Patients' perceptions of their medical records from different subject positions

Better knowledge of the habits and preferences of patients helps one understand why and how patients might need or want to access health services online and offline. Such knowledge provides a basis for designing systems for providing complementary health information. This article discusses how patients' conceptualizations of their health‐information‐related preferences, motivations, and needs are linked to the perceived role of medical records as an informational artifact. We identified seven subject positions: (P1) Hypothetically positive to e‐health services generally, (P2) Positive to reading medical records due to implications, (P3) Positive to all Internet use including medical records online, (P4) Distrustful and wants to be in control of health treatment, (P5) Worried about health, (P6) Wants communication with health care professionals, and (P7) Do not understand their medical record. These subject positions can explain the worry and enthusiasm documented in earlier literature. The diversity of subject positions implies that health care information services should be planned with different subject positions in mind rather than a simple demographic group. Special attention needs to be given to finding flexible solutions that address the opportunities and worries of the identified subject positions.

[1]  Chen-Tan Lin,et al.  Review Paper: The Effects of Promoting Patient Access to Medical Records: A Review , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  C. Pyper,et al.  Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. , 2004, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[3]  A. Arcangeli.  The Medical Discourse , 2003 .

[4]  Chen-Tan Lin,et al.  Expectations of Patients and Physicians Regarding Patient-Accessible Medical Records , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Ana Silva,et al.  Why facilitate patient access to medical records. , 2007, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[6]  Pamela J. McKenzie,et al.  Preparing for opening night: temporal boundary objects in textually-mediated professional practice , 2004, Inf. Res..

[7]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  M Michael,et al.  Do patients want access to their medical records? , 1982, Medical care.

[9]  Maria Kvist,et al.  Lättillgängliga journaler – rättighet med problem? , 2011 .

[10]  A. Langley,et al.  Leadership as boundary work in healthcare teams , 2013 .

[11]  Alla Keselman,et al.  Text Characteristics of Clinical Reports and Their Implications for the Readability of Personal Health Records , 2007, MedInfo.

[12]  Kimmo Tuominen,et al.  Tiedon muodostus ja virtuaalikirjaston rakentaminen: konstruktionistinen analyysi , 2001 .

[13]  Eric S Holmboe,et al.  Patients, providers, and systems need to acquire a specific set of competencies to achieve truly patient-centered care. , 2013, Health affairs.

[14]  Marius Fieschi,et al.  WRAPIN : a Tool for Patient Empowerment within EHR , 2007, MedInfo.

[15]  Jonathan Potter,et al.  Discourse analysis and constructionist approaches: theoretical background , 1996 .

[16]  Claudia Pagliari,et al.  Potential of electronic personal health records , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  Jane Ogden,et al.  What's in a name? An experimental study of patients' views of the impact and function of a diagnosis. , 2003, Family practice.

[18]  Terhilda Garrido,et al.  Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. , 2007, The American journal of managed care.

[19]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  The struggle to redefine boundaries in health care systems , 1999 .

[20]  Luk Van Langenhove,et al.  Positioning theory : moral contexts of intentional action , 1999 .

[21]  Elizabeth Manafò,et al.  Assessing the eHealth Literacy Skills of Older Adults: A Preliminary Study , 2012 .

[22]  Fred H. Cate,et al.  The Right to Privacy and the Public's Right to Know: The "Central Purpose" of the Freedom of Information Act , 1994 .

[23]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: A Quasi-experimental Study and a Look Ahead , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[24]  Astrid Mager.  Health information politics: Reconsidering the democratic ideal of the Web as a source of medical knowledge , 2012, First Monday.

[25]  Miriam Lips,et al.  Digital government , 2020, Government at a Glance: Western Balkans.

[26]  H. M. Evans.  Medical humanities: stranger at the gate, or long-lost friend? , 2007, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[27]  Kumanan Wilson,et al.  The challenges in making electronic health records accessible to patients , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[28]  J. Hibbard,et al.  What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. , 2013, Health affairs.

[29]  Alexander Hörbst,et al.  Attitudes and behaviors related to the introduction of electronic health records among Austrian and German citizens , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[30]  Thomas Winman,et al.  Electronic Patient Records in Interprofessional Decision Making: Standardized Categories and Local Use , 2012 .

[31]  B. Davies,et al.  Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves , 1990 .

[32]  Madhu C. Reddy,et al.  Multiple Perspectives: Evaluating Healthcare Information Systems in Collaborative Environments , 2005 .

[33]  S. Wyatt,et al.  'Ignorance is bliss sometimes': constraints on the emergence of the 'informed patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[34]  Lenka Lhotská,et al.  Obstetric Medical Record Processing and Information Retrieval , 2011, eHealth.

[35]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Interacting with Information , 1995, DSV-IS.

[36]  R. Nease,et al.  Choice architecture is a better strategy than engaging patients to spur behavior change. , 2013, Health affairs.

[37]  Recording of clinical information in a Scotland-wide drug deaths study , 2010, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[38]  William J. Meyer,et al.  The Enigma of Health: The Art of Healing in a Scientific Age , 1996, Nature Medicine.

[39]  Susan Leigh Star.  Ceci n'est pas un objet-frontière !: Réflexions sur l'origine d'un concept , 2010 .

[40]  Samina Munir,et al.  Patient Empowerment and the Electronic Health Record , 2001, MedInfo.

[41]  Fraser Macfarlane,et al.  Re-Organizing Work Roles in Health Care: Evidence from the Implementation of Functional Flexibility , 2006 .

[42]  I. Jolliffe.  Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[43]  Chen-Tan Lin,et al.  Research Paper: Use of a Patient-Accessible Electronic Medical Record in a Practice for Congestive Heart Failure: Patient and Physician Experiences , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[44]  J. Sweeney,et al.  Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. , 2013, Health affairs.

[45]  J. Alexander,et al.  Organizational Boundary Spanning in Institutionalized Environments , 1987 .

[46]  Julie McLeod.  Managing Records as Evidence and Information , 2002, J. Documentation.

[47]  R. Rudd,et al.  Health and Literacy: A Review of Medical and Public Health Literature , 1999 .

[48]  Dean F. Sittig.  Personal health records on the internet: a snapshot of the pioneers at the end of the 20th Century , 2002, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[49]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  The Impact of Electronic Patient Portals on Patient Care: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[50]  Stephen J Langel.  Pioneering new ways to engage the disabled. , 2013, Health affairs.

[51]  David M. Brock,et al.  Restructuring the Professional Organization: Accounting, Health Care and Law , 1999 .

[52]  C. Heckler.  A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS™ System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling , 1996 .

[53]  Graham P. Martin,et al.  Team Work in Context: Institutional Mediation in the Public-service Professional Bureaucracy , 2010 .

[54]  C. Aydin,et al.  Evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems , 2005 .

[55]  Ágústa Pálsdóttir.  Health and lifestyle : Icelanders' everyday life information behaviour , 2005 .

[56]  David Finnegan,et al.  Integrating Healthcare with Information and Communications Technology , 2009 .

[57]  Kimmo Tuominen,et al.  Multiperspective digital libraries: The implications of constructionism for the development of digital libraries , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[58]  Gail Graham,et al.  Evaluating Patient Access to Electronic Health Records: Results From a Survey of Veterans , 2013, Medical care.

[59]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[60]  Claudia Pagliari,et al.  Embedding online patient record access in UK primary care: a survey of stakeholder experiences , 2012, JRSM short reports.

[61]  Torunn Wibe,et al.  Lay people's experiences with reading their medical record. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[62]  Todd Wareham,et al.  Privacy Advisors for Personal Information Management , 2006 .

[63]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients' 'scores'. , 2013, Health affairs.

[64]  Gunilla Widén-wulff,et al.  Information Mastering, Perceived Health and Societal Status: An Empirical Study of the Finnish Population , 2008 .

[65]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Inviting Patients to Read Their Doctors' Notes: Patients and Doctors Look Ahead , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[66]  J. Fowles,et al.  Patients' interest in reading their medical record: relation with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and patients' approach to health care. , 2004, Archives of internal medicine.

[67]  Joann G. Elmore,et al.  Open Notes: Doctors and Patients Signing On , 2010, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[68]  B. Fisher,et al.  How patients use access to their full health records: a qualitative study of patients in general practice , 2009, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[69]  Christine Marton,et al.  A review of theoretical models of health information seeking on the web , 2012, J. Documentation.

[70]  David C Grossman,et al.  Adolescent access to online health services: perils and promise. , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[71]  Erik Taal,et al.  Giving rheumatology patients online home access to their electronic medical record (EMR): advantages, drawbacks and preconditions according to care providers , 2012, Rheumatology International.

[72]  Peter Davies,et al.  Should patients be able to control their own records? , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[73]  R. Mann,et al.  Standards in medical record keeping. , 2003, Clinical medicine.

[74]  Susan S Woods,et al.  Patient Experiences With Full Electronic Access to Health Records and Clinical Notes Through the My HealtheVet Personal Health Record Pilot: Qualitative Study , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[75]  W O Hackl,et al.  “Why the Hell Do We Need Electronic Health Records?” , 2010, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[76]  A. Antonovsky.  Unraveling the mystery of health: how people manage stress and stay well , 1987 .

[77]  Margot Lindsay.  Understanding Healthcare Information , 2010 .

[78]  T. Palen,et al.  Association of online patient access to clinicians and medical records with use of clinical services. , 2012, JAMA.

[79]  Paul C. Tang,et al.  Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[80]  Allen I. Huffcutt,et al.  A Review and Evaluation of Exploratory Factor Analysis Practices in Organizational Research , 2003 .

[81]  Eva Söderström,et al.  Patient Safety and Patient Privacy in Information Security from the Patient's view : A case study , 2010 .

[82]  J. Bowling,et al.  Emergency department record keeping and the potential for injury surveillance. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[83]  Marion J Ball,et al.  Personal health records: empowering consumers. , 2007, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[84]  M. Bisognano,et al.  Engaging patients and their loved ones in the ultimate conversation. , 2013, Health affairs.

[85]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Personal health records: a scoping review , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[86]  Femida Gwadry-Sridhar,et al.  Evaluation of a Web-Based Patient Portal for Chronic Disease Management , 2011, eHealth.

[87]  L Ridsdale,et al.  What do patients want and not want to see about themselves on the computer screen: a qualitative study. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[88]  Enid N. H. Montague,et al.  Technology-mediated information sharing between patients and clinicians in primary care encounters , 2014, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[89]  L E Bilston,et al.  Accuracy of medical and ambulance record restraint and crash data information for child occupants , 2008, Injury Prevention.

[90]  Maria Kvist,et al.  Professional Language in Swedish Radiology Reports - Characterization for Patient-Adapted Text Simplification , 2013 .

[91]  S Bloch,et al.  Can patients safely read their psychiatric records?: Implications of freedom of information legislation , 1994, The Medical journal of Australia.

[92]  Jeffrey T. Huber,et al.  Knowledge/Power Transforming the Social Landscape: The Case of the Consumer Health Information Movement , 2011, The Library Quarterly.

[93]  Brian Fisher,et al.  How patients use access to their electronic GP record--a quantitative study. , 2011, Family practice.

[94]  Margaret Wetherell,et al.  Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue , 1998 .

[95]  Marija Norvaisaite,et al.  Review of: Fisher, Karen E., Erdelez, Sandra, and McKechnie, Lynne E.F. Theories of information behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. 2005 , 2006, Inf. Res..