The Langley Stability and Transition Analysis Code (LASTRAC) : LST, Linear and Nonlinear PSE for 2-D, Axisymmetric, and Infinite Swept Wing Boundary Layers

Summary Predicting transition onset remains a daunting task evenwith the state-of-the-art computing facilities. At the lowestfidelity, transition may be predicted by using a prescribedN-factor and a simple linear stability or parabolized sta-bility theory. Depending on the accuracy requirement, theN-value may come from empirical correlations with exist-ing wind tunnel or flight experiments, or from a commonlyused value such as 10. The major problem of this approachlies in the N-value itself. According to past experiences,the transition N-value may vary from as small as 2 or 3for a noisy facility to as high as 15 or 20 in flight. Thus,for a new configuration, determining the N value is itself adifficult task. Despite this uncertainty, N-factor correlationremains the most viable method for transition predictiondue to its simplicity. LASTRAC provide both LST- andPSE-based N-factor correlation capability.For a given mean flow, a possible unstable frequencyrange is suggested by LASTRAC and by using the max-imizing N-factor option, users may obtain an unstableparameter range of disturbance frequency and spanwisewavelength with minimum effort and little prior knowledgeof the mean flow under consideration. Further linear calcu-lations using either quasi-parallel LST or nonparallel PSEmay be launched to obtain an envelop of N-factors formedby a broad range of unstable modes. The N-factor envelopethen can be used for transition correlations or predictions.LASTRAC also provides the capability to compute dis-turbance evolution based on an absolute amplitude. Non-linear PSE calculations may be performed for a numberof unstable modes with a finite amplitude. We show sev-eral test cases in which the boundary layer is perturbedwith a given amplitude and transition is captured by us-ing the nonlinear PSE option. Coupled with the receptivitymodel which will be incorporated in the near future, LAS-TRAC offers a transition prediction tool that may be used tocompute transition onset without any modeling or N-factorassumptions.It is also demonstrated that LASTRAC may be used forparametric studies of several supersonic laminar flow con-trol concepts. We presented two such techniques, thermaland distributed roughness control. The test cases shown inthis paper cover a broad range of flow configurations. In ad-dition to the traditional N-factor method, LASTRAC offersa comprehensive set of options based on the state-of-the-artnumerical methods that may be used for the stability calcu-lations and transition predictions in an integrated fashion.

[1]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Nonparallel stability of boundary‐layer flows , 1975 .

[2]  A. Tumin,et al.  Evolution of Disturbances in Entropy Layer on Blunted Plate in Supersonic Flow , 2004 .

[3]  William S. Saric,et al.  Leading-Edge Roughness as a Transition Control Mechanism , 1998 .

[4]  Chau-Lyan Chang,et al.  Non-parallel stability of compressible boundary layers , 1993 .

[5]  Mujeeb Malik,et al.  A SOLUTION ADAPTIVE APPROACH FOR COMPUTATION OF LINEAR WAVES , 1997 .

[6]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Natural Laminar Flow for Quiet and Efficient Supersonic Aircraft , 2002 .

[7]  Chau-Lyan Chang,et al.  Oblique-mode breakdown and secondary instability in supersonic boundary layers , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[8]  Chau-Lyan Chang Langley Stability and Transition Analysis Code (LASTRAC) Version 1.2 User Manual , 2004 .

[9]  C. L. Streett,et al.  Integrated Transition Prediction: A Case Study in Supersonic Laminar Flow Control , 2003 .

[10]  William S. Saric,et al.  Experiments in nonlinear saturation of stationary crossflow vortices in a swept-wing boundary layer , 1996 .

[11]  Ali H. Nayfeh,et al.  Non-parallel stability of boundary layer flows , 1975 .

[12]  Ivar Jacobson,et al.  The unified modeling language reference manual , 2010 .

[13]  Kenneth F. Stetson,et al.  Laminar boundary layer stability experiments on a cone at Mach 8. I - Sharp cone , 1983 .

[14]  Robert R Choudhari Statistical prediction of laminar-turbulent transition , 2000 .

[15]  William S. Saric,et al.  Supersonic Laminar Flow Control on Swept Wings Using Distributed Roughness Stability Analysis and Computations , 2002 .

[16]  M. Malik Numerical methods for hypersonic boundary layer stability , 1990 .

[17]  Meelan Choudhari,et al.  Secondary instability of crossflow vortices and swept-wing boundary-layer transition , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Alexander A. Stepanov,et al.  C++ Standard Template Library , 2000 .

[19]  Fei Li,et al.  On the nature of PSE approximation , 1996 .

[20]  Xiaolin Zhong,et al.  RECEPTIVITY AND LINEAR STABILITY OF STETSON'S MACH 8 BLUNT CONE STABILITY EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[21]  J. C. Tannehill,et al.  Calculation of supersonic viscous flow over delta wings with sharp subsonic leading edges , 1978 .

[22]  C. L. Streett Direct Harmonic Linear Navier-Stokes Methods for Efficient Simulation of Wave Packets , 1998 .

[23]  Ndaona Chokani,et al.  Boundary-layer stability measurements in a hypersonic quiet tunnel , 1996 .

[24]  Alexander Fedorov,et al.  Receptivity of a high-speed boundary layer to acoustic disturbances , 2003, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[25]  L. Mack Boundary-Layer Linear Stability Theory , 1984 .

[26]  M. Y. Hussaini,et al.  Compressible stability of growing boundary layers using parabolized stability equations , 1991 .

[27]  Scott A. Berry,et al.  Boundary Layer Transition on Slender Cones in Conventional and Low Disturbance Mach 6 Wind Tunnels , 2002 .