A Sidecar Object for the Optimized Communication Between Edge and Cloud in Internet of Things Applications

The internet of things (IoT) is one of the most disrupting revolutions that is characterizing the technology ecosystem. In the near future, the IoT will have a significant impact on people’s lives and on the design and developments of new paradigms and architectures coping with a completely new set of challenges and service categories. The IoT can be described as an ecosystem where a massive number of constrained devices (denoted as smart objects) will be deployed and connected to cooperate for multiple purposes, such a data collection, actuation, and interaction with people. In order to meet the specific requirements, IoT services may be deployed leveraging a hybrid architecture that will involve services deployed on the edge and the cloud. In this context, one of the challenges is to create an infrastructure of objects and microservices operating between both the edge and in the cloud that can be easily updated and extended with new features and functionalities without the need of updating or re-deploying smart objects. This work introduces a new concept for extending smart objects’ support for cloud services, denoted as a sidecar object. A sidecar object serves the purpose of being deployed as additional component of a preexisting object without interfering with the mechanisms and behaviors that have already been implemented. In particular, the sidecar object implementation developed in this work focuses on the communication with existing IoT cloud services (namely, AWS IoT and Google Cloud IoT) to provide a transparent and seamless synchronization of data, states, and commands between the object on the edge and the cloud. The proposed sidecar object implementation has been extensively evaluated through a detailed set of tests, in order to analyze the performances and behaviors in real- world scenarios.

[1]  Theo Lynn,et al.  A Preliminary Review of Enterprise Serverless Cloud Computing (Function-as-a-Service) Platforms , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom).

[2]  Mario Nemirovsky,et al.  Key ingredients in an IoT recipe: Fog Computing, Cloud computing, and more Fog Computing , 2014, 2014 IEEE 19th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD).

[3]  Asif Khan,et al.  Key Characteristics of a Container Orchestration Platform to Enable a Modern Application , 2017, IEEE Cloud Computing.

[4]  Levent Gürgen,et al.  Sharing user IoT devices in the cloud , 2014, 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[5]  Andreas Kliem,et al.  Towards Container-Based Resource Management for the Internet of Things , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Software Networking (ICSN).

[6]  Eui-nam Huh,et al.  Smart gateway based communication for cloud of things , 2014, ISSNIP.

[7]  Joel Nider,et al.  Cross-ISA Container Migration , 2016, SYSTOR.

[8]  Björn Butzin,et al.  Microservices approach for the internet of things , 2016, 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA).

[9]  Luigi Atzori,et al.  The Virtual Object as a Major Element of the Internet of Things: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Soumya Kanti Datta,et al.  An edge computing architecture integrating virtual IoT devices , 2017, 2017 IEEE 6th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE).

[11]  Stephen Ennis,et al.  Cloud Event Programming Paradigms: Applications and Analysis , 2016, 2016 IEEE 9th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD).

[12]  Eui-Nam Huh,et al.  Cloud of Things: Integrating Internet of Things and cloud computing and the issues involved , 2014, Proceedings of 2014 11th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences & Technology (IBCAST) Islamabad, Pakistan, 14th - 18th January, 2014.

[13]  Antonio Iera,et al.  Evaluating Performance of Containerized IoT Services for Clustered Devices at the Network Edge , 2017, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[14]  Simon Mayer,et al.  Moving Application Logic from the Firmware to the Cloud: Towards the Thin Server Architecture for the Internet of Things , 2012, 2012 Sixth International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing.

[15]  Kin K. Leung,et al.  Live Service Migration in Mobile Edge Clouds , 2017, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[16]  Roberto Morabito,et al.  Virtualization on Internet of Things Edge Devices With Container Technologies: A Performance Evaluation , 2017, IEEE Access.

[17]  Gianluigi Ferrari,et al.  Virtual Replication of IoT Hubs in the Cloud: A Flexible Approach to Smart Object Management , 2018, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[18]  Juan C. Vasquez,et al.  An open virtual neighbourhood network to connect IoT infrastructures and smart objects — Vicinity: IoT enables interoperability as a service , 2017, 2017 Global Internet of Things Summit (GIoTS).