The potential clinical and economic outcomes of pharmacogenomic approaches to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES Pharmacogenomic applications in oncology offer significant promise, but the clinical and economic implications remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential cost-utility of implementing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) testing before initiating second-line therapy for advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS We developed a decision analytic model to evaluate the cost-utility of EGFR protein expression or gene copy number testing compared to standard care with erlotinib in refractory advanced NSCLC patients. Costs and utilities were obtained from publicly available sources. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate uncertainty in the results. RESULTS The quality-adjusted life expectancies for erlotinib, EGFR protein expression testing, and gene copy number testing were: 0.44, 0.48, and 0.50 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); and the costs were: $57,238, $63,512, and $66,447, respectively. The most cost-effective testing option, EGFR gene copy number testing, produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $162,018/QALY compared to no testing (erlotinib). The results were most sensitive to the survival estimates, health state utilities, and cost of disease progression. In the probabilistic sensitivity analyses, erlotinib without testing was the optimal treatment strategy until the $150,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold, after which gene copy testing was optimal. The discounted expected value of perfect information at a $100,000/QALY threshold in the USA over 5 years was $31.4 million. CONCLUSIONS The study results suggest that EGFR pharmacogenomic testing has the potential to improve quality-adjusted life expectancy in the treatment of refractory NSCLC by a clinically meaningful margin at a value commensurate with the approved therapies in this setting. Additional research in this area is warranted.

[1]  J. Lester,et al.  Erlotinib prescribing for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): The effect of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Technology Appraisal 162 (TA162) , 2010 .

[2]  A. Wertheimer,et al.  The economic burden. , 2010, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[3]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  Comparative clinical and economic outcomes of treatments for refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). , 2008, Lung cancer.

[4]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Second-line and third-line chemotherapy for lung cancer: use and cost. , 2008, The American journal of managed care.

[5]  S. Mani UGT1A1 polymorphism predicts irinotecan toxicity: Evolving proof , 2001, AAPS PharmSci.

[6]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of erlotinib vs. docetaxel or pemetrexed in the treatment of refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , 2007 .

[7]  P. Jänne,et al.  Prospective study of gefitinib in epidermal growth factor receptor fluorescence in situ hybridization-positive/phospho-Akt-positive or never smoker patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the ONCOBELL trial. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  F. Cappuzzo,et al.  EGFR and HER2 Gene Copy Number and Response to First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) , 2007, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[9]  T. Mitsudomi,et al.  Which biomarker predicts benefit from EGFR-TKI treatment for patients with lung cancer? , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  F. Hirsch,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number and protein level are not associated with outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[11]  F. Cappuzzo,et al.  Combination of EGFR gene copy number and protein expression predicts outcome for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  L. Tanoue,et al.  Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2007 .

[13]  H. Lenz,et al.  EGFR, HER2 and VEGF pathways: validated targets for cancer treatment. , 2007, Drugs.

[14]  M. Vijver,et al.  clairvoyance or reliable prediction of the future , 2006 .

[15]  P. Postmus,et al.  CN3 PHARMACOECONOMIC (PE) ANALYSIS OF THE TREATMENT OF NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) IN THE NETHERLANDS DEMONSTRATES THAT ERLOTINIB DOMINATES DOCETAXEL AND IS COST-EFFECTIVE OVER BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE (BSC) WITHOUT NEED FOR PATIENT STRATIFICATION , 2006 .

[16]  M. Tabberer,et al.  PCN74 UTILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC): A COMMUNITY STUDY , 2006 .

[17]  B. Nafees,et al.  PCN69 HEALTH UTILITIES IN THE UK FOR SECOND LINE ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) FOLLOWING PRIOR CHEMOTHERAPY , 2006 .

[18]  V. Kaklamani,et al.  A genetic signature can predict prognosis and response to therapy in breast cancer: Oncotype DX , 2006, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[19]  F. Hirsch,et al.  Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib in a phase III placebo-controlled study in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  L. Seymour,et al.  Clinical Utility of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression for Selecting Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer for Treatment with Erlotinib , 2006, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[21]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation , 2006 .

[22]  S. Mukherjee,et al.  A genomic strategy to refine prognosis in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Evaluation of erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: impact on the budget of a U.S. health insurance plan. , 2006, Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP.

[25]  E. Tokunaga,et al.  Trastuzumab and breast cancer: developments and current status , 2006, International Journal of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  E. Felip,et al.  Treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer and pharmacogenomics: where we are and where we are going , 2006, Current opinion in oncology.

[27]  Zhong Wen-zhao,et al.  Erlotinib in Lung Cancer - Molecular and Clinical Predictors of Outcome , 2006 .

[28]  F. Ciardiello,et al.  Cetuximab in the treatment of colorectal cancer. , 2005, Future oncology.

[29]  H. Nakamura,et al.  Survival impact of epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis , 2005, Thorax.

[30]  Lee Bowman,et al.  The economic burden of lung cancer and the associated costs of treatment failure in the United States. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[31]  F. Hirsch,et al.  Increased epidermal growth factor receptor gene copy number detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization associates with increased sensitivity to gefitinib in patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma subtypes: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  M. Berger,et al.  Biomarkers to Predict Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors , 2005, Cell cycle.

[33]  Elisa Rossi,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor gene and protein and gefitinib sensitivity in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  F. Hirsch,et al.  Biomarkers for prediction of sensitivity to EGFR inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer , 2005, Current opinion in oncology.

[35]  H. McLeod,et al.  Pharmacogenetic influences on treatment response and toxicity in colorectal cancer. , 2005, Seminars in oncology.

[36]  Miklos Pless,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  W. Evans,et al.  Pharmacogenetics as a Molecular Basis for Individualized Drug Therapy: The Thiopurine S-methyltransferase Paradigm , 1999, Pharmaceutical Research.

[38]  Chan Zeng,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  Stephen Mackinnon,et al.  Imatinib mesylate--the new gold standard for treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  M Paesmans,et al.  The role of EGF-R expression on patient survival in lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis , 2002, European Respiratory Journal.

[41]  Y. Yarden,et al.  Untangling the ErbB signalling network , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[42]  A. Adjei Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy , 2001 .

[43]  M. Kris,et al.  Randomized Phase III Trial of Docetaxel Versus Vinorelbine or Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy Regimens , 2000 .

[44]  J. Dancey,et al.  Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  M. Kris,et al.  Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  M. Mcgrath Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. , 1998 .

[47]  S. Cantor,et al.  Costs of blood transfusion: a process-flow analysis. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  C. Somkin,et al.  Cost of Care for Cancer in a Health Maintenance Organization , 1997, Health care financing review.

[49]  D. Davies,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Investigation of catalytic mechanism, structure-based searching and discovery of a potent inhibitor. , 1994, Biochemical pharmacology.

[50]  W. McGuire,et al.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. , 1987, Science.

[51]  S. Cohen,et al.  Epidermal growth factor , 1972, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[52]  F. Henry,et al.  Cost effectiveness. , 1980, The Ohio State medical journal.

[53]  R. Amyot [Health insurance plan]. , 1951, L'union medicale du Canada.