Identifying Consistent Variables in a Heterogeneous Data Set: Evaluation of a Web-Based Pre-Course in Mathematics.

E-learning has made course evaluation easier in many ways, as a multitude of learner data can be collected and related to student performance. At the same time, open learning environments can be a difficult field for evaluation, with a large variance in participants’ knowledge level, learner behaviour, and commitment. In this study the effectiveness of a mathematics pre-course administered to four cohorts of prospective students at a technical faculty in Germany was evaluated. Deficits in basic mathematics knowledge are considered one risk factor regarding graduation in STEM-related subjects, thus the overall goal was to investigate if the pre-course enabled “at risk” students to improve their starting position. A data analysis was performed, relating students’ preconditions when entering university, their attitude towards mathematics, and their use of learning strategies with further study success. The strongest determinant of first year performance were results in a diagnostic pretest, confirming both the importance of basic mathematics knowledge for academic achievement in engineering and the reliability of the chosen pre-posttest design. Other outcomes were quite unexpected and demanded deeper analyses. Students who had participated in additional face-toface courses, for example, showed less learning gains than students who had participated in an e-tutoring version. It also could be observed that meta-cognitive variables failed to explain successful course participation. Reasons for these outcomes are discussed, suggesting reliability threats and interactions between students’ preconditions and their learner behaviour. A significant and unmoderated impact on students’ learning gains in the pre-course was found for the number of online test attempts, making this variable a reliable indicator of student engagement. The evaluations show that open learning designs with heterogeneous learner groups can deliver meaningful information, provided that limitations are considered and that external references, like academic grades, are available in order to establish consistency.

[1]  E. Kokkelenberg,et al.  Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students , 2010 .

[2]  G. Smith,et al.  Student Attrition in Mathematics E-Learning , 2005 .

[3]  Zheng Yan,et al.  Factors affecting response rates of the web survey: A systematic review , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  R. Hambleton,et al.  Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications , 1984 .

[5]  Vincent Donche,et al.  Profiling First-Year Students in STEM Programs Based on Autonomous Motivation and Academic Self-Concept and Relationship with Academic Achievement , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  Victor Thiessen,et al.  Mathematics Achievement and Mathematics Learning Strategies: Cognitive Competencies and Construct Differentiation. , 2008 .

[7]  John Sweller,et al.  Levels of knowledge and deliberate practice. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[8]  Yu Xie,et al.  Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes , 2003 .

[9]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Mining LMS data to develop an "early warning system" for educators: A proof of concept , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[10]  Perry J. Samson,et al.  Can student engagement be measured? And, if so, does it matter? , 2015, 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[11]  Ailish Hannigan,et al.  Trends in the mathematical competency of university entrants in Ireland by leaving certificate mathematics grade , 2010 .

[12]  Dan Budny,et al.  Assessment of the Impact of Freshman Engineering Courses * , 1998 .

[13]  Nélia Amado,et al.  Teaching Mathematics and its Applications , 2016 .

[14]  Ailish Hannigan,et al.  The role of prior mathematical experience in predicting mathematics performance in higher education , 2014 .

[15]  Ronald G. Ehrenberg Analyzing the factors that influence persistence rates in STEM field, majors: Introduction to the symposium , 2010 .

[16]  Phillip L. Ackerman,et al.  Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences. , 2013 .

[17]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[18]  P. Spooren,et al.  On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching , 2013 .

[19]  James D. Klein,et al.  Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice , 2005, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[20]  P. Pintrich A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). , 1991 .

[21]  Russel L. Thompson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys , 2000 .

[22]  C. Abraham,et al.  Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  M. J. Chang,et al.  From Gatekeeping to Engagement: A Multicontextual, Mixed Method Study of Student Academic Engagement in Introductory STEM Courses , 2011, Research in higher education.

[24]  Kristy J. Lauver,et al.  Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Sebastián Ventura,et al.  Educational Data Mining: A Review of the State of the Art , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[26]  Carol L. Robinson,et al.  Recruitment and retention of students–an integrated and holistic vision of mathematics support , 2009 .

[27]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Student data: data is knowledge – putting the knowledge back in the students’ hands , 2015 .

[28]  Eric Kuennen,et al.  Basic Math Skills and Performance in an Introductory Statistics Course , 2006 .

[29]  William Sadera,et al.  Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. , 2011 .

[30]  Djordje Kadijevich,et al.  DEVELOPING TRUSTWORTHY TIMSS BACKGROUND MEASURES: A CASE STUDY ON MATHEMATICS ATTITUDE , 2007 .

[31]  Jon Warwick,et al.  A Pilot Study in the Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Predict Student Performance in Mathematics , 2007 .

[32]  M. Kane Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores , 2013 .

[33]  Tony Croft,et al.  Does Students' Confidence in Their Ability in Mathematics Matter?. , 2009 .

[34]  Ulrich Schiefele,et al.  Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens. , 1994 .

[35]  Hannah D. Street,et al.  Factors Influencing a Learner's Decision to Drop-Out or Persist in Higher Education Distance Learning , 2010 .

[36]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[37]  Elizabeth Johnson,et al.  A hybrid model of mathematics support for science students emphasizing basic skills and discipline relevance , 2013 .

[38]  G. Gibbs,et al.  Conditions Under Which Assessment Supports Students’ Learning , 2005 .

[39]  Melanie Parker,et al.  Placement, Retention, and Success: A Longitudinal Study of Mathematics and Retention , 2005, The Journal of General Education.

[40]  Matthew W. Ohland,et al.  Identifying Factors Influencing Engineering Student Graduation: A Longitudinal and Cross‐Institutional Study , 2004 .