See you Online

Instant Messaging (IM) is becoming a mainstay for online one-to-one communication. Although IM is popularly described as a written version of informal speech, little empirical investigation of the linguistic nature of IM exists. Moreover, although gender issues are being addressed for one-to-many forms of computer-mediated communication, we have no comparable studies of IM. This article offers a linguistic profile of American college student IM conversations. In addition to analyzing conversational scaffolding and lexical issues, the article identifies gender divergences in IM usage. Some differences reflect commonly reported functional gender distinctions in face-to-face spoken conversation; other differences indicate gender-based attitudes toward the importance of language standards in speech and writing.

[1]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  Teenage Communication in the Instant Messaging Era , 2006, Computers, Phones, and the Internet.

[2]  Pia Pichler.  The handbook of language and gender , 2005, Language in Society.

[3]  Rich Ling,et al.  The Sociolinguistics of SMS: An Analysis of SMS Use by a Random Sample of Norwegians , 2005 .

[4]  B. Webber.  The Handbook of Discourse Analysis , 2005 .

[5]  M. Daane,et al.  The Nation's Report Card: Writing, 2002. , 2003 .

[6]  Anat Rachel Shimoni,et al.  Gender, genre, and writing style in formal written texts , 2003 .

[7]  J. Holmes,et al.  The handbook of language and gender , 2003 .

[8]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  Computer-mediated communication on the internet , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Instant messaging in teen life , 2002, CSCW '02.

[10]  Shlomo Argamon,et al.  Automatically Categorizing Written Texts by Author Gender , 2002, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[11]  Steve Jones.  The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future with Today's Technology. , 2002 .

[12]  Jean Aitchison,et al.  Language and the Internet , 2002, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[13]  Ellen Isaacs,et al.  Teen use of messaging media , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Nora Miller,et al.  Alphabet to Email: How Written English Evolved and Where It's Heading , 2002 .

[15]  Ylva Hård af Segerstad.  Use and Adaptation of Written Language to the Conditions of Computer-Mediated Communication , 2002 .

[16]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2002 .

[17]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2001 .

[18]  R. Thomson,et al.  Where Is the Gender in Gendered Language? , 2001, Psychological science.

[19]  Bonnie A. Nardi,et al.  Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action , 2000, CSCW '00.

[20]  Susan C. Herring,et al.  The Rhetorical Dynamics of Gender Harassment On-Line , 1999, Inf. Soc..

[21]  Minna Palander-Collin.  Male and female styles in 17th century correspondence: I THINK , 1999, Language Variation and Change.

[22]  Deborah Cameron,et al.  Gender, Language, and Discourse: A Review Essay , 1998, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[23]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use , 1998 .

[24]  Naomi S. Baron.  Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email. , 1998 .

[25]  P. Trudgill,et al.  Gender and discourse , 1998 .

[26]  G. Whitney.  Computer‐mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross‐cultural perspectives , 1998 .

[27]  Terttu Nevalainen,et al.  To explain the present : studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen , 1997 .

[28]  Simeon J. Yates.  Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing , 1996 .

[29]  J. Walther,et al.  Computer-mediated communication , 2011 .

[30]  M. Collot,et al.  Electric language : A new variety of English , 1996 .

[31]  J. Holmes.  Women, Men and Politeness , 1995 .

[32]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Dimensions of Register Variation , 1995 .

[33]  G. Little,et al.  Centennial Usage Studies , 1994 .

[34]  A. Mulac,et al.  Effects of gender-linked language differences in adults' written discourse: Multivariate tests of language effects , 1994 .

[35]  Natalie Maynor,et al.  7. The Language of Electronic Mail: Written Speech? , 1994 .

[36]  Jack Chambers.  Linguistic Correlates of Gender and Sex , 1992 .

[37]  Kathleen Ferrara,et al.  Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register , 1991 .

[38]  W. Labov.  The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change , 1990, Language Variation and Change.

[39]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[40]  P. Eckert,et al.  Language and Gender: Introduction to the study of language and gender , 2013 .

[41]  J. Coates.  Women, men, and language , 1986 .

[42]  Adam Kendon,et al.  The Sign Language of the Women of Yuendumu: A Preliminary Report on the Structure of Warlpiri Sign Language , 2013 .

[43]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[44]  E. Schegloff,et al.  Opening up Closings , 1973 .

[45]  Richard H. Strauss.  I Think, Therefore: , 1965 .

[46]  Bill Broyles.  Notes , 1907, The Classical Review.