In design, much research deals with cases where design variables are deterministic thus ignoring possible uncertainties present in manufacturing or environmental conditions. When uncertainty is considered, the design variables follow a particular distribution whose parameters are defined. Probabilistic design aims to reduce the probability of failure of a system by moving the distribution parameters of the design variables. The most popular method to estimate the probability of failure is a Monte Carlo Simulation where, using the distribution parameters, many runs are generated and the number of times the system does not meet specifications is counted. This method, however, can become time-consuming as the mechanistic model developed to model a physical system becomes increasingly complex. From structural reliability theory, the First Order Reliability Method (FORM) is an efficient method to estimate probability and efficiently moves the parameters to reduce failure probability. However, if the mechanistic model is too complex FORM becomes difficult to use. This paper presents a methodology to use approximating functions, called 'metamodels', with FORM to search for a design that minimizes the probability of failure. The method will be applied to three examples and the accuracy and speed of this metamodel-based probabilistic design method will be discussed. The speed and accuracy of three popular metamodels, the response surface model, the Radial Basis Function and the Kriging model are compared. Later, some theory will be presented on how the method can be applied to systems with a dynamic performance measure where the response lifetime is required to computer another performance measure.
[1]
Bruno Sudret,et al.
The PHI2 method: a way to compute time-variant reliability
,
2004,
Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..
[2]
Kyung K. Choi,et al.
Selecting probabilistic approaches for reliability-based design optimization
,
2004
.
[3]
Farrokh Mistree,et al.
Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization
,
2001
.
[4]
R. Grandhi,et al.
Reliability-based structural optimization using improved two-point adaptive nonlinear approximations
,
1998
.
[5]
Jian Deng,et al.
Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance function using radial basis function network
,
2006
.
[6]
Sanjay B. Joshi,et al.
Metamodeling: Radial basis functions, versus polynomials
,
2002,
Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[7]
T. Simpson,et al.
Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria
,
2001
.
[8]
Zissimos P. Mourelatos,et al.
Reliability-based design optimisation of vehicle drivetrain dynamic performance
,
2008
.
[9]
L. Schueremans,et al.
Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis
,
2005
.
[10]
Achille Messac,et al.
Metamodeling using extended radial basis functions: a comparative approach
,
2006,
Engineering with Computers.
[11]
Dan M. Frangopol,et al.
Reliability-based analysis and design optimization of electrostatically actuated MEMS
,
2004
.
[12]
T. Simpson,et al.
Use of Kriging Models to Approximate Deterministic Computer Models
,
2005
.