Characterising the Creative Behaviour of Designers within the Late-Stage Engineering Design Process

Creativity is widely recognised as a vital element in modern-day engineering design. It is through creative behaviour that engineering designers produce creative solutions to their problems, and through creative solutions that many companies succeed. However, research into creative behaviour within engineering design has to date focused largely on the design process in general or on early-stage design; neglecting the often complex and constrained engineering practice that occurs during later design stages. It is to this research focus that the work presented here has been completed. Defined through its production of outputs that are original, of appropriate quality, and surprising, creative design behaviour is a culmination of several aspects within the engineering process; that of a person or team; working within a specific context; actively completing a process; that will produce an output for a particular design brief. At the centre of this situation is then the designer; it is through their individual behaviours that creative outputs are formed. Due to the nature of the later stage engineering design process, the accompanying influences under which designers work, and the types of activity that they complete, it presents a very different situation to early-stage design. It is therefore not possible to assume that understanding based on study of either early-stage design or the design process in general is entirely applicable to later-stage design processes or to the type of support that designers working within may need. Thus, when linked to creative behaviour, this presents an opportunity for research; there is possibility to gain valuable understanding of the manner in which creative solutions are produced through the study of designers’ creative behaviour in later-stage design. It is to this goal that this research has been performed, namely to characterise the creative behaviour of designers within the later-stages of the engineering design process. To this end, this thesis presents a detailed review of the field of creativity, the field of engineering design, and current understanding of designer behaviour. From the understanding that each of these provides, a framework and coding scheme are then developed, which are designed to identify creative behaviour within the individual tasks of designers throughout the design process. This coding scheme is then used within three studies; one based on seven less-experienced designers working within a 22-week project, one of eighteen designers of varying experience undertaking a design brief set by the author, and one of four designers working within industry. Through analysis of the data produced by these studies, this thesis contributes several characterisations of designer behaviour within later-stage design. These include typical task-types in which all designers are creative, two distinct creative approaches that correlate with a designers personal creative style, and types of tasks to complete in order encourage streamlining of the design process; in addition to more general characterisations concerning designer focus within early and late-stage design, and differences in behaviour between expert and less-experienced designers. Through the understanding that this research has gained and presents within this thesis there are many opportunities for further work on the subject of the improvement and support of designer behaviour. Both within an academic and industrial context, detailed and specific characterisation of creative behaviour in later-stage design has the potential to provide the means to improve both the process and output of engineering design.

[1]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of creativity. , 2010 .

[2]  Patricia D. Stokes,et al.  Using constraints to generate and sustain novelty. , 2007 .

[3]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Descriptive models of creative design: application to an example , 1997 .

[4]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[5]  S. Mednick The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[6]  D. Bandalos,et al.  A Report on the 40-Year Follow-Up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and Well in the New Millennium , 2005 .

[7]  W. Sauser,et al.  Creativity and Certain Personality Traits: Understanding the Mediating Effect of Intrinsic Motivation , 2008 .

[8]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[9]  K. Clark Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development , 1989 .

[10]  Simon Szykman,et al.  A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts , 2002 .

[11]  Barry L. Lewis,et al.  Determinants of Auditor Expertise , 1990 .

[12]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[13]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in Design: an overview , 2004 .

[14]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Expertise in engineering design , 1998 .

[15]  J. Dixon,et al.  Engineering Design , 2019, Springer Handbook of Mechanical Engineering.

[16]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .

[17]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Towards a decision-support framework for the embodiment phase of mechanical design , 1992, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[18]  Kurt A. Heppard,et al.  An empirical test of environmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incremental and radical innovation , 2003 .

[19]  Rüdiger Klein,et al.  Knowledge Modeling In Design - The MOKA Framework , 2000, AID.

[20]  Gregory J. Feist Handbook of Creativity: The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity , 1998 .

[21]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Formalising Design Exploration as Co-Evolution , 1996 .

[23]  W. James Potter,et al.  Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis , 1999 .

[24]  T. Amabile,et al.  The conditions of creativity. , 1988 .

[25]  Ken M. Wallace,et al.  The introduction of a design heuristics extraction method , 2002, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[26]  John C. Thomas,et al.  The psychological study of design , 1979 .

[27]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  A comparison of designer activity using core design situations in the laboratory and practice , 2013 .

[28]  David A. Waldman,et al.  THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT TO A THEORY OF WORK PERFORMANCE , 1994 .

[29]  M. J. French Engineering design: The conceptual stage , 1971 .

[30]  Susan M. Land,et al.  A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions , 2004 .

[31]  M. Batey Creativity, Intelligence and Personality , 2012 .

[32]  Alex H. B. Duffy,et al.  Modelling design development performance , 2002 .

[33]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[34]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[35]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  Discovering the design problem , 1994 .

[36]  John S. Gero,et al.  The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: a case study on novice and expert designers , 2002 .

[37]  J. A. Lepine,et al.  Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity , 1998 .

[39]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[40]  T. M. Amabile Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. , 1982 .

[41]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Towards an ‘ideal’ approach for concept generation , 2003 .

[42]  Wolfgang Beitz,et al.  Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach , 1984 .

[43]  Kirpal Singh,et al.  Creativity Across Cultures , 2007 .

[44]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  The Innovation Algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity , 1999 .

[45]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  The measurement of creativity. , 1994 .

[46]  Marine Agogué,et al.  The impacts of examples on creative design : explaining fixation and stimulation effects , 2014 .

[47]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[48]  Robert W. Lissitz,et al.  A Methodological Study of the Torrance Tests of Creativity: Can Creativity Be Faked? Measurement and Statistics. , 1982 .

[49]  Tua Björklund,et al.  Initial mental representations of design problems: Differences between experts and novices , 2013 .

[50]  H. J. Eysenck IQ, Social Class and Educational Policy , 2012 .

[51]  Linda Candy,et al.  Supporting the creative user: a criteria-based approach to interaction design , 1997 .

[52]  Imre Horváth,et al.  A treatise on order in engineering design research , 2004 .

[53]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[54]  G. Stewart A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[55]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design , 1994 .

[56]  Erik Kaestner,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 2016 .

[57]  Nigel Cross,et al.  The problem of design problems , 2003 .

[58]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  A Model of Co-evolutionary Design , 2000, Engineering with Computers.

[59]  K. Holyoak Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. , 1991 .

[60]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  A MEASURE FOR ASSESSING PRODUCT NOVELTY , 2003 .

[61]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creative thinking by expert designers , 2004 .

[62]  F. Gobet,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance , 2006 .

[63]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements , 2000 .

[64]  Linda Jarvin,et al.  Explorations in Giftedness , 2010 .

[65]  Willemien Visser,et al.  The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing , 2006 .

[66]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part I: Descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes , 1989 .

[67]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  Experimental observation of iteration in engineering design , 1998 .

[68]  T. Lubart Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[69]  F. Barron,et al.  Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality , 2003 .

[70]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[71]  Elena L. Grigorenko,et al.  Creativity: From potential to realization. , 2004 .

[72]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Representation in design: data from engineering journals , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[73]  G. D. Taylor,et al.  Design determines 70% of cost? A review of implications for design evaluation , 2001 .

[74]  Yasemin Afacan,et al.  Assessing creativity in design education: Analysis of creativity factors in the first-year design studio , 2012 .

[75]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  INFORMATION AS AN INPUT INTO THE CREATIVE PROCESS , 2006 .

[76]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Formal Engineering Design Synthesis , 2005 .

[77]  Sven Matthiesen,et al.  SEVEN YEARS OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN INDUSTRY – EXPERIENCES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR SUPPORTING ENGINEERING DESIGN WITH ‘THINKING TOOLS’ , 2011 .

[78]  M. Kirton,et al.  The Adaption-Innovation Continuum, Occupational Type, and Course Selection , 1982 .

[79]  Chun-Heng Ho,et al.  Some phenomena of problem decomposition strategy for design thinking: differences between novices and experts , 2001 .

[80]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Design change and complexity , 2005 .

[81]  Belinda López-Mesa,et al.  NOVELTY METRICS IN ENGINEERING DESIGN EXPERIMENTS , 2006 .

[82]  Henri Christiaans,et al.  Creativity in Design Engineering and the Role of Knowledge: Modelling the Expert , 2005 .

[83]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[84]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[85]  Elies Dekoninck,et al.  The appearance of creative behavior in later stage design processes , 2014 .

[86]  Graham Thompson,et al.  A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design , 1999 .

[87]  J. Keith Nisbett,et al.  Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design , 1983 .

[88]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  Change as little as possible: creativity in design by modification , 2012 .

[89]  John S. Gero,et al.  Strategic knowledge differences between an expert and a novice designer , 2001 .

[90]  Robert Eisenberger,et al.  Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creativity: A Case Study of Conceptual and Methodological Isolation , 2003 .

[91]  J. P. Guilford,et al.  Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications , 1968 .

[92]  H. Thomas,et al.  A History of the World , 1979 .

[93]  Stephen Culley,et al.  Comparing the information content of formal and informal design documents: Lessons for more complete design records , 2009 .

[94]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Activity Theory: Basic Concepts and Applications , 1995, EWHCI.

[95]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views , 1994 .

[96]  L. Farrand THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. , 1897, Science.

[97]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Combining method engineering with activity theory: theoretical grounding of the method component concept , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[98]  R. Adler,et al.  Exploring the reliability of social and environmental disclosures content analysis , 1999 .

[99]  Larry Leifer,et al.  Understanding Idealogging: The Use and Perception of Logbooks within a Capstone Engineering Design Course , 2009 .

[100]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[101]  Saeed B. Niku Creative Design of Products and Systems , 2008 .

[102]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[103]  Raymonde Guindon,et al.  Designing the Design Process: Exploiting Opportunistic Thoughts , 1990, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[104]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Activity Theory and System Design: A View from the Trenches , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[105]  Ram D. Sriram,et al.  A system for generating process and material selection advice during embodiment design of mechanical components , 2003 .

[106]  Stephen Culley,et al.  Variation in Creative Behaviour During the Later Stages of the Design Process , 2012 .

[107]  Herbert Birkhofer,et al.  Imparting Design Methods With the Strategies of Experts , 2007 .

[108]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[109]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  The digital divide: Investigating the personal information management practices of engineers , 2011 .

[110]  C. Shalley,et al.  WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[111]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Effects of Productivity Goals, Creativity Goals, and Personal Discretion on Individual Creativity , 1991 .

[112]  Hans J. Thamhain,et al.  Building high performing engineering project teams , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[113]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  ANALYSING THE USE OF FOUR CREATIVITY TOOLS IN A CONSTRAINED DESIGN SITUATION , 2011 .

[114]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[115]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[116]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[117]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods , 2003 .

[118]  Vinod Goel,et al.  The Structure of Design Problem Spaces , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[119]  Tat Y. Lee,et al.  Design methods used by undergraduate engineering students , 1989 .

[120]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Does product design really determine 80% of manufacturing cost? Working Paper MSA 3601-93 , 2013 .

[121]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[122]  R. Beghetto,et al.  Why Creativity Is Domain General, Why It Looks Domain Specific, and Why the Distinction Does Not Matter. , 2004 .

[123]  Thomas G. Dietterich,et al.  A model of the mechanical design process based on empirical data , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[124]  Elies Dekoninck,et al.  Studying the appearance and effect of creativity within the the latter stages of the product development process , 2011, DESIRE.

[125]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  The Role of Specificity and Abstraction in Creative Idea Generation , 2004 .

[126]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design , 2013 .

[127]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  What is Creativity? Emergent Phenomena in Complex Adaptive Systems , 2020 .

[128]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  DEFINING AND SUPPORTING DESIGN CREATIVITY , 2006 .

[129]  Tim R. V. Davis,et al.  The Influence of the Physical Environment in Offices , 1984 .

[130]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Everyone has creative potential. , 2004 .

[131]  Timothy A. Post,et al.  Problem-Solving Skill in the Social Sciences , 1983 .

[132]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Modularity in design of products and systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[133]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Problem-solving Strategies and Expertise in Engineering Design. , 1997 .

[134]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and creativity. , 1998 .

[135]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  Attribute centrality and imaginative thought , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[136]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Creative system design methodologies: the case of complex technical systems , 2005 .

[137]  M. Maher Co-evolutionary Design of Structural Layouts : A Potentially Creative Solution ? , 2022 .

[138]  J. Glover,et al.  Handbook of creativity. , 1989 .

[139]  B Bender,et al.  ON THE SUPERIORITY OF OPPORTUNISTIC DESIGN STRATEGIES DURING EARLY EMBODIMENT DESIGN , 2004 .

[140]  Fumihiko Kimura,et al.  Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications , 2009 .

[141]  Ömer Akin,et al.  Frames of reference in architectural design: analysing the hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!) , 1996 .

[142]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[143]  Leonard Carmichael,et al.  Creativity and Its Cultivation , 1961 .

[144]  M. Kirton,et al.  Have Adaptors and Innovators Equal Levels of Creativity? , 1978 .

[145]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[146]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence , 1962 .

[147]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Evolution of Commitments in the Design of a Component , 1992 .

[148]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Structured and opportunistic processing in design: a critical discussion , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[149]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes , 2006 .

[150]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[151]  A. Cardoso,et al.  Assessing Creativity : The importance of unexpected novelty , 2022 .

[152]  T. Lubart Handbook of Creativity: Creativity Across Cultures , 1998 .

[153]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[154]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[155]  D. Scaravetti,et al.  Exploring design spaces in the search for embodiment design solutions and decision support , 2006, The Proceedings of the Multiconference on "Computational Engineering in Systems Applications".

[156]  T. Jong Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought , 2010 .

[157]  M. Boden The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[158]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  Adaption—innovation and creativity: A replication and extension , 1987 .

[159]  K. Klenke,et al.  Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership , 2016 .

[160]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  What works at work : overview and assessment , 1996 .

[161]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Road To Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games , 1996 .

[162]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[163]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle , 1989 .

[164]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[165]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence , 1962 .

[166]  Joseph S. Renzulli,et al.  Conceptions of Giftedness: The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A Developmental Model for Promoting Creative Productivity , 2005 .

[167]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[168]  J. Gero,et al.  DESIGN AND CHANGE: A MODEL OF SITUATED CREATIVITY , 2003, IJCAI 2003.

[169]  R. Helson,et al.  Creative potential, creative achievement, and personal growth. , 2000, Journal of personality.

[170]  Victor V. Kryssanov,et al.  Understanding design fundamentals: how synthesis and analysis drive creativity, resulting in emergence , 2001, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[171]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Genius, creativity, and leadership , 1984 .

[172]  James E. Birren,et al.  The Gifted Group at Mid-Life , 1960 .

[173]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[174]  Stephen Culley,et al.  IMPROVING CONFIDENCE IN SMALLER DATA SETS THROUGH METHODOLOGY: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A CODING SCHEME , 2012 .

[175]  David Knott,et al.  The Place of TRIZ in a Holistic Design Methodology , 2001 .

[176]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  DRM, a Design Research Methodology , 2009 .

[177]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The Integration of Systems Levels and Design Activities to Position Creativity Support Tools , 2009 .

[178]  Balder Onarheim,et al.  Opening and constraining: constraints and their role in creative processes , 2010, DESIRE.

[179]  John S. Gero,et al.  Conceptual designing as a sequence of situated acts , 1998, AI in Structural Engineering.

[180]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Exploring problem decomposition in conceptual design among novice designers , 2009 .

[181]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Change and customisation in complex engineering domains , 2004 .

[182]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[183]  Shawn Okuda Sakamoto,et al.  Handbook of Creativity: Experimental Studies of Creativity , 1998 .

[184]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  Co-evolution and emergence in design , 1997, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[185]  R. Eisentraut,et al.  Individual styles of problem solving and their relation to representations in the design process , 1997 .

[186]  Willemien Visser,et al.  More or Less Following a Plan During Design: Opportunistic Deviations in Specification , 1990, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[187]  T. Lubart,et al.  Emotion, Metaphor, and the Creative Process , 1997 .

[188]  D. Simonton Origins of genius : Darwinian perspectives on creativity , 1999 .

[189]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Design Problems and Design Paradoxes , 2006, Design Issues.

[190]  J. Gero Computational Models of Innovative and Creative Design Processes , 2000 .

[191]  John S. Gero,et al.  The differences between retrospective and concurrent protocols in revealing the process-oriented aspects of the design process , 2001 .

[192]  Janetta Mitchell McCoy,et al.  The Potential Role of the Physical Environment in Fostering Creativity , 2002 .

[193]  A. Cropley In Praise of Convergent Thinking , 2006 .

[194]  Willemien Visser,et al.  Organisation of Design Activities: Opportunistic, with Hierarchical Episodes , 1994, Interact. Comput..

[195]  Axel Brinkop,et al.  Routine Design for Mechanical Engineering , 1995, AI Mag..

[196]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[197]  P. D. Stokes Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough , 2005 .

[198]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[199]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[200]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[201]  Ann Heylighen,et al.  Design in Mind , 2009, Design Issues.

[202]  William J. Kolarik,et al.  Creating quality : concepts, systems, strategies, and tools , 1995 .

[203]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation , 2000, TCHI.

[204]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation , 2011 .

[205]  M. Kirton Adaptors and Innovators: A Description and Measure. , 1976 .

[206]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  The elusive act of synthesis: creativity in the conceptual design of complex engineering products , 2009, C&C '09.

[207]  David C. Brown,et al.  Creativity, Surprise & Design: An Introduction and Investigation , 2012 .

[208]  Laurent Granvilliers,et al.  Search heuristics for constraint-aided embodiment design , 2009, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[209]  L. Mann,et al.  The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: aggregating across people and time , 2004 .

[210]  Nicholas Walliman,et al.  Social research methods , 2006 .

[211]  Chris Snider,et al.  A STUDY OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOUR IN THE EARLY AND LATE STAGE DESIGN PROCESS , 2014 .

[212]  Immj Isabelle Reymen,et al.  External designers in product design processes of small manufacturing firms , 2011 .

[213]  Aditya Johri,et al.  Exploration and exploitation in engineering design: Examining the effects of prior knowledge on creativity and ideation , 2009, 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.

[214]  J. Couger,et al.  Ensuring creative approaches in information system design , 1990 .

[215]  Steve Caplin,et al.  Principles Of Design , 2011 .

[216]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[217]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity , 2001 .

[218]  F. David Peat,et al.  Science, Order, and Creativity , 1987 .

[219]  Philip Samuel,et al.  TOWARD AN ADAPTION-INNOVATION STRATEGY FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN , 2011 .

[220]  Damien Motte,et al.  STUDY OF THE DESIGNER’S COGNITIVE PROCESSES DURING THE LATER PHASES OF THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS , 2004 .

[221]  NguyenLemai,et al.  A framework for understanding creativity in requirements engineering , 2009 .

[222]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Investing in Creativity. , 1996 .

[223]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[224]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Mechanical Engineering Design Complexity Metrics: Size, Coupling, and Solvability , 2010 .

[225]  Janice R. Kelly,et al.  Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. , 1985 .

[226]  Ashok K. Goel Design, Analogy, and Creativity , 1997, IEEE Expert.

[227]  T. B. Ward Structured Imagination: the Role of Category Structure in Exemplar Generation , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[228]  R. Crutchfield,et al.  Mathematicians: the creative researcher and the average PhD. , 1970, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[229]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[230]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[231]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Representation of functions and features in detail design , 1996, Comput. Aided Des..

[232]  Chris Bilton,et al.  Management and Creativity: From Creative Industries to Creative Management , 2006 .

[233]  Patricia D. Stokes,et al.  Using constraints to create novelty: A case study. , 2009 .

[234]  Colleen M. Seifert,et al.  Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design , 2011 .

[235]  Yoshimasa A. Ono How I created the theory of relativity , 1982 .

[236]  Kyung H Kim Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT) , 2006 .

[237]  Ben J Hicks,et al.  An investigation into the use and content of the engineer's logbook , 2006 .

[238]  P. Adler,et al.  The Role of Affect in Creative Projects and Exploratory Search , 2007 .

[239]  D. Garvin Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality , 1987 .

[240]  John Robert Dixon Design Engineering: Inventiveness, Analysis, and Decision Making , 1966 .

[241]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[242]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[243]  Scott G. Isaksen,et al.  Adaption-Innovation and the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: The Level-Style Issue Revisited , 1988 .

[244]  David F. Redmiles,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on Activity Theory and the Practice of Design , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[245]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Children's Artistic Creativity , 1982 .

[246]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[247]  John S. Gero,et al.  Creativity, emergence and evolution in design , 1996, Knowl. Based Syst..

[248]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A framework for understanding creativity in requirements engineering , 2009, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[249]  Stephen Culley,et al.  Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process , 2013 .

[250]  Fehm Smulders,et al.  Modelling co-evolution in design practice , 2009 .

[251]  Gerd Fricke,et al.  Successful individual approaches in engineering design , 1996 .

[252]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[253]  Wolter J. Fabrycky,et al.  Systems engineering and analysis , 1981 .

[254]  George F. Farris,et al.  Time Pressure and Performance of Scientists and Engineers; A Five-Year Panel Study , 2015 .

[255]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  IDEA GENERATION IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN , 2008 .

[256]  David C. Brown ROUTINENESS REVISITED , 2022 .

[257]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers' Creativity , 2005 .

[258]  Joan P. Avis Counseling , 1982 .

[259]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[260]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function - Behaviour - Structure Framework , 2002, AID.

[261]  Ronald A. Finke,et al.  Creative Imagery: Discoveries and inventions in Visualization , 1990 .

[262]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  On theory-driven design and deployment of collaboration systems , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[263]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity , 1993 .

[264]  M. Chi Two Approaches to the Study of Experts' Characteristics , 2006 .

[265]  Lucienne Blessing,et al.  Understanding the differences between how novice and experienced designers approach design tasks , 2003 .

[266]  Pirita Seitamaa-Hakkarainen,et al.  Composition and construction in experts' and novices' weaving design , 2001 .

[267]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[268]  Min Basadur,et al.  Using the Creative Problem Solving Profile (CPSP) for Diagnosing and Solving Real-World Problems , 2003 .

[269]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation , 2010 .

[270]  Stephen Culley,et al.  Determining Relative Quality for the Study of Creative Design Output , 2013 .

[271]  R. Burchfield Oxford English dictionary , 1982 .

[272]  J. Hayes Cognitive Processes in Creativity , 1989 .

[273]  T. R. Davis,et al.  The influence of the physical environment in offices. , 1985, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[274]  Robert Bjärnemo,et al.  The cognitive aspects of the engineering design activity – A literature survey , 2004 .

[275]  Robert Bjärnemo,et al.  A DESCRIPTIVE MODEL OF THE DESIGNER'S PROBLEM-SOLVING ACTIVITY DURING THE LATER PHASES OF THE MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS , 2011 .

[276]  J. Guilford The structure of intellect. , 1956, Psychological bulletin.

[277]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[278]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Planning , 1979, Cogn. Sci..

[279]  Terri Gullickson The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. , 1995 .