Probabilistic Models for Shapes as Continuous Curves

We develop new shape models by defining a standard shape from which we can explain shape deformation and variability. Currently, planar shapes are modelled using a function space, which is applied to data extracted from images. We regard a shape as a continuous curve and identified on the Wiener measure space whereas previous methods have primarily used sparse sets of landmarks expressed in a Euclidean space. The average of a sample set of shapes is defined using measurable functions which treat the Wiener measure as varying Gaussians. Various types of invariance of our formulation of an average are examined in regard to practical applications of it. The average is examined with relation to a Fréchet mean in order to establish its validity. In contrast to a Fréchet mean, however, the average always exists and is unique in the Wiener space. We show that the average lies within the range of deformations present in the sample set. In addition, a measurement, which we call a quasi-score, is defined in order to evaluate “averages” computed by different shape methods, and to measure the overall deformation in a sample set of shapes. We show that the average defined within our model has the least spread compared with methods based on eigenstructure. We also derive a model to compactly express shape variation which comprises the average generated from our model. Some examples of average shape and deformation are presented using well-known datasets and we compare our model to previous work.

[1]  Dominik S. Meier,et al.  Parameter space warping: shape-based correspondence between morphologically different objects , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  Martin Styner,et al.  Shape versus Size: Improved Understanding of the Morphology of Brain Structures , 2001, MICCAI.

[3]  Martin Styner,et al.  Medial Models Incorporating Object Variability for 3D Shape Analysis , 2001, IPMI.

[4]  J. Troutman Variational Calculus and Optimal Control: Optimization with Elementary Convexity , 1995 .

[5]  Gunnar Sparr,et al.  A Common Framework for Kinetic Depth, Reconstruction and Motion for Deformable Objects , 1994, ECCV.

[6]  Huiling Le,et al.  Estimating Fréchet means in Bookstein's shape space , 2000, Advances in Applied Probability.

[7]  Gunnar Sparr Depth computations from polyhedral images , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[8]  D. Kendall SHAPE MANIFOLDS, PROCRUSTEAN METRICS, AND COMPLEX PROJECTIVE SPACES , 1984 .

[9]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  A Framework for Uncertainty and Validation of 3-D Registration Methods Based on Points and Frames , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  H. Le MEAN SIZE-AND-SHAPES AND MEAN SHAPES: A GEOMETRIC POINT OF VIEW , 1995 .

[11]  W. Rudin Real and complex analysis , 1968 .

[12]  Ch. Brechbuhler,et al.  Parameterisation of closed surfaces for 3-D shape description , 1995 .

[13]  Kellen Petersen August Real Analysis , 2009 .

[14]  H. Le,et al.  ON THE CONSISTENCY OF PROCRUSTEAN MEAN SHAPES , 1998 .

[15]  Huiling Le,et al.  The Fréchet mean shape and the shape of the means , 2000, Advances in Applied Probability.

[16]  J. F. C. Kingman,et al.  STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THE WIENER INTEGRAL , 1974 .

[17]  W. Rudin Principles of mathematical analysis , 1964 .

[18]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Analysis of planar shapes using geodesic paths on shape spaces , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  James S. Duncan,et al.  Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  C. Small The statistical theory of shape , 1996 .

[22]  Michel L. Lapidus,et al.  The Feynman Integral and Feynman's Operational Calculus , 2000 .

[23]  H. Le,et al.  Locating Fréchet means with application to shape spaces , 2001, Advances in Applied Probability.

[24]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Segmentation of 2-D and 3-D objects from MRI volume data using constrained elastic deformations of flexible Fourier contour and surface models , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  K. Mardia,et al.  Shape distributions for landmark data , 1989, Advances in Applied Probability.

[26]  John L. Troutman,et al.  Variational Calculus and Optimal Control , 1996 .

[27]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Uniform Distribution, Distance and Expectation Problems for Geometric Features Processing , 1998, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[28]  J. Gower Generalized procrustes analysis , 1975 .

[29]  H. Karcher Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing , 1977 .

[30]  K. Mardia,et al.  General shape distributions in a plane , 1991, Advances in Applied Probability.

[31]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Statistical models of appearance for computer vision , 1999 .

[32]  Xavier Pennec,et al.  Intrinsic Statistics on Riemannian Manifolds: Basic Tools for Geometric Measurements , 2006, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[33]  F. Bookstein Size and Shape Spaces for Landmark Data in Two Dimensions , 1986 .

[34]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Elastic model-based segmentation of 3-D neuroradiological data sets , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  Dimitris N. Metaxas,et al.  Dynamic 3D models with local and global deformations: deformable superquadrics , 1990, [1990] Proceedings Third International Conference on Computer Vision.

[36]  Hans Henrik Thodberg,et al.  Minimum Description Length Shape and Appearance Models , 2003, IPMI.

[37]  David H. Eberly,et al.  Zoom-Invariant Vision of Figural Shape: The Mathematics of Cores , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[38]  Astrom An affine invariant deformable shape representation for general curves , 2003, ICCV 2003.

[39]  Kalle Åström,et al.  Extension of Affine Shape , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[40]  D'arcy W. Thompson On growth and form i , 1943 .

[41]  Gunnar Sparr,et al.  Euclidean and Affine Structure/Motion for Uncalibrated Cameras from Affine Shape and Subsidiary Information , 1998, SMILE.

[42]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Automatic construction of eigenshape models by direct optimization , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[43]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Robust active appearance models and their application to medical image analysis , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A Minimum Description Length Approach to Statistical Shape Modelling , 2001 .

[45]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Gaussian Distributions on Lie Groups and Their Application to Statistical Shape Analysis , 2003, IPMI.

[46]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[47]  Stephen R. Marsland,et al.  Constructing Diffeomorphic Representations of Non-rigid Registrations of Medical Images , 2003, IPMI.

[48]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Segmentation, registration, and measurement of shape variation via image object shape , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  Kalle Åström,et al.  An affine invariant deformable shape representation for general curves , 2003, Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[50]  Robert Bartle,et al.  The Elements of Real Analysis , 1977, The Mathematical Gazette.

[51]  Mark S. C. Reed,et al.  Method of Modern Mathematical Physics , 1972 .

[52]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  Principal geodesic analysis for the study of nonlinear statistics of shape , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[53]  W. Rudin Real and complex analysis, 3rd ed. , 1987 .

[54]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[55]  M. Fréchet Les éléments aléatoires de nature quelconque dans un espace distancié , 1948 .