Guidance to improve the scientific value of zeta-potential measurements in nanoEHS

Nanoparticle zeta-potentials are relatively easy to measure, and have consistently been proposed in guidance documents as a particle property that must be included for complete nanoparticle characterization. There is also an increasing interest in integrating data collected on nanomaterial properties and behavior measured in different systems (e.g. in vitro assays, surface water, soil) to identify the properties controlling nanomaterial fate and effects, to be able to integrate and reuse datasets beyond their original intent, and ultimately to predict behaviors of new nanomaterials based on their measured properties (i.e. read across), including zeta-potential. Several confounding factors pose difficulty in taking, integrating and interpreting this measurement consistently. Zeta-potential is a modeled quantity determined from measurements of the electrophoretic mobility in a suspension, and its value depends on the nanomaterial properties, the solution conditions, and the theoretical model applied. The ability to use zeta-potential as an explanatory variable for measured behaviors in different systems (or potentially to predict specific behaviors) therefore requires robust reporting with relevant meta-data for the measurement conditions and the model used to convert mobility measurements to zeta-potentials. However, there is currently no such standardization for reporting in the nanoEHS literature. The objective of this tutorial review is to familiarize the nanoEHS research community with the zeta-potential concept and the factors that influence its calculated value and interpretation, including the effects of adsorbed macromolecules. We also provide practical guidance on the precision of measurement, interpretation of zeta-potential as an explanatory variable for processes of interest (e.g. toxicity, environmental fate), and provide advice for addressing common challenges associated with making meaningful zeta-potential measurements using commercial instruments. Finally, we provide specific guidance on the parameters that need to be reported with zeta-potential measurements to maximize interpretability and to support scientific synthesis across data sets.

[1]  Reghan J. Hill,et al.  Electrophoresis of spherical polymer-coated colloidal particles , 2003 .

[2]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  A functional assay-based strategy for nanomaterial risk forecasting. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  Sara Linse,et al.  Understanding the nanoparticle–protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Pakatip Ruenraroengsak,et al.  Differential bioreactivity of neutral, cationic and anionic polystyrene nanoparticles with cells from the human alveolar compartment: robust response of alveolar type 1 epithelial cells , 2015, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[5]  Stacey L. Harper,et al.  Proactively designing nanomaterials to enhance performance and minimise hazard , 2008 .

[6]  D. C. Henry The cataphoresis of suspended particles. Part I.—The equation of cataphoresis , 1931 .

[7]  Fritz H Frimmel,et al.  Influence of the zeta potential on the sorption and toxicity of iron oxide nanoparticles on S. cerevisiae and E. coli. , 2010, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[8]  Harold A. Abramson,et al.  Electrophoresis of Proteins and the Chemistry of Cell Surfaces. , 1942 .

[9]  Christie M. Sayes,et al.  The relationship between pH and zeta potential of ∼ 30 nm metal oxide nanoparticle suspensions relevant to in vitro toxicological evaluations , 2009 .

[10]  Pratim Biswas,et al.  Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies , 2009 .

[11]  Sudipta Seal,et al.  Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[12]  Mark R. Wiesner,et al.  Nanoparticle core properties affect attachment of macromolecule-coated nanoparticles to silica surfaces , 2014 .

[13]  J. Lyklema,et al.  Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2005 .

[14]  J Horno,et al.  Numerical study of colloidal suspensions of soft spherical particles using the network method. 1. DC electrophoretic mobility. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  Peter Self,et al.  Surface chemistry and rheological behaviour of titania pigment suspensions , 1999 .

[16]  R. J. Hunter,et al.  Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2005 .

[17]  D. Haydon,et al.  A study of the relation between electrokinetic potential and surface charge density , 1960, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[18]  Sonja Boland,et al.  Acute exposure to silica nanoparticles enhances mortality and increases lung permeability in a mouse model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia , 2014, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[19]  Ponisseril Somasundaran,et al.  Physico-chemical properties of human plasma fibronectin binding to well characterized titanium dioxide , 1998 .

[20]  Clemens Burda,et al.  Electrophoretic Interpretation of PEGylated NP Structure with and without Peripheral Charge. , 2015, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[21]  F. Booth,et al.  The cataphoresis of spherical, solid non-conducting particles in a symmetrical electrolyte , 1950, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  Christophe Geantet,et al.  Long-term aging of a CeO(2) based nanocomposite used for wood protection. , 2014, Environmental pollution.

[23]  Conrad Coester,et al.  Particle and Fibre Toxicology BioMed Central Methodology , 2008 .

[24]  Silvana Andreescu,et al.  Toxicity and developmental defects of different sizes and shape nickel nanoparticles in zebrafish. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  R. J. Hunter Zeta potential in colloid science : principles and applications , 1981 .

[26]  Michala E Pettitt,et al.  Minimum physicochemical characterisation requirements for nanomaterial regulation. , 2013, Environment international.

[27]  Lee R. White,et al.  Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle , 1978 .

[28]  Nathalie Tufenkji,et al.  Effect of particle size and natural organic matter on the migration of nano- and microscale latex particles in saturated porous media. , 2008, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[29]  Reghan J. Hill,et al.  Corona charge regulation in nanoparticle electrophoresis , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[30]  Ralf Zimmermann,et al.  Electrokinetics of soft polymeric interphases with layered distribution of anionic and cationic charges , 2016 .

[31]  H. Ohshima,et al.  Electrophopretic mobility of soft particles. , 1994, Electrophoresis.

[32]  Mitchell J Small,et al.  Correlation of the physicochemical properties of natural organic matter samples from different sources to their effects on gold nanoparticle aggregation in monovalent electrolyte. , 2015, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Navid B. Saleh,et al.  Titanium dioxide (P25) produces reactive oxygen species in immortalized brain microglia (BV2): implications for nanoparticle neurotoxicity. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.