Research on the evolutionary game of environmental pollution in system dynamics model

Environmental pollution abatement is a complex project. A system dynamics (SD) model is built for studying a mixed-strategy evolutionary game between the government that manages environmental pollution and the firm that generates contamination during their production processes. The stability analysis and SD simulation results show that evolutionary equilibrium (EE) does not exist with a static penalty. Therefore, a dynamic penalty is suggested in the SD model for equilibrium stabilisation and improvement in environmental pollution. Furthermore, a restraining penalty is found, which can not only stabilise the evolutional processes but also ideally influence the environmental pollution control in the simulation result. The stability analysis of the evolutionary game with both the dynamic penalties proves that Nash equilibrium takes the role of EE. The SD model can connect the static concept with dynamic predictions in the evolutionary game theory in a visual and convenient way.

[1]  David K. Levine,et al.  The evolution of cooperation through imitation , 2002, Games Econ. Behav..

[2]  Lu Fang-yuan Evolutionary Game Analysis on Environmental Pollution Problem , 2007 .

[3]  Jin Xu Study on a Supervisory Game Based on Evolutionary Game Theory , 2006 .

[4]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers , 2012 .

[5]  J. Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary game dynamics , 2011 .

[6]  P. Taylor,et al.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics , 1978 .

[7]  S. Komorita,et al.  Reciprocity and the induction of cooperation in social dilemmas , 1992 .

[8]  J. Elster,et al.  Nuts and bolts for the social sciences , 1989 .

[9]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[10]  Ian French,et al.  Using System Dynamics to Analyse Interactions in Duopoly Competition , 2000 .

[11]  Evgenia Motchenkova,et al.  Determination of Optimal Penalties for Antitrust Violations in a Dynamic Setting , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Dong-Hwan Kim,et al.  A system dynamics model for a mixed‐strategy game between police and driver , 1997 .

[13]  D. Friedman On economic applications of evolutionary game theory , 1998 .

[14]  George Tsebelis,et al.  The Abuse of Probability in Political Analysis: The Robinson Crusoe Fallacy , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[15]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Mixed-strategy game simulation on environmental pollution based on system dynamics , 2008, 2008 Chinese Control and Decision Conference.

[16]  Robin Mason Dynamic Pollution Games , 1997 .

[17]  Zeng Wei System Dynamics Model for a Mixed-strategy Game of Environmental Pollution , 2009 .

[18]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[19]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[20]  Ana B. Ania,et al.  The evolutionary stability of perfectly competitive behavior , 2005 .

[21]  Zhang Ji-xiang Stability of Evolutionary Equilibrium under Bounded Rationality , 2006 .

[22]  Jack Hirshleifer,et al.  Evolutionary Models in Economics and Law: Cooperation Versus Conflict Strategies , 1980 .

[23]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2012 .

[24]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .