning environments: a commentary on Loyens and Gijbels (2008) , 2009 .

[24]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  Towards more powerful learning environments through combining the perspectives of designers, teachers, and students. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[25]  F. Dochy,et al.  Enhancing students’ approaches to learning: the added value of gradually implementing case-based learning , 2013 .

[26]  Mien Segers,et al.  Constructivist learning environments and the (im)possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning , 2008 .

[27]  K. Scouller.  The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay , 1998 .

[28]  Sarah Gielen,et al.  On the dynamics of students' approaches to learning: The effects of the teaching/learning environment , 2006 .

[29]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[30]  Filip Dochy,et al.  ‘Teach as you preach’: the effects of student‐centred versus lecture‐based teaching on student teachers’ approaches to teaching , 2010 .

[31]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Student-centred and teacher-centred learning environments: what students think , 2007 .

[32]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[33]  Andreas Holzinger,et al.  Student-Centered Teaching Meets New Media: Concept and Case Study , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[34]  Towards an equilibrium model for creating powerful learning environments. Validation of a questionnaire on creating powerful learning environments during teacher training internships , 2006 .

[35]  F. Marton,et al.  ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING—II OUTCOME AS A FUNCTION OF THE LEARNER'S CONCEPTION OF THE TASK , 1976 .

[36]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  John Biggs,et al.  Enhancing Learning: A Matter of Style or Approach? , 2014 .

[38]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Student-Centered Learning and Interactive Multimedia: Status, Issues, and Implications , 1997 .