A New Technique for Safe Pesticide Spraying in Greenhouses

Protection from parasites is an important factor in agricultural operations, and calls for continual monitoring and prompt action when needed. In many cases, the equipment, pesticides and manpower required for this purpose account for the majority of production expenses. Though the use of chemicals has had a major influence on the development of agriculture in the twentieth century, bringing significant benefits, it has also had many side effects on human health, animals and the environment. The ease with which these substances can be used, their initial low cost and the lack of knowledge on the part of growers has led to an overuse of pesticides, with dangerous consequences. Only in the last few years have agricultural techniques brought about improvements in the pesticides used (Hewitt, 2000). There can be no doubt that advances in this field have provided a more effective range of choices, for growers and the environment in particular. Parasites must thus be combated by producing a climate that is unfavourable for them, as well as by using a forceful, accurate and incisive spray technique. To reduce pesticides by using more effective treatments, recent studies have investigated different spray techniques capable of reducing the pesticide dose with very low waste and outflow (Austerweil & Grinstein, 1997). Efficacy of crop spraying depends on two main factors: coverage density and uniformity, and droplet size. For the first factor, it should be emphasised that droplets should reach leaves without any overlapping. The second factor is important because many studies have shown that coarse droplets reduce spraying treatment efficacy. In fact, smaller droplets penetrate the canopy better and, transported by air, can reach each part of the crop without dispersion. This is especially true in the greenhouse, where wind is not a problem. These considerations have spurred interest in the idea of spraying pesticides in a defined volume, i.e., a confined area (Molto et al, 2001) (Ebert et al, 2003). The first step in designing an innovative pesticide sprayer is to study various spraying techniques.

[1]  F. Solanelles,et al.  PM—Power and Machinery: Assessment of Recycling Tunnel Sprayers in Mediterranean Vineyards and Apple Orchards , 2002 .

[2]  Gustavo Belforte,et al.  Horticultural Robotics: seven years of experimentation , 2008 .

[3]  Tomonari Furukawa,et al.  Autonomous Pesticide Spraying Robot for use in a Greenhouse , 2005 .

[4]  Terenziano Raparelli,et al.  “DeVoPeS”: Defined volume pesticide sprayer design and testing , 2011 .

[5]  Man Singh,et al.  Survismeter--type I and II for surface tension, viscosity measurements of liquids for academic, and research and development studies. , 2006, Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods.

[6]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Effect of nozzle type, size and pressure on spray droplet characteristics , 2007 .

[7]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Effects of the Biomolecules: Vitamins, Proteins, Amino Acids, and Surfactants: DTAB, MTOAC, TMSOI, Orcinol on Upper Critical Solution Temperatures , 2007 .

[8]  B Sonck,et al.  Comparison of operator exposure for five different greenhouse spraying applications. , 2004, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[9]  Aníbal Ollero,et al.  The autonomous mobile robot AURORA for greenhouse operation , 1996, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[10]  A. Hewitt,et al.  Spray drift: impact of requirements to protect the environment. , 2000 .

[11]  Bernard Panneton,et al.  Spray chamber evaluation of air-assisted spraying on potato plants. , 2000 .

[12]  Frédéric Lebeau,et al.  Modelling the Dynamic Distribution of Spray Deposits , 2004 .

[13]  John F. Reid,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PRECISION SPRAYER FOR SITE-SPECIFIC WEED MANAGEMENT , 1999 .

[14]  D. Nuyttens,et al.  Droplet Size and Velocity Characteristics of Agricultural Sprays , 2009 .

[15]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Potential dermal pesticide exposure affected by greenhouse spray application technique. , 2009, Pest management science.

[16]  A. Escolà,et al.  An Electronic Control System for Pesticide Application Proportional to the Canopy Width of Tree Crops , 2006 .

[17]  Terenziano Raparelli,et al.  Testing the performance of oil fog lubricators , 1986 .

[18]  Gustavo Belforte,et al.  Robots for greenhouses: challenges and opportunities. , 2007 .

[19]  R. C. Derksen,et al.  Volume, Speed, and Distribution Technique Effects on Poinsettia Foliar Deposits , 1996 .

[20]  Graham Matthews,et al.  Pesticide application methods , 1979 .

[21]  Enrique Moltó,et al.  PM—Power and Machinery , 2000 .

[22]  Man Singh Upper critical solution temperatures for immiscible solvent systems with halide salts, carboxylic acids, surfactants and polynuclear aromatic compounds and benzene derivatives , 2007 .

[23]  Gustavo Belforte,et al.  Robot Design and Testing for Greenhouse Applications , 2006 .

[24]  B Sonck,et al.  Optimisation of sequence and orientation for used nozzles based on few, full boom distribution measurements. , 2005, Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences.

[25]  Maurice Millet,et al.  Comparison of different sampling techniques for the evaluation of pesticide spray drift in apple orchards. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  L. F. Bouse Effect of Nozzle Type and Operation on Spray Droplet Size , 1994 .

[27]  Terenziano Raparelli,et al.  Analysis of pneumatic techniques for pesticide spraying in greenhouses , 2009 .

[28]  Zetian Fu,et al.  Experimental study of droplet transport time between nozzles and target , 2006 .

[29]  H. Paul A. Illing,et al.  The Management of Pesticide Exposure in Greenhouses , 1997 .

[30]  John S. Shrimpton,et al.  A digital image analysis technique for quantitative characterisation of high-speed sprays , 2007 .

[31]  B Sonck,et al.  Optimisation of a vertical spray boom for greenhouse spraying applications. , 2003, Communications in agricultural and applied biological sciences.

[32]  David Nuyttens,et al.  Influence of Spray Application Technique on Spray Deposition in Greenhouse Ivy Pot Plants Grown on Hanging Shelves , 2009 .

[33]  P.C.H. Miller,et al.  An Experimental Sprayer for the Spatially Selective Application of Herbicides , 1995 .

[34]  Richard A. Fenske,et al.  Pesticide Exposure During Greenhouse Applications. III. Variable Exposure Due to Ventilation Conditions and Spray Pressure , 1996 .

[35]  Mitsuji Monta,et al.  Basic constitution of a robot for agricultural use , 1995, Adv. Robotics.

[36]  Paulo Estevão Cruvinel,et al.  An Automatic Method Based on Image Processing for Measurements of Drop Size Distribution from Agricultural Sprinklers , 1996 .

[37]  Charles R Krause,et al.  Comparing greenhouse sprayers: the dose-transfer process. , 2004, Pest management science.

[38]  Won Suk Lee,et al.  Autonomous robotic vehicle development for greenhouse spraying , 2005 .

[39]  A. Grinstein,et al.  Automatic pesticide application in greenhouses , 1997, Phytoparasitica.

[40]  C. Sinfort,et al.  Emission of pesticides to the air during sprayer application: A bibliographic review , 2005 .