Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms

Abstract.The aim of this study was to determine the visually lossless threshold of a wavelet-based compression algorithm in case of microcalcification cluster detection in mammography. The threshold was determined by means of observer performance using a set of digitized mammograms. In addition, the transfer characteristics of the compression algorithm were assessed by means of image-quality parameters using computer-generated test images. The observer performance study was based on rating performed by four independent radiologists, who reviewed 68 mammograms, from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM), at six different compression ratios. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed on observers' responses and the area under ROC curve (Az) was calculated at each compression ratio for each observer. The parameters used for assessment of transfer characteristics of the compression algorithm were input/output response, noise, high-contrast response, and low-contrast-detail response. The computer-generated test image, used for this assessment, mimicked mammographic image characteristics (pixel size, pixel depth, and noise) as well as microcalcification characteristics (size and contrast). The ROC analysis for microcalcification cluster detection indicated a threshold at compression ratio 40:1, as Student's t-test shows statistically significant differences in Az values (p<0.05) for compression ratios 70:1 and 100:1. Observers' grading of mammogram quality lowers this threshold at 25:1. Low-contrast-detail detectability in the transfer characteristics study indicate a threshold of 35:1, whereas non-perceptibility of image-quality-parameters degradation lowers this threshold to 30:1. The ROC and transfer characteristics analysis provided comparable thresholds, indicating the potential use of the latter in limiting the target range of compression ratios for subsequent observer studies.

[1]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[2]  C. J. Kotre,et al.  The effect of background structure on the detection of low contrast objects in mammography. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  Pamela C. Cosman,et al.  Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammograms , 1997, Signal Process..

[4]  C E Metz,et al.  Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance. The usefulness of confidence intervals. , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[5]  Robert M. Gray,et al.  Management and Lesion Detection Effects of Lossy Image Compression on Digitized Mammograms , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[6]  P K Kijewski,et al.  Effects of lossy compression on lesion detection: predictions of the nonprewhitening matched filter. , 1998, Medical physics.

[7]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  Automated Detection of Microcalcifications after Lossy Compression of Digital Mammograms , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[8]  P. Pattynama,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology. , 1998, European journal of radiology.

[9]  J D Hazle,et al.  Performance analysis of a new semiorthogonal spline wavelet compression algorithm for tonal medical images. , 2000, Medical physics.

[10]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Christopoulos: Thc Jpeg2000 Still Image Coding System: an Overview the Jpeg2000 Still Image Coding System: an Overview , 2022 .

[11]  L Costaridou,et al.  Using component technologies for web based wavelet enhanced mammographic image visualization , 2000, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[12]  N A Obuchowski,et al.  Clinical evaluation of wavelet-compressed digitized screen-film mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[13]  Mark S. Frank,et al.  Design of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study of 10:1 lossy image compression , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[14]  J T Ennis,et al.  Medical image compression based on a morphological representation of wavelet coefficients. , 1999, Medical physics.

[15]  L Costaridou,et al.  A tool for designing digital test objects for module performance evaluation in medical digital imaging. , 1999, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[16]  M L Giger,et al.  Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. , 1991, Radiology.

[17]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  A review of compression methods for medical images in PACS , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[18]  Sergios Theodoridis,et al.  Wavelet-based medical image compression , 1999, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[19]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[20]  D. Blanc,et al.  European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images , 1998 .

[21]  E. Grabbe,et al.  Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions , 2002, European Radiology.

[22]  H. K. Huang,et al.  Teleradiology technologies and some service models. , 1996, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[23]  T Liebig,et al.  Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[24]  L Costaridou,et al.  Quantifying image quality at breast periphery vs mammary gland in mammography using wavelet analysis. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  L Costaridou,et al.  A protocol-based evaluation of medical image digitizers. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  L Costaridou,et al.  An image visualization tool in mammography. , 1999, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[27]  L. Bassett,et al.  A review of mammography test objects for the calibration of resolution, contrast, and exposure. , 1989, Medical physics.

[28]  R. Vemuri,et al.  An analysis on the effect of image features on lossy coding performance , 2000, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[29]  Charles A. Poynton,et al.  Gamma and Its Disguises : The Nonlinear Mappings of Intensity in Perception, CRTs, Film, and Video , 1993 .

[30]  N. Nugent,et al.  European Commission , 1993, European Energy and Environmental Law Review.

[31]  Gerald C. Holst,et al.  Electro-Optical Imaging System Performance , 1995 .