The effect of waiting time on pain intensity after elective surgical lumbar discectomy.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Waitlists are commonly used in Canada to manage access to surgical procedures such as elective surgical lumbar discectomy (ESLD). The timing of enrollment onto the waitlist is important as this is a proxy measure for the concordance of preferences for surgery between a patient and surgeon. After enrollment, the waiting time to actual surgery extends the duration of preoperative symptoms, which possibly affects the outcome of ESLD. Waiting time also specifically reflects the delay in service delivery imposed by the limited capacity of the health-care system. PURPOSE To determine if a system-imposed delay in treatment, that is, longer waiting time, for ESLD is associated with a higher odds of experiencing residual postoperative pain. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Ambidirectional cohort study with 2-year retrospective and 3-year prospective components, conducted at a major tertiary care center serving a metropolitan area in Canada. PATIENT SAMPLE Patients aged 16 years or older with sciatica because of herniated lumbar disc, confirmed on advanced imaging, were recruited at the time of waitlist enrollment for ESLD. Patients with significant comorbidity or emergency indications for surgery were excluded. Of 391 participants, 291 had complete follow-up information at 6 months postoperatively. OUTCOME MEASURE Intensity of the predominant symptom (worse of either back or leg pain) was assessed on the 11-point numerical rating scale at waitlist enrollment and 6 months postoperatively. Pain scores were highly skewed and therefore categorized into four ordinal levels defined by quartiles. METHODS For the primary analysis, time to surgery from waitlist enrollment was dichotomized based on a predetermined clinically meaningful cut-point of 12 weeks. Ordinal logistic regression was used to compare the odds of experiencing higher pain intensity between wait groups. Control of confounders was achieved using both propensity scores and conventional multivariable modeling. RESULTS In unadjusted analyses, long-wait patients were 80% more likely than short-wait patients to experience higher ordinal pain intensity at 6 months; unadjusted proportional odds ratio (POR)=1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.8). The association held after controlling for all imbalances in measured confounders, with long-wait patients still being 70% more likely to report worse pain; adjusted POR=1.7 (95% CI, 1.0-2.8). CONCLUSIONS A waiting time of 12 weeks or more after waitlist enrollment for ESLD is associated with a modest likelihood of experiencing worse pain at 6 months postoperatively. This result was not because of differences in measured confounders. Future studies are encouraged to identify other, as-of-yet unmeasured, variables that might be associated with both longer waiting times and worse outcomes among ESLD patients. Until then, in jurisdictions where highly constrained access to ESLD is managed through waitlists, the expected waiting time for the operation could be an informative deciding criterion for patients with otherwise unresolved preferences for operative treatment.

[1]  Elisabeth Svensson,et al.  Comparison of the Quality of Assessments Using Continuous and Discrete Ordinal Rating Scales , 2000 .

[2]  A. Brawanski,et al.  Variability of outcome after lumbar disc surgery. , 1999, Spine.

[3]  Bacchus Barua,et al.  Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2012 Report , 2010 .

[4]  C. Fisher,et al.  Outcome Evaluation of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Disc Protrusion Causing Radiculopathy , 2007, Spine.

[5]  B. Romner,et al.  Duration of symptoms as a predictor of outcome after lumbar disc surgery , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[6]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Model‐Building Strategies and Methods for Logistic Regression , 2005 .

[7]  R. Deyo,et al.  The Quebec Task Force Classification for Spinal Disorders and the Severity, Treatment, and Outcomes of Sciatica and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1996, Spine.

[8]  T. Solberg,et al.  Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up. , 2000, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  Ronald Brand,et al.  Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica from lumbar disc herniation: cost utility analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  H. Quan,et al.  Health service costs for patients on the waiting list. , 2002, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[11]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[12]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[13]  R. Keller,et al.  Long-Term Disability and Return to Work Among Patients Who Have a Herniated Lumbar Disc: The Effect of Disability Compensation* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Duration of symptoms resulting from lumbar disc herniation: effect on treatment outcomes: analysis of the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  William R Shadish,et al.  Propensity Scores , 2005, Evaluation review.

[16]  J. Hagenaars,et al.  The Multiple Propensity Score as Control for Bias in the Comparison of More Than Two Treatment Arms: An Introduction From a Case Study in Mental Health , 2010, Medical care.

[17]  R. Deyo,et al.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part I: Background and Concepts , 1996, Spine.

[18]  M L Barer,et al.  Waiting for medical services in Canada: lots of heat, but little light. , 2000, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[19]  B. Koes,et al.  Timing of surgery for sciatica: subgroup analysis alongside a randomized trial , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[20]  C. Fisher,et al.  Outcome evaluation of the operative management of lumbar disc herniation causing sciatica. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  W. Winkelmayer,et al.  Propensity scores in the presence of effect modification: A case study using the comparison of mortality on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis , 2010, Emerging themes in epidemiology.

[22]  R. Deyo,et al.  The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part II: 1‐Year Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Sciatica , 1996, Spine.

[23]  P. Rosenbaum Covariance Adjustment in Randomized Experiments and Observational Studies , 2002 .

[24]  J. Stockman Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): A Randomized Trial , 2008 .

[25]  D. Feeny,et al.  Health-related quality of life and mobility of patients awaiting elective total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study. , 2002, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[26]  P. Benum,et al.  Incapacity for work in elective orthopaedic surgery: a study of occurrence and the probability of returning to work after treatment. , 1993, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[27]  B. Masri,et al.  Delays Worsen Quality of Life Outcome of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  A. Brawanski,et al.  When should conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation be ceased and surgery considered? , 2002, Neurosurgical Review.

[29]  Henry Ahn,et al.  The impact of surgical wait time on patient-based outcomes in posterior lumbar spinal surgery , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[30]  L. Ng,et al.  Predictive value of the duration of sciatica for lumbar discectomy. A prospective cohort study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[31]  A. Levy,et al.  The Effect of Compensation Status on Waiting Time for Elective Surgical Lumbar Discectomy , 2009, Spine.

[32]  H. V. van Houwelingen,et al.  Surgery versus prolonged conservative treatment for sciatica. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  N. Mayo,et al.  Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[34]  B. Koes,et al.  Prolonged conservative care versus early surgery in patients with sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation: two year results of a randomised controlled trial , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  Donald D. Price,et al.  A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales , 1994, Pain.

[36]  T. Hastie,et al.  Regression with an ordered categorical response. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[37]  D. Rubin,et al.  Reducing Bias in Observational Studies Using Subclassification on the Propensity Score , 1984 .

[38]  O. Svensson,et al.  Diagnosis and prognosis in lumbar disc herniation. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  Walter Grassi,et al.  Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale , 2004, European journal of pain.

[40]  Marianne Harming,et al.  Maximum waiting-time guarantee - an attempt to reduce waiting lists in Sweden , 1996 .