Surface electromyography in the identification of chronic low back pain patients: the development of the flexion relaxation ratio.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a reliable and repeatable way to monitor changes in the flexion relaxation phenomenon of the lumbar paraspinal muscles during forward flexion by the development of a flexion relaxation ratio and observation of the sEMG activity in standing and during forward flexion in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and healthy controls. DESIGN: Two experiments were conducted, the first to assess the test-retest reliability of the measure in a group of CLBP (n = 11) patients; the second compared the results between a group of normal healthy controls (n = 20) and a group of CLBP patients (n = 70). RESULTS: Repeated measurements over 4 weeks demonstrated between session reliability of between 0.81 and 0.98 for the dynamic activity. The levels of sEMG activity in the fully flexed position was significantly greater in the fully flexed position in the CLBP group than the controls. The flexion relaxation ratio (FRR), a comparison of the maximal sEMG activity during 1 s of forward flexion with activity in full flexion, demonstrated significantly lower values in the CLBP than the control group. The combined discriminant validity for the FRR for all four sites resulted in 93% sensitivity and 75% specificity. CONCLUSION: The FRR clearly discriminated the patients from the healthy controls. These results indicate that dynamic sEMG activity of the paraspinal muscles can be reliably measured and is useful in differentiating CLBP patients from normal controls. RELEVANCE: Analysis of the pattern of different levels of muscle activity during a forward flexion can be used in CLBP where normalization of the sEMG signal to the maximum voluntary contraction may be difficult. The FRR may be used in the assessment of change in the flexion relaxation phenomenon following treatment interventions.

[1]  C. Norris.  Spinal Stabilisation: 4. Muscle Imbalance and the Low Back , 1995 .

[2]  Ronald Melzack,et al.  Contribution of central neuroplasticity to pathological pain: review of clinical and experimental evidence , 1993, Pain.

[3]  L. V. Christensen.  Physiology and pathophysiology of skeletal muscle contractions , 1986 .

[4]  B. Bigland-ritchie,et al.  Linear and non-linear surface EMG/force relationships in human muscles. An anatomical/functional argument for the existence of both. , 1983, American journal of physical medicine.

[5]  H. Flor,et al.  Assessment of stress-related psychophysiological reactions in chronic back pain patients. , 1985, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[6]  L. Haugh,et al.  Prospective evidence for change in paraspinal muscle activity after herniated nucleus pulposus. , 1993, Spine.

[7]  J. Partanen,et al.  Electric behavior of low back muscles during lumbar pelvic rhythm in low back pain patients and healthy controls. , 1991, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[8]  S. Konno,et al.  The Relationship Between Intramuscular Pressure of the Paraspinal Muscles and Low Back Pain , 1994, Spine.

[9]  A. Schultz,et al.  Correlation of Objective Measure of Trunk Motion and Muscle Function with Low-back Disability Ratings , 1987, Spine.

[10]  C. Norris.  Spinal Stabilisation: 1. Active Lumbar Stabilisation — Concepts , 1995 .

[11]  V. Janda.  Muscles, Central Nervous Motor Regulation and Back Problems , 1978 .

[12]  H. Flor,et al.  Psychophysiology of chronic pain: do chronic pain patients exhibit symptom-specific psychophysiological responses? , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  S M McGill,et al.  Transfer of Loads Between Lumbar Tissues During the Flexion‐Relaxation Phenomenon , 1994, Spine.

[14]  Serge H. Roy,et al.  Lumbar Muscle Fatigue and Chronic Lower Back Pain , 1989, Spine.

[15]  L. McCracken,et al.  Prediction of pain in patients with chronic low back pain: effects of inaccurate prediction and pain-related anxiety. , 1993, Behaviour research and therapy.

[16]  David K. Ahern,et al.  Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls , 1988, Pain.

[17]  M. Jayson,et al.  The Lumbar Spine and Back Pain , 1993 .

[18]  J D Troup,et al.  Outline of a Fear-Avoidance Model of exaggerated pain perception--I. , 1983, Behaviour research and therapy.

[19]  W. Floyd,et al.  The function of the erectores spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man * , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[20]  A. Parker,et al.  Posture Related to Myoelectric Silence of Erectores Spinae During Trunk Flexion , 1984, Spine.

[21]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Biofeedback and self-regulation , 1979 .

[22]  The relationship of extraneous movements to lumbar paraspinal muscle activity: Implications for EMG biofeedback training applications to low back pain patients , 1989, Biofeedback and self-regulation.

[23]  A Nouwen,et al.  Patterns of Muscular Activity during Movement in Patients with Chronic Low-back Pain , 1987, Spine.

[24]  R. Sherman,et al.  Electromyographic recordings of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in six different positions: effect of pain levels , 1991, Pain.

[25]  P. Onghena,et al.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance , 1995, Pain.

[26]  V. Janda.  Muscles and motor control in low back pain : assessment and management , 1987 .

[27]  I. Korr.  The Neurobiologic Mechanisms in Manipulative Therapy , 1978, Springer US.

[28]  S. Mense,et al.  Nociception from skeletal muscle in relation to clinical muscle pain , 1993, Pain.

[29]  C. Godfrey,et al.  The Incidence of Denervation of the Sacrospinales Muscles Following Spinal Surgery , 1977 .

[30]  Symptom-specific psychophysiological responses in chronic pain patients. , 1992, Psychophysiology.

[31]  R. Sherman,et al.  Electromyographic recordings of 5 types of low back pain subjects and non-pain controls in different positions , 1989, Pain.