Content Overlap and Replacement Cost Analyses: Tools to Evaluate Abstracting/Indexing (A&I) and Full-Text Databases in Science and Engineering
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] William H. Walters,et al. Comparative Recall and Precision of Simple and Expert Searches in Google Scholar and Eight Other Databases , 2011 .
[2] Zac Rolnik. Big Deal = Good Deal? , 2009 .
[3] Carmelita Pickett. Eliminating Administrative Churn: The “Big Deal” and Database Subscriptions , 2011 .
[4] 李建秀. 美国工程信息公司(Engineering Information)对中国的影响 , 2006 .
[5] Thomas W. Conkling,et al. Google Scholar’s Coverage of the Engineering Literature: An Empirical Study , 2008 .
[6] Elizabeth R Lorbeer,et al. Building Relevant and Sustainable Collections , 2009 .
[7] Jie Li,et al. Citation Analysis: Comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar , 2010 .
[8] Hal Kirkwood,et al. Researching the Life Sciences: BIOSIS Previews and Google scholar , 2011 .
[9] Carol Perruso. Research Guides: University Library Collections Budget Planning: Overview , 2012 .
[10] Theodore C. Bergstrom. Librarians and the terrible fix: economics of the big deal , 2010 .
[11] Jay Bhatt,et al. JISC's Academic Database Assessment Tool as a Collection Development and Management Tool for Bibliographic Databases , 2009 .
[12] Christy Caldwell,et al. Shifting Sands: Science Researchers on Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed, with Implications for Library Collections Budgets. , 2010 .
[13] Liam Earney. An introduction to the JISC Academic Database Assessment Tool , 2009 .
[14] S. Goerner. AN INTRODUCTION , 1959, Oryx.
[15] Joseph R. Kraus,et al. Finding Chemistry Information UsingGoogle Scholar: A Comparison withChemical Abstracts Service , 2007 .