Signals and noise in the elasmobranch electrosensory system

Analyzing signal and noise for any sensory system requires an appreciation of the biological and physical milieu of the animal. Behavioral studies show that elasmobranchs use their electrosensory systems extensively for prey detection, but also for mate recognition and possibly for navigation. These biologically important signals are detected against a background of self-generated bioelectric fields. Noise-suppression mechanisms can be recognized at a number of different levels: behavior, receptor anatomy and physiology, and at the early stages of sensory processing. The peripheral filters and receptor characteristics provide a detector with permissive temporal properties but restrictive spatial characteristics. Biologically important signals probably cover the range from direct current to 10 Hz, whereas the bandwidth of the receptors is more like 0.1-10 Hz. This degree of alternating current coupling overcomes significant noise problems while still allowing the animal to detect external direct current signals by its own movement. Self-generated bioelectric fields modulated by breathing movement have similar temporal characteristics to important external signals and produce very strong modulation of electrosensory afferents. This sensory reafference is essentially similar, or common-mode, across all afferent fibers. The principal electrosensory neurons (ascending efferent neurons; AENs) of the dorsal octavolateralis nucleus show a greatly reduced response to common-mode signals. This suppression is mediated by the balanced excitatory and inhibitory components of their spatial receptive fields. The receptive field characteristics of AENs determine the information extracted from external stimuli for further central processing.

[1]  Kalmijn Aj.  Electromagnetic orientation: a relativistic approach. , 1988 .

[2]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Movements of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) in depth and course , 1990 .

[3]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  The Detection of Electric Fields from Inanimate and Animate Sources Other Than Electric Organs , 1974 .

[4]  S. Gould.  The Shape of Life , 1996 .

[5]  B. Claas,et al.  Evolution of electroreception , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Electric and magnetic field detection in elasmobranch fishes. , 1982, Science.

[7]  Bruce B. Collette,et al.  The Diversity of Fishes , 1997 .

[8]  Kalmijn Aj,et al.  Electric and near-field acoustic detection, a comparative study. , 1997 .

[9]  P. Mg.  Electroreception and the Compass Sense of Sharks , 2022 .

[10]  David Bodznick,et al.  HINDBRAIN CIRCUITRY MEDIATING COMMON MODE SUPPRESSION OF VENTILATORY REAFFERENCE IN THE ELECTROSENSORY SYSTEM OF THE LITTLE SKATE RAJA ERINACEA , 1993 .

[11]  David Bodznick,et al.  Suppression of Ventilatory Reafference in the Elasmobranch Electrosensory System: Medullary Neuron Receptive Fields Support a Common Mode Ejection Mechanism , 1992 .

[12]  Ad. J. Kalmijn,et al.  Detection of Weak Electric Fields , 1988 .

[13]  John C. Montgomery.  Frequency response characteristics of primary and secondary neurons in the electrosensory system of the thornback ray , 1984 .

[14]  J. Sisneros,et al.  Electrosensory optimization to conspecific phasic signals for mating , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  B Waltman,et al.  Electrical properties and fine structure of the ampullary canals of Lorenzini. , 1966, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[16]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Biophysics of geomagnetic field detection , 1981 .

[17]  Q. Bone,et al.  On Bipedalism in Skates and Rays , 1993 .

[18]  M V Bennett,et al.  Accommodation to maintained stimuli in the ampullae of Lorenzini: how an electroreceptive fish achieves sensitivity in a noisy world. , 1993, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[19]  A. Klimley,et al.  Highly directional swimming by scalloped hammerhead sharks, Sphyrna lewini, and subsurface irradiance, temperature, bathymetry, and geomagnetic field , 1993 .

[20]  R. Raff.  Understanding Evolution: The Next Step. (Book Reviews: The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form.) , 1996 .

[21]  A. Kalmijn,et al.  Electric and near-field acoustic detection, a comparative study. , 1997, Acta physiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[22]  Timothy C. Tricas.  Bioelectric-Mediated Predation by Swell Sharks, Cephaloscyllium ventriosum , 1982 .

[23]  David Bodznick,et al.  SUPPRESSION OF COMMON MODE SIGNALS WITHIN THE ELECTROSENSORY SYSTEM OF THE LITTLE SKATE , 1992 .