Receptive Field Organization Determines Pyramidal Cell Stimulus-Encoding Capability and Spatial Stimulus Selectivity

Sensory systems must operate over a wide range of spatial scales, and single neuron receptive field (RF) organization may contribute to the ability of a neuron to encode information about stimuli having different spatial characteristics. Here we relate the RF organization of sensory neurons to their ability to encode time-varying stimuli, using linear stimulus estimation, measures of information transfer, and more conventional analysis techniques. The electrosensory systems of weakly electric fish are recognized as very tractable model systems for studies of sensory processing because behaviorally relevant stimuli are generated easily and related to known behaviors and because a detailed anatomical database is available to guide the design and interpretation of experiments. Receptive fields of neurons within the first central electrosensory-processing region have an antagonistic center–surround organization; the RF area varies with cell type, with dendritic morphology, and with the spontaneous activity patterns of the cell. Functional consequences of variations in center–surround organization were assessed by comparing responses to two spatial stimulus patterns that mimic naturalistic stimuli and that provide input to the center alone or to the center plus surround. Measures of the quality of stimulus estimation (coding fraction) and information transmission (mutual information) as well as traditional measures of responsiveness consistently demonstrate that, for cells having large surrounds, the activation of both receptive field components degrades the ability to encode time-varying stimuli. The loss of coding efficiency with center–surround stimulation probably results from cancellation of balanced excitatory and inhibitory inputs. However, cells with small surrounds relative to centers perform well under all spatial stimulus regimes.

[1]  F Gabbiani,et al.  Feature Extraction by Burst-Like Spike Patterns in Multiple Sensory Maps , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Joseph Bastian,et al.  Gain control in the electrosensory system: a role for the descending projections to the electrosensory lateral line lobe , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[3]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Joseph Bastian,et al.  Vision and electroreception: Integration of sensory information in the optic tectum of the weakly electric fishApteronotus albifrons , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[5]  Peter Dayan,et al.  The Effect of Correlated Variability on the Accuracy of a Population Code , 1999, Neural Computation.

[6]  L. Maler,et al.  Neural architecture of the electrosensory lateral line lobe: adaptations for coincidence detection, a sensory searchlight and frequency-dependent adaptive filtering , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  L. Maler,et al.  The posterior lateral line lobe of certain gymnotoid fish: Quantitative light microscopy , 1979, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  C A Shumway,et al.  Multiple electrosensory maps in the medulla of weakly electric gymnotiform fish. I. Physiological differences , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  Fabrizio Gabbiani,et al.  Principles of spike train analysis , 1996 .

[10]  L Maler,et al.  The nucleus praeeminentialis: A Golgi study of a feedback center in the electrosensory system of gymnotid fish , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  J Bastian Plasticity in an electrosensory system. II. Postsynaptic events associated with a dynamic sensory filter. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The electric organ discharges of the gymnotiform fishes: I. Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 1996, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[13]  Leonard Maler,et al.  The organization of afferent input to the caudal lobe of the cerebellum of the gymnotid fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[14]  V. Haskovec [Physiology and morphology]. , 1961, Casopis lekaru ceskych.

[15]  Alexander Borst,et al.  Information theory and neural coding , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Bastian,et al.  Dendritic modulation of burst-like firing in sensory neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  W Heiligenberg,et al.  Ultrastructural studies of physiologically identified electrosensory afferent synapses in the gymnotiform fish, Eigenmannia , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  C. Koch,et al.  Coding of time-varying electric field amplitude modulations in a wave-type electric fish. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  B. Rasnow,et al.  The electric organ discharges of the gymnotiform fishes: II. Eigenmannia , 1998, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Labelling of electroreceptive afferents in a gymnotoid fish by intracellular injection of HRP: The mystery of multiple maps , 1982, Journal of comparative physiology.

[21]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[22]  Joseph Bastian,et al.  The physiology and morphology of two types of electrosensory neurons in the weakly electric fishApteronotus leptorhynchus , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  J Bastian,et al.  Plasticity in an electrosensory system. I. General features of a dynamic sensory filter. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  J. E. Lewis,et al.  Neuronal Population Codes and the Perception of Object Distance in Weakly Electric Fish , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Fabrizio Gabbiani,et al.  Coding of time-varying signals in spike trains of linear and half-wave rectifying neurons. , 1996, Network.

[26]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Neural Nets in Electric Fish , 1991 .

[27]  J. Bastian Electrolocation: I. How the electroreceptors ofApteronotus albifrons code for moving objects and other electrical stimuli , 1981 .

[28]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Prey-capture behavior in gymnotid electric fish: motion analysis and effects of water conductivity. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  Joseph Bastian,et al.  Morphological correlates of pyramidal cell adaptation rate in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of weakly electric fish , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[30]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden? , 1999, Neural Computation.

[31]  R Krahe,et al.  Robustness and variability of neuronal coding by amplitude-sensitive afferents in the weakly electric fish eigenmannia. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  J. Bastian Electrolocation: II. The effects of moving objects and other electrical stimuli on the activities of two categories of posterior lateral line lobe cells inApteronotus albifrons , 1981 .

[33]  Gabbiani,et al.  Encoding and processing of sensory information in neuronal spike trains , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[34]  J. Bastian Gain control in the electrosensory system mediated by descending inputs to the electrosensory lateral line lobe , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[35]  C A Shumway,et al.  Multiple electrosensory maps in the medulla of weakly electric gymnotiform fish. II. Anatomical differences , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  L. Maler,et al.  The cytology of the posterior lateral line lobe of high‐frequency weakly electric fish (gymnotidae): Dendritic differentiation and synaptic specificity in a simple cortex , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  B. Heller Circular Statistics in Biology, Edward Batschelet. Academic Press, London & New York (1981), 371, Price $69.50 , 1983 .

[38]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Prey capture in the weakly electric fish Apteronotus albifrons: sensory acquisition strategies and electrosensory consequences. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[39]  L. Maler,et al.  Correlating gamma‐aminobutyric acidergic circuits and sensory function in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of a gymnotiform fish , 1994, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[40]  K. Frank,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – MICROELECTRODES FOR RECORDING AND STIMULATION , 1964 .

[41]  Leonard Maler,et al.  GABAergic inhibition shapes temporal and spatial response properties of pyramidal cells in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of gymnotiform fish , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[42]  J. Juranek,et al.  A sensory brain map for each behavior? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  R. H. Hamstra,et al.  Coding properties of two classes of afferent nerve fibers: high-frequency electroreceptors in the electric fish, Eigenmannia. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  C. Koch,et al.  From stimulus encoding to feature extraction in weakly electric fish , 1996, Nature.

[45]  J. Bastian,et al.  Plasticity of feedback inputs in the apteronotid electrosensory system. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.