Non-orthogonal tight-binding models: Problems and possible remedies for realistic nano-scale devices

Due to recent improvements in computing power, non-orthogonal tight-binding models have moved beyond their traditional applications in molecular electronics to nanoelectronics. These models are appealing due to their physical chemistry content and the availability of tabulated material parameterizations. There are, however, problems with them, related to their non-orthogonality, which are more serious in nanoelectronic vs molecular applications. First, the non-orthogonal basis leads to an inherent ambiguity in the charge density. More importantly, there are problems with the position matrix in a non-orthogonal basis. The position matrix must be compatible with the underlying translationally symmetric system, which is not guaranteed if it is calculated with explicit wavefunctions. In an orthogonal basis, the only way to guarantee compatibility and gauge invariance is to use diagonal position matrices, but transforming them to a non-orthogonal basis requires major computational effort in a device consisting of 103–105 atoms. We study the charge density, position matrix, and optical absorption using a non-orthogonal two-band one-dimensional model, comparing correct and approximate calculations. We find that a typical naive calculation produces highly inaccurate results, while in contrast a first-order orthogonalized basis can represent a reasonable accuracy-efficiency trade-off.Due to recent improvements in computing power, non-orthogonal tight-binding models have moved beyond their traditional applications in molecular electronics to nanoelectronics. These models are appealing due to their physical chemistry content and the availability of tabulated material parameterizations. There are, however, problems with them, related to their non-orthogonality, which are more serious in nanoelectronic vs molecular applications. First, the non-orthogonal basis leads to an inherent ambiguity in the charge density. More importantly, there are problems with the position matrix in a non-orthogonal basis. The position matrix must be compatible with the underlying translationally symmetric system, which is not guaranteed if it is calculated with explicit wavefunctions. In an orthogonal basis, the only way to guarantee compatibility and gauge invariance is to use diagonal position matrices, but transforming them to a non-orthogonal basis requires major computational effort in a device consisting...

[1]  Moroni,et al.  Electronic structure of the InAs-GaSb superlattice studied by the renormalization method. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[2]  Gerhard Klimeck,et al.  The discretized Schrödinger equation and simple models for semiconductor quantum wells , 2004 .

[3]  Saurabh Srivastava,et al.  Contact conductance of a graphene nanoribbon with its graphene nano-electrodes. , 2016, Nanoscale.

[4]  J. C. Slater,et al.  Simplified LCAO Method for the Periodic Potential Problem , 1954 .

[5]  Gerhard Klimeck,et al.  Electromagnetic coupling and gauge invariance in the empirical tight-binding method , 2001 .

[6]  J. Cerdá,et al.  Accurate and transferable extended Huckel-type tight-binding parameters , 2000 .

[7]  Graf,et al.  Electromagnetic fields and dielectric response in empirical tight-binding theory. , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[8]  Fabio Beltram,et al.  Empirical spds^* tight-binding calculation for cubic semiconductors : general method and material parameters , 1998 .

[9]  Titus Sandu,et al.  Optical matrix elements in tight-binding models with overlap , 2005 .

[10]  Gerhard Klimeck,et al.  Effective-mass reproducibility of the nearest-neighbor sp 3 s * models: Analytic results , 1997 .

[11]  Peter Vogl,et al.  Dielectric response of molecules in empirical tight-binding theory , 2001 .

[12]  G. Klimeck,et al.  NEMO5: A Parallel Multiscale Nanoelectronics Modeling Tool , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[13]  Leo Esaki,et al.  InAs-GaSb superlattice energy structure and its semiconductor-semimetal transition , 1978 .

[14]  R. Hoffmann.  An Extended Hückel Theory. I. Hydrocarbons , 1963 .

[15]  Tamio Oguchi,et al.  k⋅pformula for use with linearized augmented plane waves , 2008 .

[16]  B. Foreman,et al.  Local Gauge Symmetry in Empirical Tight-Binding Theory , 2001 .

[17]  S. Datta,et al.  Charging-induced asymmetry in molecular conductors , 2004 .

[18]  T. Boykin,et al.  Multiband transmission calculations for nanowires using an optimized renormalization method , 2008 .

[19]  Gengchiau Liang,et al.  Extended Hückel theory for band structure, chemistry, and transport. II. Silicon , 2006 .

[20]  R. S. Mulliken.  Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I , 1955 .

[21]  J. Schrieffer,et al.  Relation between the Anderson and Kondo Hamiltonians , 1966 .

[22]  Gerhard Klimeck,et al.  Development of a Nanoelectronic 3-D (NEMO 3-D ) Simulator for Multimillion Atom Simulations and Its Application to Alloyed Quantum Dots , 2002 .

[23]  Adrian Stoica,et al.  Si Tight-Binding Parameters from Genetic Algorithm Fitting , 2000 .

[24]  T. Boykin,et al.  Diagonal parameter shifts due to nearest-neighbor displacements in empirical tight-binding theory , 2002 .

[25]  Gerhard Klimeck,et al.  Tight-binding analysis of Si and GaAs ultrathin bodies with subatomic wave-function resolution , 2015, Physical Review B.

[26]  T. Cwik,et al.  sp3s* Tight-Binding Parameters for Transport Simulations in Compound Semiconductors , 2000 .

[27]  S. Datta,et al.  A self-consistent transport model for molecular conduction based on extended Hückel theory with full three-dimensional electrostatics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[28]  J. Palacios,et al.  Theory of projections with nonorthogonal basis sets: Partitioning techniques and effective Hamiltonians , 2014, 1404.2043.

[29]  Avik W. Ghosh,et al.  Extended hückel theory for band structure, chemistry, and transport. I. Carbon nanotubes , 2006 .

[30]  G. Klimeck,et al.  Efficient and realistic device modeling from atomic detail to the nanoscale , 2013, 1310.4805.

[31]  Boykin,et al.  Incorporation of incompleteness in the k , 1995, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[32]  P. Löwdin.  On the Non‐Orthogonality Problem Connected with the Use of Atomic Wave Functions in the Theory of Molecules and Crystals , 1950 .

[33]  Kurt Stokbro,et al.  First-principles modelling of molecular single-electron transistors , 2010, 1006.0082.

[34]  Gerhard Klimeck,et al.  Single and multiband modeling of quantum electron transport through layered semiconductor devices , 1997 .