Language learning, language use and the evolution of linguistic variation

Linguistic universals arise from the interaction between the processes of language learning and language use. A test case for the relationship between these factors is linguistic variation, which tends to be conditioned on linguistic or sociolinguistic criteria. How can we explain the scarcity of unpredictable variation in natural language, and to what extent is this property of language a straightforward reflection of biases in statistical learning? We review three strands of experimental work exploring these questions, and introduce a Bayesian model of the learning and transmission of linguistic variation along with a closely matched artificial language learning experiment with adult participants. Our results show that while the biases of language learners can potentially play a role in shaping linguistic systems, the relationship between biases of learners and the structure of languages is not straightforward. Weak biases can have strong effects on language structure as they accumulate over repeated transmission. But the opposite can also be true: strong biases can have weak or no effects. Furthermore, the use of language during interaction can reshape linguistic systems. Combining data and insights from studies of learning, transmission and use is therefore essential if we are to understand how biases in statistical learning interact with language transmission and language use to shape the structural properties of language. This article is part of the themed issue ‘New frontiers for statistical learning in the cognitive sciences’.

[1]  T. M. Ellison,et al.  Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  E. Wonnacott Balancing generalization and lexical conservatism: An artificial language study with child learners , 2011 .

[3]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Innateness and culture in the evolution of language , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Regularization behavior in a non-linguistic domain , 2013, CogSci.

[5]  Amy Perfors,et al.  When do memory limitations lead to regularization? An experimental and computational investigation , 2012 .

[6]  O. Feher,et al.  Structural priming in artificial languages and the regularisation of unpredictable variation , 2016 .

[7]  Jules D. Gliesche Review of Principles of Linguistic Change: Social factors , 2005 .

[8]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  E. Newport,et al.  Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  L. Steels Modeling the cultural evolution of language. , 2011, Physics of life reviews.

[11]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  The evolution of frequency distributions: Relating regularization to inductive biases through iterated learning , 2009, Cognition.

[12]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Interactive Evolution of Human Communication Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[13]  Harold R. Kerbo,et al.  SOCIAL STRATIFICATION , 2004 .

[14]  W. Labov The social stratification of English in New York City , 1969 .

[15]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  The impact of conditioning variables on the acquisition of variation in adult and child learners , 2015 .

[16]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Investigating the cause of language regularization in adults: memory constraints or learning effects? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  Carla L. Hudson Kam,et al.  Regularizing Unpredictable Variation: The Roles of Adult and Child Learners in Language Formation and Change , 2005 .

[18]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Language as shaped by the brain. , 2008, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[19]  T. Givón,et al.  Function, structure, and language acquisition. , 1985 .

[20]  Simon Kirby,et al.  The cognitive roots of regularization in language , 2017, Cognition.

[21]  E. Clark On the logic of contrast. , 1988, Journal of child language.

[22]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Learning biases predict a word order universal , 2012, Cognition.

[23]  P. Trudgill The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich , 1974 .

[24]  Kenny Smith,et al.  Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning , 2010, Cognition.

[25]  T. Griffiths,et al.  ITERATED LEARNING OF MULTIPLE LANGUAGES FROM MULTIPLE TEACHERS , 2010 .

[26]  N. Komarova,et al.  Regularization of languages by adults and children: A mathematical framework , 2016, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  P E N E L O P E E C K,et al.  New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research , 1999 .

[28]  D. Schiffrin Meaning, form, and use in context : linguistic applications , 1984 .

[29]  D. Slobin,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 2000 .

[30]  M. Pickering,et al.  Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Amy Perfors,et al.  Adult Regularization of Inconsistent Input Depends on Pragmatic Factors , 2016 .

[32]  Kenny Smith,et al.  Acquiring variation in an artificial language: Children and adults are sensitive to socially conditioned linguistic variation , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Bruno Galantucci,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Emergence of Human Communication Systems , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Olga Feher,et al.  Eliminating unpredictable linguistic variation through interaction , 2014, CogSci.

[35]  J. Stuart-Smith Glottals Past and Present: a Study of T-glottalling in Glaswegian , 1999 .

[36]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Is probability matching smart? Associations between probabilistic choices and cognitive ability , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Michael Ramscar,et al.  Linguistic Self-Correction in the Absence of Feedback: A New Approach to the Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[38]  E. Newport,et al.  Harmonic biases in child learners: In support of language universals , 2015, Cognition.

[39]  Deborah Cameron,et al.  Language, Gender, and Sexuality: Current Issues and New Directions , 2005 .