Design of a robust EMG sensing interface for pattern classification

Electromyographic (EMG) pattern classification has been widely investigated for neural control of external devices in order to assist with movements of patients with motor deficits. Classification performance deteriorates due to inevitable disturbances to the sensor interface, which significantly challenges the clinical value of this technique. This study aimed to design a sensor fault detection (SFD) module in the sensor interface to provide reliable EMG pattern classification. This module monitored the recorded signals from individual EMG electrodes and performed a self-recovery strategy to recover the classification performance when one or more sensors were disturbed. To evaluate this design, we applied synthetic disturbances to EMG signals collected from leg muscles of able-bodied subjects and a subject with a transfemoral amputation and compared the accuracies for classifying transitions between different locomotion modes with and without the SFD module. The results showed that the SFD module maintained classification performance when one signal was distorted and recovered about 20% of classification accuracy when four signals were distorted simultaneously. The method was simple to implement. Additionally, these outcomes were observed for all subjects, including the leg amputee, which implies the promise of the designed sensor interface for providing a reliable neural-machine interface for artificial legs.

[1]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[2]  Wenwei Yu,et al.  On-line Learning Based Electromyogram to Forearm Motion Classifier with Motor Skill Evaluation , 2000 .

[3]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  R.Fff. Weir,et al.  A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[5]  He Huang,et al.  A Strategy for Identifying Locomotion Modes Using Surface Electromyography , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  K.B. Englehart,et al.  Multiple Binary Classifications via Linear Discriminant Analysis for Improved Controllability of a Powered Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[7]  C. Grimbergen,et al.  Investigation into the origin of the noise of surface electrodes , 2002, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[8]  Max E Valentinuzzi,et al.  Robust EMG sensing system based on data fusion for myoelectric control of a robotic arm , 2009, Biomedical engineering online.

[9]  Levi J. Hargrove,et al.  A Comparison of Surface and Intramuscular Myoelectric Signal Classification , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  D Graupe,et al.  Multifunctional prosthesis and orthosis control via microcomputer identification of temporal pattern differences in single-site myoelectric signals. , 1982, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[11]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Decoding a new neural machine interface for control of artificial limbs. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  H. V. Trees Detection, Estimation, And Modulation Theory , 2001 .

[13]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  A human-assisting manipulator teleoperated by EMG signals and arm motions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[14]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  E. Pertuzon,et al.  Factors influencing quantified surface EMGs , 1979, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[16]  J. G. van Dijk,et al.  A convenient method to reduce crosstalk in surface EMG. Cobb Award-winning article, 2001. , 2001, Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee , 2004, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[18]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  S Micera,et al.  A hybrid approach to EMG pattern analysis for classification of arm movements using statistical and fuzzy techniques. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[20]  J. Basmajian Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .

[21]  B Hudgins,et al.  Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. , 2006, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[22]  T W Williams,et al.  Practical methods for controlling powered upper-extremity prostheses. , 1990, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[23]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Quantifying Pattern Recognition—Based Myoelectric Control of Multifunctional Transradial Prostheses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Zhu Han,et al.  Information theoretic framework of trust modeling and evaluation for ad hoc networks , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[25]  R. Buschbacher Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk , 2007 .

[26]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[27]  T. Kuiken Targeted reinnervation for improved prosthetic function. , 2006, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America.

[28]  H. Devries MUSCLES ALIVE-THEIR FUNCTIONS REVEALED BY ELECTROMYOGRAPHY , 1976 .

[29]  N. Hogan,et al.  Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[30]  Hugh Herr,et al.  Agonist-antagonist active knee prosthesis: a preliminary study in level-ground walking. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  E. Kaplan Muscles Alive. Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography. J. V. Basmajian. Baltimore, The Williams and Wilkins Co., 1962. $8.50 , 1962 .

[32]  B. Hudgins,et al.  The effect of electrode displacements on pattern recognition based myoelectric control , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[33]  T S Kuo,et al.  Real-time implementation of electromyogram pattern recognition as a control command of man-machine interface. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[34]  C. Disselhorst-Klug,et al.  Improvement of spatial resolution in surface-EMG: a theoretical and experimental comparison of different spatial filters , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  J.W. Sensinger,et al.  Adaptive Pattern Recognition of Myoelectric Signals: Exploration of Conceptual Framework and Practical Algorithms , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[36]  J. G. Dijk,et al.  A convenient method to reduce crosstalk in surface EMG , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Pornchai Phukpattaranont,et al.  A Novel Feature Extraction for Robust EMG Pattern Recognition , 2009, ArXiv.