Teaching multiplication to low math performers: Guided versus structured instruction

The results of an intervention program forstudents with difficulties learning mathematicsare reported. Two kinds of math intervention,guided versus structured instruction, werecompared to regular math instruction. A totalof 75 students from regular and specialeducation, aged seven to thirteen,participated. Ability and automaticitymultiplication tests were administered beforeand after the four-month training period. Theresults show that the students in both of theexperimental conditions improved more than thestudents in the control condition. Someadditional differences were found between thetwo experimental interventions. Guidedinstruction appeared to be more effective forlow performing students than structuredinstruction and especially for those studentsin regular education. Special educationstudents appear to benefit most from structuredinstruction for the automaticity ofmultiplication problems. A three monthfollow-up test showed the acquired knowledge tobe well-established in both groups.

[1]  H. Freudenthal,et al.  Revisiting mathematics education , 1992, The Mathematical Gazette.

[2]  P. Cobb.  Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development , 1994 .

[3]  E. Kroesbergen,et al.  Mathematics Interventions for Children with Special Educational Needs , 2003 .

[4]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  The Effects of Computer-Assisted Versus Teacher-Directed Instruction on the Multiplication Performance of Elementary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[5]  David C. Geary,et al.  Children's Mathematical Development: Research and Practical Applications , 1996 .

[6]  H. Freudenthal.  Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful , 1968 .

[7]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[8]  L. Farrand.  THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. , 1897, Science.

[9]  John W. Fantuzzo,et al.  An Evaluation of the Relative Effectiveness of NCTM Standards-Based Interventions for Low-Achieving Urban Elementary Students. , 1998 .

[10]  D. Rivera.  Mathematics Education and Students with Learning Disabilities , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[11]  C. Hirsch.  Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics , 1988 .

[12]  J. Naglieri,et al.  Effectiveness of the MASTER Program for Teaching Special Children Multiplication and Division , 1999, Journal of learning disabilities.

[13]  Rich Wilson,et al.  Mathematics Instruction for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[14]  The effectiveness of structural and realistic arithmetic curricula in children with special needs , 1994 .

[15]  C. D. Mercer,et al.  Implications of Constructivism for Teaching Math to Students with Moderate to Mild Disabilities , 1994 .

[16]  A. Treffers,et al.  The empty number line in Dutch second grades: Realistic versus gradual program design , 1998 .

[17]  David C. Geary,et al.  Cognitive Addition : A Short Longitudinal Study of Strategy Choice and Speed-of-Processing Differences in Normal and Mathematically Disabled Children , 1991 .

[18]  D. Wacker,et al.  Teaching multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities. , 1998, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[19]  J. Woodward,et al.  The Effects of an Innovative Approach to Mathematics on Academically Low-Achieving Students in Inclusive Settings , 1997 .

[20]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  The Effects of Schema-Based Instruction on the Mathematical Word-Problem-Solving Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities , 1996, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. , 1991 .

[22]  Carolyn A. Harris.  Teaching Initial Multiplication Skills to Students with Disabilities in General Education Classrooms. , 1995 .

[23]  Koeno Gravemeijer,et al.  The role of contexts and models in the development of mathematical strategies and procedures , 1997 .