Identification of a chemical process reactor using soft computing techniques

This paper discusses the application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) in the area of identification and control of nonlinear dynamical systems. Since chemical processes are getting more complex and complicated, the need of schemes that can improve process operations is highly demanded. ANNs are capable of learning from examples, perform non-linear mappings, and have a special capacity to approximate the dynamics of nonlinear systems in many applications. This paper describe the application of neural network for modeling reactor level, reactor pressure, reactor cooling water temperature, and reactor temperature problems in the Tennessee Eastman (TE) chemical process reactor. The potential of neural network technology in the process industries is great. Its ability to model process dynamics makes it powerful tool for modeling and control processes. A comparison between the applications of ANNs to model the TE plant is compared with other soft computing techniques like fuzzy logic (FL) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS).

[1]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  On the "Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks" , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[2]  Kenneth J. Hunt,et al.  Neural networks in process control , 1991 .

[3]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Artificial Neural Networks: A Tutorial , 1996, Computer.

[4]  Kurt Hornik,et al.  Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators , 1989, Neural Networks.

[5]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Dynamic optimization of the Tennessee Eastman process using the OptControlCentre , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[6]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Plantwide controlA review and a new design procedure ” , 2013 .

[7]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Self-optimizing control of a large-scale plant: The Tennessee Eastman process , 2001 .

[8]  N. Ricker Optimal steady-state operation of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[9]  Niels Kjølstad Poulsen,et al.  Neural Networks for Modelling and Control of Dynamic Systems: A Practitioner’s Handbook , 2000 .

[10]  Ian David Lockhart Bogle,et al.  Computers and Chemical Engineering , 2008 .

[11]  JayHyung Lee,et al.  Nonlinear modeling and state estimation for the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[12]  Mark A. Kramer,et al.  Improvement of the backpropagation algorithm for training neural networks , 1990 .

[13]  George W. Irwin,et al.  Neural network applications in control , 1995 .

[14]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.

[15]  Daniel Sbarbaro,et al.  Neural Networks for Nonlinear Internal Model Control , 1991 .

[16]  J. A. Roubos,et al.  Identification of MIMO systems by input-output TS fuzzy models , 1998, 1998 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems Proceedings. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence (Cat. No.98CH36228).

[17]  Dale E. Seborg,et al.  Nonlinear internal model control strategy for neural network models , 1992 .

[18]  J. Sjöberg Neural networks for modelling and control of dynamic systems: M. Nørgaard, O. Ravn, N. K. Poulsen and L. K. Hansen. Springer-Verlag, London Berlin Heidelberg, 2000, pp. xiv+246 , 2004 .

[19]  Stephen A. Billings,et al.  Non-linear system identification using neural networks , 1990 .

[20]  Abhijit S. Pandya,et al.  Neural networks for process control , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[22]  JayHyung Lee,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[23]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  M N Karim,et al.  Artificial neural networks in bioprocess state estimation. , 1992, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[25]  M. H. Loke,et al.  A combined Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton inversion method for the interpretation of apparent resistivity pseudosections , 1997 .