Efficiency intervals, rank intervals and dominance relations of decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs

Abstract How to evaluate the performance of decision-making units (DMUs) with fixed-sum outputs is a timely and challenging question in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Two major challenges are (1) how to determine a common equilibrium efficient frontier and (2) how to deal with multiple feasible equilibrium efficient frontiers. This paper first uses a simple dataset to illustrate the possibility of multiple equilibrium efficient frontiers and the corresponding major differences in the DMUs’ efficiencies and rankings resulting from these frontiers. We address these challenges by considering all feasible equilibrium efficient frontiers and develop several models to obtain the corresponding efficiency intervals, ranking intervals and dominance relations for the DMUs with fixed-sum outputs. We illustrate the proposed approach with two numerical examples and show that it gives more informative results than previous DEA approaches. For example, there are interesting dominance relations between DMUs under the fixed-sum outputs; yet these relations do not exist when there are no fixed-sum outputs. In addition, the efficiency ranges and ranking intervals can be narrowed by accounting for policy suggestions such as adjustment constraints of fixed-sum outputs for DMUs.

[1]  Jie Wu,et al.  Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Jie Wu,et al.  Measuring environmental efficiency of thermoelectric power plants: a common equilibrium efficient frontier DEA approach with fixed-sum undesirable output , 2018, Annals of Operations Research.

[3]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  C. Kao,et al.  Predicting bank performance with financial forecasts: A case of Taiwan commercial banks , 2004 .

[5]  Victor V. Podinovski,et al.  DEA models for the explicit maximisation of relative efficiency , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Yongjun Li,et al.  An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Measuring Olympics achievements based on a parallel DEA approach , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[8]  Yongjun Li,et al.  A generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating DMUs with fixed-sum outputs , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Proportional sharing and DEA in allocating the fixed cost , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..

[10]  Zhimin Huang,et al.  Dominance stochastic models in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[11]  Chien-Ming Chen,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A network-DEA model with new efficiency measures to incorporate the dynamic effect in production networks , 2008 .

[12]  Malin Song,et al.  An output-constrained DEA model as applied to efficiency analysis of football clubs , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[13]  Marcos Pereira Estellita Lins,et al.  Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Rowland D. Burdon,et al.  Genotype-environment interaction involving site differences in expression of genetic variation along with genotypic rank changes: simulations of economic significance , 2018, Tree Genetics & Genomes.

[15]  Yung‐ho Chiu,et al.  Carbon Emission Allowances of Efficiency Analysis: Application of Super SBM ZSG-DEA Model , 2013 .

[16]  Jie Wu,et al.  A unique equilibrium efficient frontier with fixed-sum outputs in data envelopment analysis , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Liang Liang,et al.  Allocating Tradable Emissions Permits Based on the Proportional Allocation Concept to Achieve a Low-Carbon Economy , 2014 .

[18]  Nuria Ramón,et al.  Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Incorporating health outcomes in Pennsylvania hospital efficiency: an additive super-efficiency DEA approach , 2014, Ann. Oper. Res..

[20]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[21]  Cláudia S. Sarrico,et al.  Pitfalls and protocols in DEA , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Sohrab Kordrostami,et al.  Context-based competition strategy and performance analysis with fixed-sum outputs: an application to banking sector , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[24]  R. G. Dyson,et al.  Cost efficiency measurement with price uncertainty: a DEA application to bank branch assessments , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Eliane Gonçalves Gomes,et al.  Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Measuring the performance of nations at the Summer Olympics using data envelopment analysis , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[27]  Bo Wang,et al.  Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis , 2014 .

[28]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Models for measuring and benchmarking olympics achievements , 2008 .

[30]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[32]  Ying Huang,et al.  A Modified Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index: Assessing Environmental Productivity Performance in China , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Ranking Intervals and Dominance Relations for Ratio-Based Efficiency Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Yongjun Li,et al.  Ranking intervals for two-stage production systems , 2020, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[35]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[36]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1962 .

[37]  Sebastián Lozano Technical and environmental efficiency of a two-stage production and abatement system , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[38]  Lidia Angulo Meza,et al.  Uniformization of frontiers in non-radial ZSG-DEA models: an application to airport revenues , 2010 .

[39]  Barton A. Smith,et al.  Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas , 1986 .

[40]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[41]  Feng Chu,et al.  The linear formulation of the ZSG-DEA models with different production technologies , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[42]  Lei Fang,et al.  A new approach for achievement of the equilibrium efficient frontier with fixed-sum outputs , 2016, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[43]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..