Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior

Users of social networking services can connect with each other by forming communities for online interaction. Yet as the number of communities hosted by such websites grows over time, users have even greater need for effective community recommendations in order to meet more users. In this paper, we investigate two algorithms from very different domains and evaluate their effectiveness for personalized community recommendation. First is association rule mining (ARM), which discovers associations between sets of communities that are shared across many users. Second is latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), which models user-community co-occurrences using latent aspects. In comparing LDA with ARM, we are interested in discovering whether modeling low-rank latent structure is more effective for recommendations than directly mining rules from the observed data. We experiment on an Orkut data set consisting of 492,104 users and 118,002 communities. Our empirical comparisons using the top-k recommendations metric show that LDA performs consistently better than ARM for the community recommendation task when recommending a list of 4 or more communities. However, for recommendation lists of up to 3 communities, ARM is still a bit better. We analyze examples of the latent information learned by LDA to explain this finding. To efficiently handle the large-scale data set, we parallelize LDA on distributed computers and demonstrate our parallel implementation's scalability with varying numbers of machines.

[1]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Probabilistic author-topic models for information discovery , 2004, KDD.

[2]  Bamshad Mobasher,et al.  Robustness of collaborative recommendation based on association rule mining , 2007, RecSys '07.

[3]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules in Large Databases , 1994, VLDB.

[4]  Tomasz Imielinski,et al.  Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases , 1993, SIGMOD Conference.

[5]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Modeling annotated data , 2003, SIGIR.

[6]  Mehran Sahami,et al.  Evaluating similarity measures: a large-scale study in the orkut social network , 2005, KDD '05.

[7]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[8]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[9]  Rajeev Thakur,et al.  Optimization of Collective Communication Operations in MPICH , 2005, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[10]  Mark Steyvers,et al.  Finding scientific topics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  The Author-Recipient-Topic Model for Topic and Role Discovery in Social Networks: Experiments with Enron and Academic Email , 2005 .

[12]  Choochart Haruechaiyasak,et al.  Collaborative Filtering by Mining Association Rules from User Access Sequences , 2005, International Workshop on Challenges in Web Information Retrieval and Integration.

[13]  Robert B. Ross,et al.  Using MPI-2: Advanced Features of the Message Passing Interface , 2003, CLUSTER.

[14]  Ramakrishnan Srikant,et al.  Mining generalized association rules , 1995, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[15]  Jian Pei,et al.  Mining Frequent Patterns without Candidate Generation: A Frequent-Pattern Tree Approach , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining - Workshops (ICDMW'06).

[16]  Sanjay Ghemawat,et al.  MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters , 2004, OSDI.

[17]  Yehuda Koren,et al.  Factorization meets the neighborhood: a multifaceted collaborative filtering model , 2008, KDD.

[18]  Edward Y. Chang,et al.  Pfp: parallel fp-growth for query recommendation , 2008, RecSys '08.