Prediction of cleaned coal yield based on different S-shaped curve models in coal cleaning production

Abstract Five S-shaped curve models are proposed to accurately predict the product yield and reduce the waste of precious coal resources during the coal cleaning process. Taking the Hill model (HM) as an example, the derivation process of parameters is described. The model’s accuracy is then verified by calculating the standard deviation, summary statistics, and residual plots for six groups of experimental data. It shows that the optimal prediction models for samples 1 to 6 are HM, the Gompertz model (GM), GM, the Logistic model (LM), the arctangent model (AM), and the normal integral model (NIM), respectively. The mean standard deviations of HM, GM, LM, NIM, and AM are 2.21, 2.23, 2.37, 2.41, and 3.06, respectively, indicating that the prediction accuracy of the five models is also arranged in this order. The prediction results of the optimal model (GM) are then verified by an industrial test in the Liudong Coal Cleaning Plant. The absolute errors of the separation density, cleaned coal yield, and cleaned coal ash are 0.005kg/L, 0.46%, and -0.09%, respectively. The maximum absolute error of the partition coefficients predicted by GM is -2.89%, while the maximum absolute error predicted by NIM alone is 8.19%, which is 5.30% higher than that predicted by GM. Furthermore, the error of the predicted partition coefficients near the separation density is usually greater than that at both ends of the partition curve, which is acceptable and typical. This work demonstrates that the prediction of cleaned coal yield based on different S-shaped curve models in the coal cleaning process is feasible, efficient, economic, and eco-friendly, and it has potential industrial application.

[1]  S. Mohanta,et al.  On the adequacy of distribution curves used in coal cleaning – A statistical analysis , 2009 .

[2]  O. Bayat,et al.  Upgrading low-rank coals (Çan, Çanakkale/Turkey) by float-sink separation in dense media , 2020, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects.

[3]  V. Manović,et al.  Advanced power cycles for coal-fired power plants based on calcium looping combustion: A techno-economic feasibility assessment , 2020 .

[4]  Dongyang Dou,et al.  A novel distribution rate predicting method of dense medium cyclone in the Taixi coal preparation plant , 2015 .

[5]  M. G. Raj,et al.  Experimentation and statistical prediction of screening performance of coal with different moisture content in the vibrating screen , 2020, International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization.

[6]  Suhua Zeng,et al.  A novel forecasting approach based on multi-kernel nonlinear multivariable grey model: A case report , 2020 .

[7]  Jinho Jung,et al.  Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Freshwater Fish Distribution by Incorporating Water Flow Rate and Quality Variables , 2020, Sustainability.

[8]  Lu-bin Wei,et al.  A skew normal-Laplace model of partition curve based on probability characteristics , 2020 .

[9]  Wang Ying,et al.  A Real-Time Prediction Model for Production Index in Process of Dense-Medium Separation , 2012 .

[10]  Bofeng Cai,et al.  Co-benefits of peaking carbon dioxide emissions on air quality and health, a case of Guangzhou, China. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Bin Liu,et al.  Forecasting Clean Energy Consumption in China by 2025: Using Improved Grey Model GM (1, N) , 2020 .

[12]  Aibing Yu,et al.  Prediction of the performance of dense medium cyclones in coal preparation , 2012 .

[13]  Li Ji,et al.  Research on the intelligent control of the dense medium separation process in coal preparation plant , 2015 .

[14]  Yue-min Zhao,et al.  Process optimization for arsenic removal of fine coal in vibrated dense medium fluidized bed , 2018 .

[15]  A. Akbar,et al.  Diagnostics via partial residual plots in inverse Gaussian regression , 2020 .

[16]  Rick Honaker,et al.  Performance evaluation of a dense-medium cyclone using alternative silica-based media , 2016 .

[17]  Yijun Cao,et al.  New flotation flowsheet for recovering combustible matter from fine waste coking coal , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[18]  Dongyang Dou,et al.  Soft-Sensor Modeling for Separation Performance of Dense-Medium Cyclone by Field Data , 2015 .

[19]  Canjin Luo,et al.  Generalized skew-normal distribution model of partition curves based on quartile , 2020, International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization.

[20]  Yue-min Zhao,et al.  Separation performance of coal in an air dense medium fluidized bed at varying feeding positions , 2019, Fuel.

[21]  Yan Li,et al.  Will Poland fulfill its coal commitment by 2030? An answer based on a novel time series prediction method , 2020 .

[22]  Extraction of information about structural changes in a semisolid pharmaceutical formulation from near‐infrared and Raman images by multivariate curve resolution–alternating least squares and ComDim , 2020 .

[23]  Zhe Lin,et al.  Online Optimization Research on a Feedforward Compensation Model in an Automatic Control System for Heavy Medium-induced Separation , 2020 .

[24]  T. Napier-Munn The dense medium cyclone – past, present and future , 2017 .

[25]  W. Nheta,et al.  Recent developments in beneficiation of fine and ultra-fine coal -review paper , 2020 .

[27]  H. Vuthaluru,et al.  Mathematical representation of the performance of DM cyclone and Vorsyl separator for coal cleaning , 2020, International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization.

[28]  Yanwei Liu,et al.  The integrated drainage technique of directional high-level borehole of super large diameter on roof replacing roof extraction roadway: A case study of the underground Zhaozhuang Coal Mine , 2020 .

[29]  Jian-guo Yang,et al.  Coal and gangue recognition under four operating conditions by using image analysis and Relief-SVM , 2018, International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization.