Assessing epistemic sophistication by considering domain-specific absolute and multiplicistic beliefs separately.

BACKGROUND Particularly in higher education, not only a view of science as a means of finding absolute truths (absolutism), but also a view of science as generally tentative (multiplicism) can be unsophisticated and obstructive for learning. Most quantitative epistemic belief inventories neglect this and understand epistemic sophistication as disagreement with absolute statements. AIMS This article suggests considering absolutism and multiplicism as separate dimensions. Following our understanding of epistemic sophistication as a cautious and reluctant endorsement of both positions, we assume evaluativism (a contextually adaptive view of knowledge as personally constructed and evidence-based) to be reflected by low agreement with both generalized absolute and generalized multiplicistic statements. SAMPLES Three studies with a total sample size of N = 416 psychology students were conducted. METHODS A domain-specific inventory containing both absolute and multiplicistic statements was developed. Expectations were tested by exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlational analyses. RESULTS Results revealed a two-factor solution with an absolute and a multiplicistic factor. Criterion validity of both factors was confirmed. Cross-sectional analyses revealed that agreement to generalized multiplicistic statements decreases with study progress. Moreover, consistent with our understanding of epistemic sophistication as a reluctant attitude towards generalized epistemic statements, evidence for a negative relationship between epistemic sophistication and need for cognitive closure was found. CONCLUSIONS We recommend including multiplicistic statements into epistemic belief questionnaires and considering them as a separate dimension, especially when investigating individuals in later stages of epistemic development (i.e., in higher education).

[1]  Huy P Phan.  Predicting change in epistemological beliefs, reflective thinking and learning styles: a longitudinal study. , 2008, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Approaching and avoiding arguments: The role of epistemological beliefs, need for cognition, and extraverted personality traits , 2003 .

[3]  P. Alexander,et al.  Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? , 2002 .

[4]  Ioanna Vekiri,et al.  Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students , 2004 .

[5]  Lisa D. Bendixen,et al.  Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. , 2012 .

[6]  B. Hofer.  Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching , 2001 .

[7]  Ulrich Trautwein,et al.  Predicting global and topic-specific certainty beliefs: domain-specificity and the role of the academic environment. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  B. Hofer,et al.  Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[9]  Susanne Schlink,et al.  Kurz und gut: Eine deutsche Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Bedürfnisses nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit , 2007 .

[10]  E. Stahl,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext , 2008 .

[11]  Michael Paulsen.  Epistemological Beliefs and Self-Regulated Learning. , 1999 .

[12]  D. Kuhn.  THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.

[13]  Marlene Schommer.  Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[14]  Teresa K. Debacker,et al.  Influences on cognitive engagement: epistemological beliefs and need for closure. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[15]  Andrew Elby,et al.  On the Substance of a Sophisticated Epistemology. , 2001 .

[16]  Jeremy Miles,et al.  Discovering statistics using R, 1st Edition , 2012 .

[17]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Characterizing Fifth Grade Students’ Epistemological Beliefs in Science , 2001 .

[18]  Roger A. Sugden,et al.  Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys , 1988 .

[19]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling , 2003 .

[21]  Marlene Schommer.  Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. , 1993 .

[22]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Statistical Analysis with Missing Data: Little/Statistical Analysis with Missing Data , 2002 .

[23]  Marlene Schommer.  The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs , 1998 .

[24]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Justification beliefs and multiple-documents comprehension , 2013 .

[25]  P. Pintrich,et al.  The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .

[26]  C. Kardash,et al.  Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific beliefs on undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dual-positional text. , 2000 .

[27]  G. Krampen,et al.  Need for cognitive closure may impede the effectiveness of epistemic belief instruction , 2016 .

[28]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  The CAEB: An instrument for measuring connotative aspects of epistemological beliefs , 2007 .

[29]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  The Reflective Judgment Model: Twenty Years of Research on Epistemic Cognition , 2001 .

[30]  Øistein Anmarkrud,et al.  Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. , 2014, The British journal of educational psychology.

[31]  Russell V. Lenth,et al.  Statistical Analysis With Missing Data (2nd ed.) (Book) , 2004 .

[32]  F. Cano,et al.  Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.

[33]  Michael Weinstock,et al.  The development of epistemological understanding , 2000 .

[34]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  DOMAIN DIFFERENCES IN THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS OF COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1998 .

[35]  Xihui Wang,et al.  Examining the influences of epistemic beliefs and knowledge representations on cognitive processing and conceptual change when learning physics , 2012 .