Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial.

OBJECTIVES The echocardiographic contrast-enhancing effects and safety profile of ALBUNEX (a suspension of air-filled albumin microspheres) were compared with the new contrast agent OPTISON (formerly FS069: a suspension of albumin microspheres containing the gas perfluoropropane) in 203 patients with inadequate noncontrast echocardiograms. BACKGROUND The efficacy of ALBUNEX has been limited by its short duration of action. By using perfluoropropane instead of air within the microsphere, its duration of action is increased. METHODS Each patient received ALBUNEX (0.8 and 0.22 mL/kg) and OPTISON (0.2, 0.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mL) on separate days a minimum of 48 hours apart. Echocardiograms were evaluated for increase in left ventricular (LV) endocardial border length, degree of LV opacification, number of LV endocardial border segments visualized, conversion from a nondiagnostic to a diagnostic echocardiogram, and duration of contrast enhancement. A thorough safety evaluation was conducted. RESULTS Compared with ALBUNEX, OPTISON more significantly improved every measure of contrast enhancement. OPTISON increased well-visualized LV endocardial border length by 6.0+/-5.1, 6.9+/-5.4, 7.5+/-4.7, and 7.6+/-4.8 cm, respectively, for each of the four doses, compared with only 2.2+/-4.5 and 3.4+/-4.6 cm, respectively, for the two ALBUNEX doses (p < 0.001). 100% LV opacification was achieved in 61%, 73%, 87%, and 87% of the patients with the four doses of OPTISON, but in only 16% and 36% of the patients with the two ALBUNEX doses (p < 0.001). Conversion of nondiagnostic to diagnostic echocardiograms with contrast occurred in 74% of patients with the optimal dose of OPTISON (3.0 mL) compared with only 26% with the optimal dose of ALBUNEX (0.22 mL/kg) (p < 0.001). The duration of contrast effect was also significantly greater with OPTISON than with ALBUNEX. In a subset of patients with potentially poor transpulmonary transit of contrast (patients with chronic lung disease or dilated cardiomyopathy), OPTISON more significantly improved the same measures of contrast enhancement compared with ALBUNEX and did so to the same extent as in the overall population. Side effects were similar and transient with the two agents. CONCLUSION OPTISON appears to be a safe, well-tolerated echocardiographic contrast agent that is superior to ALBUNEX.

[1]  S. Kaul,et al.  Albunex: a safe and effective commercially produced agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[2]  J. T. Thompson,et al.  Prediction of the kinetics of disappearance of sulfur hexafluoride and perfluoropropane intraocular gas bubbles. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Reduced forward output states affect the left ventricular opacification of intravenously administered Albunex. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  K. A. Robinson,et al.  Effects of left ventricular pressure on sonicated albumin microbubbles: evaluation using an isolated rabbit heart model. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  T. Skotland,et al.  Physical and biochemical characterization of Albunex, a new ultrasound contrast agent consisting of air‐filled albumin microspheres suspended in a solution of human albumin , 1994, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[6]  P. Burns Harmonic imaging with ultrasound contrast agents. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[7]  J. Kisslo,et al.  Opacification and border delineation improvement in patients with suboptimal endocardial border definition in routine echocardiography: results of the Phase III Albunex Multicenter Trial. , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  R. Mattrey The potential role of perfluorochemicals (PFCs) in diagnostic imaging. , 1994, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[9]  R. Thisted,et al.  The influence of intravenous Albunex injections on pulmonary arterial pressure, gas exchange, and left ventricular peak intensity. , 1992, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[10]  K. A. Robinson,et al.  Echocardiographic contrast agents and left ventricular contractility: evaluation using an isolated rabbit heart model. , 1996, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[11]  Chilton,et al.  Pharmaceuticals in Medical Imaging , 1990 .

[12]  F J Ten Cate,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a new transpulmonary ultrasound contrast agent: initial multicenter clinical results. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  J. Kisslo,et al.  Contrast echocardiography: influence of ultrasonic machine settings, mixing conditions, and pressurization on pixel intensity and microsphere size of Albunex solutions in vitro. , 1997, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Loss of contrast intensity during systole in the left ventricular cavity with the use of the contrast agent Albunex. An analysis of its correlation with pressure and velocity. , 1996, Investigative radiology.

[15]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Pitfalls in quantitative contrast echocardiography: the steps to quantitation of perfusion. , 1993, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[16]  S. Kaul,et al.  Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  A. Weyman,et al.  Effect of static pressure on the disappearance rate of specific echocardiographic contrast agents. , 1994, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[18]  J. Murgo,et al.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography: reliable, safe, and efficacious myocardial perfusion assessment after intravenous injections of a new echocardiographic contrast agent. , 1996, American heart journal.

[19]  F. Piquard,et al.  Safety and efficacy of a new transpulmonary echo contrast agent in echocardiographic studies in patients. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  S. Kaul,et al.  Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Arnold B. Arons,et al.  Underwater Acoustics Handbook II , 1966 .

[22]  R. Erbel,et al.  The influence of Albunex on the pulmonary circulation in patients with pulmonary hypertension or left heart failure. , 1996, European heart journal.